Simple Mafia 2 Archive

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by charlou » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:05 am

higgs2 wrote:I"m not sure you even understand my logic. That late pm has nothing to do with whether you might be scum or town. I don't think I ever said your posting was idiocy (I assume you mean posting that you hadn't gotten your pm in the peanuts thread?) I am just saying that it has no bearing on whether you are scum or town. Certainly doesn't make you 99% innocent. Am I the only one who thinks that is absurd?
As I said yesterday, I agree that the PM thing has nothing useful to say about Twinkie's role status.


I think virphen's rationale for making the following statement needs a lot more attention:
virphen wrote:1. Twinkie is innocent, almost beyond doubt.
I think it's either a ploy to look innocent by supporting a town person (as Feck suggested), or they're both mafia. The way twinkie has posted about the whole thing seems odd, and the lack of response from virphen to my questions yesterday doesn't look good either.


Higgs2, to answer your question to me, other than the above two players I just mentioned and Normal's posting behaviour as described by Uselesstwit, I can't see anything particularly telling about any of the other players. I also agree with Uselesstwit about Feck's behaviour - probably not scummy, just self-preserving.
no fences

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by Mantisdreamz » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:32 am

My thoughts are this:

I think Charlou, Feck & Twinkie are probably innocent.

Col voted for Charlou straight off the bat on the first day. Twinkie came in and voted Col right away on day 1. Feck's post on day 1 - (the lengthy one) really just seemed like he was fearlessly fooling around because he knows there is nothing to hide. A scum would be more careful, I think.

I was suspicious of higgs2 & Uselesstwit. However, I have just read Useless's post regarding higgs2, so I don't know if they are on the same team. He seemed to be fingering suspicion towards her. However, that could be a ploy since he knows that she has a good chance of getting lynched today. But if it's not a ploy then I'm thinking - the scum team is either:

higgs2 & Normal or

Useless & Normal/virphen.

(I discluded virphen from the first batch since higgs2 has been giving him a lot of guff for what he said about Twinkie).

And that's assuming that the game started with 3 scum.


And, I could be way off... but, that's my list for now.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by Mantisdreamz » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:37 am

Uselesstwit wrote: Mantis, is one of my 3 most likely suspects. I have gotten used to him dropping tells when he's innocent, but this game he just seems a bit off.
she.

And if you don't mind, can I ask what you mean about being a bit off?

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by Feck » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:45 am

I sort of agree with you Charlou and Normal haven't aroused my Suspicions yet. Not sure about the others but I think Virphen and Useless have been making the odd strange post
Mantis not sure of .....If Higgs is not Scum I might as well lynch myself :o
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by irretating » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:48 am

Uselesstwit wrote:Also got defensive when people suggested vir as a scum player.
Charlou wrote:The way twinkie has posted about the whole thing seems odd, and the lack of response from virphen to my questions yesterday doesn't look good either.
See, the thing is, I have not said anywhere that virphen is town. What I've asked for is real reasons to think he's scum. So it's hardly being defensive.


I fail to see how charlou is cleared to any degree. Last game she chopped and changed her lynch votes, FOS'd people, where this game she is doing the minimum required. She is also focusing on this virphen thing and hasn't said anything else other than being very agreeable to uselesstwit. She is definitely on my list of suspects.

Normal might just being going for self-preservation this game (as town), or keeping his head down (as scum). I'd like to hear from him and hear his thinking about everyone's play.

My mostly cleared players are Mantis and Feck, because they are playing town games.

My scum list (most to least suspicious) is:

higgs2
charlou
uselesstwit
normal
virphen
feck
mantis

User avatar
virphen
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:37 am
About me: "that fairy-fingering ass-raping space lizard"

One year own my home planet = 3 on earth.
Location: Orbit.

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by virphen » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:53 am

Charlou wrote: I think virphen's rationale for making the following statement needs a lot more attention:
virphen wrote:1. Twinkie is innocent, almost beyond doubt.
I think it's either a ploy to look innocent by supporting a town person (as Feck suggested), or they're both mafia. The way twinkie has posted about the whole thing seems odd, and the lack of response from virphen to my questions yesterday doesn't look good either.
I didn't respond yesterday as I lost my internet connection for most of the afternoon and only got it back 10 minutes before the end of the round. Twinkie can probably attest to that, given we were in a conversation (not regarding the game of course) when I abruptly disappeared. And if she doesn't, or that is irrelevant given you suspect both of us, you should at least be able to verify that I didn't post either here or on ratskep during that time.

I'm surprised you haven't cottoned on to the other potential reasons 1. that I was so convinced of Twinkie's innocence because I really am scum and thus didn't express any doubt because I didn't have any (there's probably a psychological term for that) or 2. the real reason.

I'll explain 2 on the next game day, if I'm still alive. And if I fail to, go ahead and lynch me.

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by irretating » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:00 am

virphen wrote:Twinkie can probably attest to that, given we were in a conversation (not regarding the game of course) when I abruptly disappeared.
This is indeed true. I was going to say it before, but some people have blinders on (and some people aren't really trying to be helpful to town in this game).

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by charlou » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:10 am

virphen wrote:I'm surprised you haven't cottoned on to the other potential reasons 1. that I was so convinced of Twinkie's innocence because I really am scum and thus didn't express any doubt because I didn't have any (there's probably a psychological term for that) or 2. the real reason.
Well, number one is so obvious it wasn't worth mentioning. ;)
virphen wrote:I'll explain 2 on the next game day, if I'm still alive. And if I fail to, go ahead and lynch me.
Why not explain today? :tea:
no fences

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by Feck » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:14 am

I think I expressed the thought that you might be Scum Virphen ...
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by charlou » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:25 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:I was suspicious of higgs2 & Uselesstwit. However, I have just read Useless's post regarding higgs2, so I don't know if they are on the same team. He seemed to be fingering suspicion towards her. However, that could be a ploy since he knows that she has a good chance of getting lynched today. But if it's not a ploy then I'm thinking - the scum team is either:

higgs2 & Normal or
I think higgs2 has just been doing what she says and trying to scum hunt and generate discussion. As I think virphen is mafia and he has voted for higgs2, that confirms her innocence for me.
no fences

higgs2
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by higgs2 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:28 am

Charlou wrote:
higgs2 wrote:I"m not sure you even understand my logic. That late pm has nothing to do with whether you might be scum or town. I don't think I ever said your posting was idiocy (I assume you mean posting that you hadn't gotten your pm in the peanuts thread?) I am just saying that it has no bearing on whether you are scum or town. Certainly doesn't make you 99% innocent. Am I the only one who thinks that is absurd?
As I said yesterday, I agree that the PM thing has nothing useful to say about Twinkie's role status.


I think virphen's rationale for making the following statement needs a lot more attention:
virphen wrote:1. Twinkie is innocent, almost beyond doubt.
I think it's either a ploy to look innocent by supporting a town person (as Feck suggested), or they're both mafia. The way twinkie has posted about the whole thing seems odd, and the lack of response from virphen to my questions yesterday doesn't look good either.


Higgs2, to answer your question to me, other than the above two players I just mentioned and Normal's posting behaviour as described by Uselesstwit, I can't see anything particularly telling about any of the other players. I also agree with Uselesstwit about Feck's behaviour - probably not scummy, just self-preserving.
I guess maybe I just don't know feck well enough. But he sure looks scummy to me, I'm wondering if Uselesstwit is his scum partner and trying to save him. That will make me look pretty stupid.
Badass Elf

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by charlou » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:36 am

higgs2 wrote:I guess maybe I just don't know feck well enough. But he sure looks scummy to me, I'm wondering if Uselesstwit is his scum partner and trying to save him. That will make me look pretty stupid.
I don't understand why you think Uselesstwit looks scummy because he doesn't agree that Feck looks scummy? Like all of us, Uselesstwit is making assessments about the players based on how he sees their behaviour and doesn't have anything more concrete to say. I think that shows a town lack of knowledge, not mafia certainty.
no fences

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by charlou » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:37 am

Charlou wrote:
higgs2 wrote:I guess maybe I just don't know feck well enough. But he sure looks scummy to me, I'm wondering if Uselesstwit is his scum partner and trying to save him. That will make me look pretty stupid.
I don't understand why you think Uselesstwit looks scummy because he doesn't agree that Feck looks scummy? Like all of us, Uselesstwit is making assessments about the players based on how he sees their behaviour and doesn't have anything more concrete to say. I think that shows a town lack of knowledge, not mafia certainty.
(my bold) Like all of the town players, I mean
no fences

higgs2
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by higgs2 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:43 am

Charlou wrote:
higgs2 wrote:I guess maybe I just don't know feck well enough. But he sure looks scummy to me, I'm wondering if Uselesstwit is his scum partner and trying to save him. That will make me look pretty stupid.
I don't understand why you think Uselesstwit looks scummy because he doesn't agree that Feck looks scummy? Like all of us, Uselesstwit is making assessments about the players based on how he sees their behaviour and doesn't have anything more concrete to say. I think that shows a town lack of knowledge, not mafia certainty.
I hope you're right because I hate looking stupid :D These long days are kind of hard because people start to wifom everything.
Badass Elf

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 3

Post by charlou » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:48 am

Charlou wrote:
higgs2 wrote:I guess maybe I just don't know feck well enough. But he sure looks scummy to me, I'm wondering if Uselesstwit is his scum partner and trying to save him. That will make me look pretty stupid.
I don't understand why you think Uselesstwit looks scummy because he doesn't agree that Feck looks scummy? Like all of us, Uselesstwit is making assessments about the players based on how he sees their behaviour and doesn't have anything more concrete to say. I think that shows a town lack of knowledge, not mafia certainty.
(my bold) Just want to clarify another point here .. I meant because he doesn't agree with you that Feck looks scummy ... I've already agreed with Uselesstwit about Fecks behaviour.
no fences

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests