mistermack wrote:Cunt wrote:
Who decides what is 'rational'?
You tell me. Or do you not care whether a person is rational or not?
I don't think it's my decision to make.
mistermack wrote:
Do you think that a person who appears clearly irrational to others should be allowed to commit suicide?
Rodger Young defied rational orders and suicided - accomplishing what no rational person would have thought he could.
What if it was a chemical imbalance? Would you cure him?
mistermack wrote:If chemicals can change suicidal intentions, then they can also cause them. This is well documented, it's been shown over and over again in double blind trials, and warnings are printed on many medications saying that the patient should immediatly stop taking it, if they experience thoughts of suicide. I've read it myself on something I was taking, that was nothing to do with mental health or moods.
I would recommend the same thing. Get rid of those thoughts.
mistermack wrote:If chemicals you ingest can cause this, then so can chemicals that your body produces. I think I mentioned before that my mother went through hell, before a hysterectomy changed her life.
My nephew also had a terrible time, in his late teens, and my sister was terrified he would end it all. It disappeared when he stopped taking an acne treatment. But that treatment was apparently responsible for many deaths.
Do you think suicide can ever be the right answer, if the thoughts are due to chemical imbalance?
You would have to ask the person who was considering suicide. I think it's a very individual thing.
mistermack wrote:
Cunt wrote:
Plus, I see you are back, does that mean you have decided to accept my answer
I didn't know you had one.
mistermack wrote:Cunt, I didn't ask you about people you "know", or say you knew. If you have to answer a different question, in order to give the answer you want to write, you're just as do-dally as the cunt who can't remember.
Either way, there's no point in continuing.
Bye.
.
I did answer your question. In the same post, actually. Did you read this part:
Cunt wrote:As to those strangers you elect to pass your (foul, insulting) judgement on, I will not judge.
I won't be judgemental. Do you want me to say how many were 'impulse' suicides? It is going to take me an awfully long time to get there. I would have to know what qualified as 'impulse', then find a way to measure those qualities and likely hire a statistician to help collect and understand the data.
The way you were using it was not in any clear kind of way, it was simply a way of being insulting (effectively) all the members of a group you don't agree with.
Sorry you can't seem to respect people's freedom of choice. I hope you get over it.[/quote]
Do you remember now?
If you want to rephrase your question, go ahead.
mistermack wrote:
Cunt wrote:
and move forward?
Not in the direction you're pointing.
What's your answer to the schizophrenic question. Should you stop someone, if only one side wants to end it all?
.
I think the two personalities would have to decide between them.
Oh, and your understanding of mental illness could use some work.