
Have I fucked up?
- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
I just nuked the place, tell me if something interesting comes up, deep sea isopod 

- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
Got your twat to admit his position is rigid and nothing or no-one will be able to change it 

- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
GenesForLife wrote:Got your twat to admit his position is rigid and nothing or no-one will be able to change it
I havent posted or looked in for a week. I'm trying to quit.

Now I've just poked me nose in to have a look.

I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
Are you Trubble or Ankurrc? 
Edit: Oh, I've worked it out.

Edit: Oh, I've worked it out.

I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
It is always good to know when a person comes out of uni they are so filled with the truth... LOL

She means "educated" surely. As apposed to "bollocks" like when a person comes out of church.

I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
Mate, can you please post these videos there?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZClfg_k ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=obaZz41 ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZClfg_k ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=obaZz41 ... re=related
Re: Have I fucked up?
That's beautiful...but sadly the likelihood of any of them reading, let alone understanding a small part of it, is indistinguishable from zero.GenesForLife wrote:They're having a few technical problems at the moment, but I have a nice little rat-bomb for them
(and you may have been reading too many of Calilasseia's posts...)


"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
GenesForLife wrote:Mate, can you please post these videos there?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZClfg_k ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=obaZz41 ... re=related
OK, what do you want me to say?
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
Tell them that both the "soul" and belief are fundamentally grounded in the physical brain and not a metaphysical, immaterial soul, as the experiments described in those lectures demonstrate. Also tell them that work by the same scientist has demonstrated that temporal lobe seizures can cause religiosity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIiIsDIkDtg, therefore Godmen are likely to be mental and thus not an indicator of the truth as MonkorNun claims. http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=5z4B5BY ... re=related
Any false victory declarations seen yet? I'm not even going there anymore.
Any false victory declarations seen yet? I'm not even going there anymore.
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
GenesForLife wrote:Tell them that both the "soul" and belief are fundamentally grounded in the physical brain and not a metaphysical, immaterial soul, as the experiments described in those lectures demonstrate. Also tell them that work by the same scientist has demonstrated that temporal lobe seizures can cause religiosity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIiIsDIkDtg, therefore Godmen are likely to be mental and thus not an indicator of the truth as MonkorNun claims. http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=5z4B5BY ... re=related
Any false victory declarations seen yet? I'm not even going there anymore.
Posted.
Monkornun hasn't claimed victory. I don't really think he's the type. huntblairs would if he was around.
Oh, and suddenly monk posted this:
Man is the boss in this world ... and he is following his desires. How could it ever be perfect from his perspective? But what god created was perfect. The planet survived pretty ok on its own for billions of years.


I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
It is a she.
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
GenesForLife wrote:Tell them that both the "soul" and belief are fundamentally grounded in the physical brain and not a metaphysical, immaterial soul, as the experiments described in those lectures demonstrate. Also tell them that work by the same scientist has demonstrated that temporal lobe seizures can cause religiosity http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIiIsDIkDtg, therefore Godmen are likely to be mental and thus not an indicator of the truth as MonkorNun claims. http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=5z4B5BY ... re=related
Any false victory declarations seen yet? I'm not even going there anymore.
Her's her response:-
I disagree these videos show the experiences of someone who has seizures and epilepsy. No God enlightened man had these symptoms.
It is not science in the making but story in the making. History has a list of god enlightened men which I gave you to research. This list is verifiable god enlightend men of the past where you can check if anything like this was ever recorded about them. Assuming is what makes it a story - that makes no sense as it is simply denying the verifiable evidence to justify your story.
Looking for the verifiable evidence makes it real science. That story making idea is in the mind of the evolution writers and skeptics of which the world has many - but true scientists the world has few. Ramachandra even said he cannot verify that these guys saw God. Actually nobody can verify what is the nature of the mind of another that is why it is personal science. You have to know your own mind in order to find God. We can only judge what others do and say. Remember no body can verify the workings inside another person's head you cannot tell me when I choose to be lustful my mind does that out of its own accord.
And we can all verify for ourselves this truth through a process of meditation. God is not a disease of a malfunctioning brain not the work of a drug addict. god is of the same essence as your soul. You just need to be loving in thought word and deed. There is no other requirement except to still the mind which gives it the chance to know the truth about the self and the brain.
This practical science is found with the living Godman who has done it himself. This method is the way the truth and the light spoken about in all religions and practiced by the essoteric and mystical side of all religions. That is where you will find the truth
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
http://pinktentacle.com/2008/12/scienti ... rom-brain/
http://singularityhub.com/2010/03/17/fm ... -at-video/
Tell her that her disagreement does not matter, brain scans can reconstruct what someone is seeing or imagining or thinking about.
http://singularityhub.com/2010/03/17/fm ... -at-video/
Tell her that her disagreement does not matter, brain scans can reconstruct what someone is seeing or imagining or thinking about.
- Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
LOL This is definitely different from Ramachandra's research but an interesting find. I thought you were being serious tho. Although this is good news for science it does not explain where thoughts come from thus generating brain activity, mapping or seeing the brains reactions only proves what I am saying all along, and one day we will be able to see what people desire too, and then scientists will conclude that all these things have been preprogrammed before a person is born into his life if we get that far in science. It would be the new digital mystic meg.GenesForLife wrote:http://pinktentacle.com/2008/12/scienti ... rom-brain/
http://singularityhub.com/2010/03/17/fm ... -at-video/
Tell her that her disagreement does not matter, brain scans can reconstruct what someone is seeing or imagining or thinking about.

I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous 



- GenesForLife
- Bertie Wooster
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Have I fucked up?
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/jour ... 1&SRETRY=0Discussed evidence and assumptions that concern hemispheric laterality and asymmetrical functional representation. It is hypothesized that the asymmetrical linguistic-motor vs. sensory-spatial-affective representation of function may be a result of differential rates of cortical, subcortical and spinal motor-sensory maturation. Evidence with regard to embryological and early postnatal neurological development is reviewed. It is argued that motor areas mature before sensory and that the left hemisphere develops prior to the right, such that the left hemisphere gains a competitive advantage in the acquisition of motor representation, whereas the later maturing right has an advantage in the establishment of sensory-affective synaptic representation, including that of limbic mediation. The influences of these differing maturational events on cognitive and psychic functioning are examined, particularly with regard to limbic influences on the development of language, thought, and mental imagery, and the effects of early emotional experience on later behavior. Thinking is viewed in part as a left hemisphere internalization of egocentric language, the internalization of which corresponds to the increasing maturation of intra-cortical and subcortical structures and fiber pathways, and the myelination of the callosal connections that subserve information transfer between the hemispheres. It is argued that thought is a means of organizing, interpreting, and explaining impulses that arise in the non-linguistic portions of the nervous system so that the language dependent regions may achieve understanding. In addition, the neurodynamics and mechanisms involved in the mislabeling, misinterpretation, and inhibition of impulses, desires, and emotional expression are discussed in relation to disturbances in psychic functioning.
It's all in the neurons, and that has been known right from bloody frickin Nineteen Eighty Two. Morover, being able to visualize desires has nothing to do with it being preprogrammed, it is a bloody non-sequitur of the highest degree of nincompoopery.
And tell her she's committing a logical fallacy, aka inserting rectally extracted blind assertions as the answer to a question under active research, which is fallacious, she also commits the fallacy of presumption or presupposition when ultimately anything could be demonstrated, thereby making it wrong to assert that this will be shown and that will be shown.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests