A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
devogue

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by devogue » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:08 pm

Lozzer's not a fudgepacker. :nono:






































He's a fudgepackee. :dance: :hehe:

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by kiki5711 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:08 pm

Image

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Tigger » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:13 pm

Not directed at anyone whatsoever, but if this thread hits 1000 posts, it will be locked according to our guidelines. Please prepare yourselves for that eventuality (shit, I hope it doesn't continue that far), and do not assume that the mods have gone power mad - it will be explained whine it happens, and appropriate links will be inserted unless we forget. Anyone who suggests it's mod interference at that time will be regarded as an utter, utter cunt, but not yet, mind: I'd hate to be accused of being rude as this is merely an untargeted and peremptory personal attack.
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by charlou » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:16 pm

devogue wrote:Lozzer's not a fudgepacker. :nono:

He's a fudgepackee. :dance: :hehe:
Maybe, but if so, who gives a ratz arse? :dance:

Other than any interested fudgepackers ..
no fences

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by charlou » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:17 pm

Tigger wrote:Not directed at anyone whatsoever, but if this thread hits 1000 posts, it will be locked according to our guidelines. Please prepare yourselves for that eventuality (shit, I hope it doesn't continue that far), and do not assume that the mods have gone power mad - it will be explained whine it happens, and appropriate links will be inserted unless we forget. Anyone who suggests it's mod interference at that time will be regarded as an utter, utter cunt, but not yet, mind: I'd hate to be accused of being rude as this is merely an untargeted and peremptory personal attack.
Ah yes, good thinking. :tup:
no fences

User avatar
tattuchu
a dickload of cocks
Posts: 21889
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by tattuchu » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:17 pm

I like the term "Marmite miner" better :hehe:
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.

But those letters are not silent.

They're just waiting their turn.

LaMont Cranston
Posts: 872
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:58 pm
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by LaMont Cranston » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:19 pm

It's obvious that some people are rather annoyed with the way this thread is going, but let's not overlook the benefits that are being realized. For starters, some people are adding words to their vocabularies, and that's got to be a good thing. In that movie I saw, it was a reference to the gay bar scene in LA, but, generally speaking, I'm not sure that the way it's used is limited to gay males. I think that it refers to "taking it in the ass," regardless of gender.

Another good thing that's come out of this thread is that picture of lordpasternak (looking very hot) with her whip. We now have maiforpeace and some others conceptually spanking me. I hope that some of you won't hold it against me if I like the way this thread is going. Actually, if some of you were to "hold it against me," that might be a lot of fun...

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by maiforpeace » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:23 pm

LaMont Cranston wrote:It's obvious that some people are rather annoyed with the way this thread is going, but let's not overlook the benefits that are being realized. For starters, some people are adding words to their vocabularies, and that's got to be a good thing. In that movie I saw, it was a reference to the gay bar scene in LA, but, generally speaking, I'm not sure that the way it's used is limited to gay males. I think that it refers to "taking it in the ass," regardless of gender.

Another good thing that's come out of this thread is that picture of lordpasternak (looking very hot) with her whip. We now have maiforpeace and some others conceptually spanking me. I hope that some of you won't hold it against me if I like the way this thread is going. Actually, if some of you were to "hold it against me," that might be a lot of fun...
So you are a fudgepackee too then? That's what I was doing, not spanking you. :razzle:
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Tigger » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:24 pm

LaMont Cranston wrote:It's obvious that some people are rather annoyed with the way this thread is going, but let's not overlook the benefits that are being realized. For starters, some people are adding words to their vocabularies, and that's got to be a good thing. In that movie I saw, it was a reference to the gay bar scene in LA, but, generally speaking, I'm not sure that the way it's used is limited to gay males. I think that it refers to "taking it in the ass," regardless of gender.

Another good thing that's come out of this thread is that picture of lordpasternak (looking very hot) with her whip. We now have maiforpeace and some others conceptually spanking me. I hope that some of you won't hold it against me if I like the way this thread is going. Actually, if some of you were to "hold it against me," that might be a lot of fun...
She actually broke that whip in my presence, so nyer!
Except I had to buy a new one. :shifty:
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

devogue

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by devogue » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:28 pm

Tigger wrote:Not directed at anyone whatsoever, but if this thread hits 1000 posts, it will be locked according to our guidelines. Please prepare yourselves for that eventuality (shit, I hope it doesn't continue that far), and do not assume that the mods have gone power mad - it will be explained whine it happens, and appropriate links will be inserted unless we forget. Anyone who suggests it's mod interference at that time will be regarded as an utter, utter cunt, but not yet, mind: I'd hate to be accused of being rude as this is merely an untargeted and peremptory personal attack.
Haaaiii Freud. :awesome:

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:30 pm

This thread has become like a scab that gets it's self picked at.


But that said, the term "Fudge packer" got me to remembering one of my all time favorite movies: Cannibal: The Musical produced by, and starring Matt Stone and Trey Parker, which I just discovered is available on Hulu. I recommend that anyone wishing for some comic relief watch this great American classic.

http://www.hulu.com/watch/130445/cannibal-the-musical


I recommend it to anyone needing some comic relief from the dramaz, which are becoming rather tedious.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:33 pm

Finally, this thread is going in a more productive direction...
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

devogue

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by devogue » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:39 pm

The Tom Cruise episode of South Park with the fudge packing was just awespme.

devogue

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by devogue » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:41 pm

Does anyone else here have a strange feeling of arm-linked, banner-waving solidarity as we head towards the finish line of this legendary thread? :leave:

User avatar
Tigger
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 piccolos
Posts: 15714
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:26 pm
About me: It's not "about" me, it's exactly me.
Location: location location.

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Tigger » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:43 pm

devogue wrote:
Tigger wrote:Not directed at anyone whatsoever, but if this thread hits 1000 posts, it will be locked according to our guidelines. Please prepare yourselves for that eventuality (shit, I hope it doesn't continue that far), and do not assume that the mods have gone power mad - it will be explained whine it happens, and appropriate links will be inserted unless we forget. Anyone who suggests it's mod interference at that time will be regarded as an utter, utter cunt, but not yet, mind: I'd hate to be accused of being rude as this is merely an untargeted and peremptory personal attack.
Haaaiii Freud. :awesome:
HaaaiiI did it on porpoise. 8-)
Image
Seth wrote:Fuck that, I like opening Pandora's box and shoving my tool inside it

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests