A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:16 am

Gallstones already announced she was leaving the thread, so I'll just point out something about this:
Image

Earlier in the thread Gallstones posted:
Gallstones wrote:
95Theses wrote:Sure,

but i'm sure as hell going to point out when you are dishonestly representing facts to further your own twisted little agenda. Like you just did trying to post a pic of a thread that was locked for an hour for tidy up as being locked to stifle dissent, and it can't have been an 'honest' mistake because there was a mod note in place saying 'Don't panic, only shut briefly to put posts in the relevant threads'

That is plain flat our lying.

It's humor.

I didn't take that screen shot, it was sent to me by someone else. As a joke.



Can I know what my twisted agenda is?
I'm dying to know.
It was funny, at least to me it was. I don't see how you folks would think Gallstones thought she was getting away with a grand deception.

But by all means, don't let it get in the way of the dramaz.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:17 am

Pensioner wrote:You mean to say you cannot say right wing libertarians are bat shit crazy? Jeebus….

:wtf:
What are you, some socialist leach come to suck society dry?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74094
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by JimC » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:18 am

Pensioner wrote:You mean to say you cannot say right wing libertarians are bat shit crazy? Jeebus….

:wtf:
Not good, Pen... :nono:

And it appears we couldn't say that ancient lefties are cretinous commos either! :nono:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Imagination Theory
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:25 am

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Imagination Theory » Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:54 am

Robert_S wrote:Gallstones already announced she was leaving the thread, so I'll just point out something about this:
Image

Earlier in the thread Gallstones posted:
Gallstones wrote:
95Theses wrote:Sure,

but i'm sure as hell going to point out when you are dishonestly representing facts to further your own twisted little agenda. Like you just did trying to post a pic of a thread that was locked for an hour for tidy up as being locked to stifle dissent, and it can't have been an 'honest' mistake because there was a mod note in place saying 'Don't panic, only shut briefly to put posts in the relevant threads'

That is plain flat our lying.

It's humor.

I didn't take that screen shot, it was sent to me by someone else. As a joke.



Can I know what my twisted agenda is?
I'm dying to know.
It was funny, at least to me it was. I don't see how you folks would think Gallstones thought she was getting away with a grand deception.

But by all means, don't let it get in the way of the dramaz.
It is funny, I laughed. It's just this is a different forum and without writing anything else it is also misleading.

I guess we both love us some dramaz since we are posting in the same place. :woot:
Я пью за разоренный дом,
За злую жизнь мою,
За одиночество вдвоем,
И за тебя я пью, -
За ложь меня предавших губ,
За мертвый холод глаз,
За то, что мир жесток и груб,
За то, что Бог не спас.

Последний тост ~ 27 июня 1934

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Robert_S » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:01 am

Imagination Theory wrote:
Robert_S wrote:Gallstones already announced she was leaving the thread, so I'll just point out something about this:
Image

Earlier in the thread Gallstones posted:
Gallstones wrote:
95Theses wrote:Sure,

but i'm sure as hell going to point out when you are dishonestly representing facts to further your own twisted little agenda. Like you just did trying to post a pic of a thread that was locked for an hour for tidy up as being locked to stifle dissent, and it can't have been an 'honest' mistake because there was a mod note in place saying 'Don't panic, only shut briefly to put posts in the relevant threads'

That is plain flat our lying.

It's humor.

I didn't take that screen shot, it was sent to me by someone else. As a joke.



Can I know what my twisted agenda is?
I'm dying to know.
It was funny, at least to me it was. I don't see how you folks would think Gallstones thought she was getting away with a grand deception.

But by all means, don't let it get in the way of the dramaz.
It is funny, I laughed. It's just this is a different forum and without writing anything else it is also misleading.

I guess we both love us some dramaz since we are posting in the same place. :woot:
It's not something I look forward to or would try to start, but I have found that taking a lighthearted approach to it when it's around improves the quality of my life by an order of magnitude or two.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
Imagination Theory
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:25 am

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Imagination Theory » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:09 am

Robert_S wrote:
Imagination Theory wrote:
Robert_S wrote:Gallstones already announced she was leaving the thread, so I'll just point out something about this:
Image

Earlier in the thread Gallstones posted:
Gallstones wrote:
95Theses wrote:Sure,

but i'm sure as hell going to point out when you are dishonestly representing facts to further your own twisted little agenda. Like you just did trying to post a pic of a thread that was locked for an hour for tidy up as being locked to stifle dissent, and it can't have been an 'honest' mistake because there was a mod note in place saying 'Don't panic, only shut briefly to put posts in the relevant threads'

That is plain flat our lying.

It's humor.

I didn't take that screen shot, it was sent to me by someone else. As a joke.



Can I know what my twisted agenda is?
I'm dying to know.
It was funny, at least to me it was. I don't see how you folks would think Gallstones thought she was getting away with a grand deception.

But by all means, don't let it get in the way of the dramaz.
It is funny, I laughed. It's just this is a different forum and without writing anything else it is also misleading.

I guess we both love us some dramaz since we are posting in the same place. :woot:
It's not something I look forward to or would try to start, but I have found that taking a lighthearted approach to it when it's around improves the quality of my life by an order of magnitude or two.
I'm glad, I like when people enjoy life. :tup:

I wasn't trying to start anything either by the way, like I said I do think it's funny, on this forum and on this thread it can be misleading though. 'Tis all I am saying. :awesome:
Я пью за разоренный дом,
За злую жизнь мою,
За одиночество вдвоем,
И за тебя я пью, -
За ложь меня предавших губ,
За мертвый холод глаз,
За то, что мир жесток и груб,
За то, что Бог не спас.

Последний тост ~ 27 июня 1934

devogue

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by devogue » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:46 am

Pensioner wrote:You mean to say you cannot say right wing libertarians are bat shit crazy? Jeebus….
It's okay, because everyone is protected. You can't call Creationists indolent or stupid, and you can't describe their dearly held world view as a "masturbation fantasy". You're also forbidden from using "bad" words when debating with them and other theists because under the forum rules on trolling such actions are "inflammatory" and they "provoke emotional responses from members".*

Oh hang on... :ask:

Do you see how easy it is to get your knickers in a twist with such rules, and how irrational they are?

*with apologies to Calilasseia; I agree with him - I'm just making a point and he sprang immediately to mind.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by FBM » Sat Aug 21, 2010 11:15 am

Gertie wrote:
Pensioner wrote:You mean to say you cannot say right wing libertarians are bat shit crazy? Jeebus….
It's okay, because everyone is protected. You can't call Creationists indolent or stupid, and you can't describe their dearly held world view as a "masturbation fantasy". You're also forbidden from using "bad" words when debating with them and other theists because under the forum rules on trolling such actions are "inflammatory" and they "provoke emotional responses from members".*

Oh hang on... :ask:

Do you see how easy it is to get your knickers in a twist with such rules, and how irrational they are?

*with apologies to Calilasseia; I agree with him - I'm just making a point and he sprang immediately to mind.
Jeezus Fucking Christ on a buttplug. You said it, bro. If there's one thing I hate, it's foul language and emotional responses from members. Goddammit, that's two fucking things. :fp: :lay: :I-love-pork: :banghead:



;)
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by Pensioner » Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:20 pm

Robert_S wrote:
Pensioner wrote:You mean to say you cannot say right wing libertarians are bat shit crazy? Jeebus….

:wtf:
What are you, some socialist leach come to suck society dry?



:fix:
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by FBM » Sat Aug 21, 2010 3:27 pm

Robert_S wrote:
FBM wrote:Fine. Have fun. It sickens me.
Is my attempt at somewhat subtle humor failing?

:pardon: It was late here. I wasn't capable of comprehending subtlety at that point. :fp:
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
The Curious Squid
Lazy Spic Bastard
Posts: 7648
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:51 pm
About me: a sexually deviant misogynist sexist pig who's into sex trafficking, sexual slavery, murder, bondage, rape and pre-frontal lobotomy of your victims.
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by The Curious Squid » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:21 pm

I have a question.

Why the hell are you lot even having this argument on Rationalia? What the fuck has it got to do with us?

I've only been reading for the last 2 pages but I can't see why this forum is being used as battlefield.
We have no great war, no great depression.
Our great war is a spiritual war.
Our great depression is our lives.
JimC wrote:Ratz is just beautiful... :woot:

Where else could you go from the taste of raw egg to licking marmalade off tits in such a short space of time?
Pensioner wrote:I worked for 50 years and that's long enough for anyone, luckily I worked to live not lived for work.
Lozzer wrote:You ain't Scottish unless you live off Chicken nuggets, White Lightening and speak like an incomprehensible cow.

User avatar
maiforpeace
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 15726
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
Location: under the redwood trees

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by maiforpeace » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:40 pm

The Curious Squid wrote:I have a question.

Why the hell are you lot even having this argument on Rationalia? What the fuck has it got to do with us?

I've only been reading for the last 2 pages but I can't see why this forum is being used as battlefield.
:D

That's been a big part of what this discussion is about...from what I surmise by members of RS they are able to have this discussion over there - there was a misconception that such discussion was stifled or locked. So, I agree with you, why isn't it over there?

I'm just speculating, but I think it's not there because the members of RS who are complaining just don't feel comfortable discussing it at RS. They are here at Ratz to blow off steam, then the steam started to burn some members of RS. Those burned members want to correct what they think is a misrepresentation of RS so it's all here. :dono:

So, yes I agree with Paco - for those involved in the argument, why haven't you taken it to RS?
Atheists have always argued that this world is all that we have, and that our duty is to one another to make the very most and best of it. ~Christopher Hitchens~
Image
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/379 ... 3be9_o.jpg[/imgc]

devogue

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by devogue » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:43 pm

Shut it you two.

The drama is too awesome. :hehe:

User avatar
The Curious Squid
Lazy Spic Bastard
Posts: 7648
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:51 pm
About me: a sexually deviant misogynist sexist pig who's into sex trafficking, sexual slavery, murder, bondage, rape and pre-frontal lobotomy of your victims.
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by The Curious Squid » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:44 pm

I just signed up over there to see what the place is like and can't even post at the minute because there's a post approval system :fp: It looks a lot more serious than this place from the get go.
We have no great war, no great depression.
Our great war is a spiritual war.
Our great depression is our lives.
JimC wrote:Ratz is just beautiful... :woot:

Where else could you go from the taste of raw egg to licking marmalade off tits in such a short space of time?
Pensioner wrote:I worked for 50 years and that's long enough for anyone, luckily I worked to live not lived for work.
Lozzer wrote:You ain't Scottish unless you live off Chicken nuggets, White Lightening and speak like an incomprehensible cow.

User avatar
The Curious Squid
Lazy Spic Bastard
Posts: 7648
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:51 pm
About me: a sexually deviant misogynist sexist pig who's into sex trafficking, sexual slavery, murder, bondage, rape and pre-frontal lobotomy of your victims.
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Re: A Possible Change In The Rules - RatSkep tangent

Post by The Curious Squid » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:45 pm

Gertie wrote:Shut it you two.

The drama is too awesome. :hehe:
I don't know why you like this one Dev, it doesn't have the usual air of scandal that you seem to thrive on :biggrin:
We have no great war, no great depression.
Our great war is a spiritual war.
Our great depression is our lives.
JimC wrote:Ratz is just beautiful... :woot:

Where else could you go from the taste of raw egg to licking marmalade off tits in such a short space of time?
Pensioner wrote:I worked for 50 years and that's long enough for anyone, luckily I worked to live not lived for work.
Lozzer wrote:You ain't Scottish unless you live off Chicken nuggets, White Lightening and speak like an incomprehensible cow.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests