Simple Mafia 2 Archive

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
higgs2
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by higgs2 » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:05 am

higgs2 wrote:
higgs2 wrote:
Uselesstwit wrote:
Twinkie wrote:FoS both uselesstwit and higgs2, for thinking that charlou is put in the clear by colubridae voting for her for a matter of minutes on day 1.

Most suspicious people so far:
uselesstwit (he was mvp last game AND voted mayor so why was he not killed last night)
higgs2 (agreeing with uselesstwit's 'clearing' of charlou)
charlou (mainly because the above two are making her out to be an established innocent)

Magicziggy, if you're town your list of suspicious characters would be helpful to town.
Intresting, mantis is the one who actually pointed that out, but he's not on your list. I do notice you're playing a very different game this time, so I'm going to agree with vir. that you're probably clean.
Higgs, is actually raising some alarm bells with me also. She's being more chatty and less decisive than I'm used to seeing.
Everyone else is still pretty much it the don't trust but don't lynch either area.
LOL try hanging out in here alone and you would get chatty too.

Most trusted'

Uselesstwit
Ghat?

Not sure
charlou
normal

Twinkle

Suspicious
virphen
feck
magickziggy
mantis
I'm moving twinkle down to not sure and verphin down to suspicious.
Okay, keeping my list about the same, although charlou has posted a sensible post and so I would tend to increase her towards the top category.

There are clearly some Pretty scummy options,and not all of them can be scum. I will keep my vote on magickziggy who was consistently scummy and then left. From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Badass Elf

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:06 am

higgs2 wrote:
Twinkie wrote:I think higgs2 is dropping scum tells all over the place (not least of which doing some major focus on me, simply because I've FoS'd her).

It looks like magicziggy is in for the chop anyway, but I want my vote to be on the player most suspicious at the moment and that's higgs2

unvote vote higgs2
Focusing on you because you seem to be at least partially cleared if not more. Focusing on people is not a scum tell lol!
Keep in mind Twinkie was one of the first to vote for col yesterday.

Maybe Feck is getting defensive because he really is town. Getting defensive isn't necessarily a scum tell, or anything like that. That rule isn't infallible.

higgs2
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by higgs2 » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:09 am

Feck was defensive yesterday.
Badass Elf

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:11 am

higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Also, if virphen & Twinkie were on the same team - I highly doubt that one of the team member's would come out stating close to 100% trust in the other. They'd want to keep as far away as possible.... possibly.

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by irretating » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:13 am

higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
I am keeping my FoS (and vote, for that matter) on higgs2. We are not 'finding' anything out about me. I did a stupid n00b thing by posting my lack of PM in the thread instead of PMing oblivion directly :fp: . I don't want to be cleared based on my stupidity, but that's what virphen has realised. He could be scum, but his realisation of my innocence is NOT grounds for suspicion. Higgs2's lack of realisation of my innocence, given she's a very seasoned player, IS grounds for suspicion. She's digging a big hole for herself by going after virphen (and attempting to go after me) on that basis.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:14 am

higgs2 wrote:Feck was defensive yesterday.
It just seems like he is being free in speech.

I know for myself, that is how I have been in the past when I am innocent.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:14 am

In reference to yesterday.

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by irretating » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:16 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:
higgs2 wrote:Feck was defensive yesterday.
It just seems like he is being free in speech.

I know for myself, that is how I have been in the past when I am innocent.
Feck tends to stand by his innocence when he's innocent. I played scum with him last time and he played very differently.

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Feck » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:19 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:
higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Also, if virphen & Twinkie were on the same team - I highly doubt that one of the team member's would come out stating close to 100% trust in the other. They'd want to keep as far away as possible.... possibly.

No sensible Scum would say anything like that :nono: It could be a double bluff ,but I think it hints that they are not both scum .

Innocence is confusing for Feck :fp:
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:24 am

Feck wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:
higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Also, if virphen & Twinkie were on the same team - I highly doubt that one of the team member's would come out stating close to 100% trust in the other. They'd want to keep as far away as possible.... possibly.

No sensible Scum would say anything like that :nono: It could be a double bluff ,but I think it hints that they are not both scum .
I don't think it necessarily hints that they are both not scum. I think it hints that they are either both innocents. Or one is scum.

But to try and use this as suspicion on virphen because he said this, seems a bit far fetched as I really don't think scum would state such trust with one another on the thread.

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by charlou » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:28 am

Twinkie wrote:
higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
I am keeping my FoS (and vote, for that matter) on higgs2. We are not 'finding' anything out about me. I did a stupid n00b thing by posting my lack of PM in the thread instead of PMing oblivion directly :fp: . I don't want to be cleared based on my stupidity, but that's what virphen has realised. He could be scum, but his realisation of my innocence is NOT grounds for suspicion. Higgs2's lack of realisation of my innocence, given she's a very seasoned player, IS grounds for suspicion. She's digging a big hole for herself by going after virphen (and attempting to go after me) on that basis.
My bold. I agree .. why would he make a point of defending twinkie's possible innocence if he were mafia? One reason might be because they're both mafia ... But I don't think that virphen, who's an experienced player, would do something so obviously likely to draw suspicion to himself and twinkie, would he?

Oh, I see a few others are agreed on this point. I'll just add that, while it's unlikely, I wouldn't discount it altogether.
no fences

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Feck » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:35 am

Mantisdreamz wrote:
Feck wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:
higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Also, if virphen & Twinkie were on the same team - I highly doubt that one of the team member's would come out stating close to 100% trust in the other. They'd want to keep as far away as possible.... possibly.

No sensible Scum would say anything like that :nono: It could be a double bluff ,but I think it hints that they are not both scum .
I don't think it necessarily hints that they are both not scum. I think it hints that they are either both innocents. Or one is scum.

But to try and use this as suspicion on virphen because he said this, seems a bit far fetched as I really don't think scum would state such trust with one another on the thread.
What I said can't see them both being scum, one scum maybe ... but I think not either of them
mind you as scum..supporting an innocent early on in the game is a good plan ....the more you associate your self with an innocent the more likely it is to rub off on you.
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32528
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by charlou » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:42 am

Feck wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:
higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Also, if virphen & Twinkie were on the same team - I highly doubt that one of the team member's would come out stating close to 100% trust in the other. They'd want to keep as far away as possible.... possibly.

No sensible Scum would say anything like that :nono: It could be a double bluff ,but I think it hints that they are not both scum .

Innocence is confusing for Feck :fp:
It hints that virphen isn't scum, but if that's the case it doesn't really say anything about twinkie's role. If virphen is innocent he can't know what twinkie's role is, only guess. Why he stated it with so much conviction remains to be seen ... virphen, would you explain why you said the following
1. Twinkie is innocent, almost beyond doubt.
Could it be this:
Feck wrote:mind you as scum..supporting an innocent early on in the game is a good plan ....the more you associate your self with an innocent the more likely it is to rub off on you.
hmmm ...
no fences

irretating
not too sweet to sledge
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 am
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by irretating » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:00 am

virphen a) is very clever and b) has GM'd a number of mafia games. It's obvious to me why he posted what he did.

User avatar
Uselesstwit
Posts: 2290
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am
Contact:

Re: Simple Mafia 2 - Day 2

Post by Uselesstwit » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:10 am

Feck wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:
Feck wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:
higgs2 wrote: From what we're finding out about Twinkle, I am getting more suspicious of virphen. The posters here are not that gullible, it seems scumm to try to pull one over on them with a 100% cleared Twinkle theory.
Also, if virphen & Twinkie were on the same team - I highly doubt that one of the team member's would come out stating close to 100% trust in the other. They'd want to keep as far away as possible.... possibly.

No sensible Scum would say anything like that :nono: It could be a double bluff ,but I think it hints that they are not both scum .
I don't think it necessarily hints that they are both not scum. I think it hints that they are either both innocents. Or one is scum.

But to try and use this as suspicion on virphen because he said this, seems a bit far fetched as I really don't think scum would state such trust with one another on the thread.
What I said can't see them both being scum, one scum maybe ... but I think not either of them
mind you as scum..supporting an innocent early on in the game is a good plan ....the more you associate your self with an innocent the more likely it is to rub off on you.
I was just thinking the same thing. Virphen is more than clever enough to tell an innocent she's cleared for the sole purpose of gaining support for his own innocence. Like I said, twinkie is probably clear, but it in no way says anything about virphen.
irretating wrote:you're a genius, UT!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests