-
Feck
- .

- Posts: 28391
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Feck » Fri May 07, 2010 7:05 pm
Elessarina wrote:Pappa wrote:Elessarina wrote:
And Plaid Cymru want 300 million because they think they've been short-changed... .... erm.. yeah ok..
Plaid do have some pretty good reasons for asking for that 300 million. Firstly, they're not asking for any of the other 3 billion that's being cut, they just want the 0.3 billion. The reason they're asking for that figure is because that's the amount the independent Holtham Commission says Wales should have, the amount is also and backed up by the recent budget report.
They're not trying to get more money, just the fair share.
Sorry Pappa but if Wales wants their own parliament they should have that and manage themselves. Having Wales and Scotland involved in an English election where members actions do not affect their own constituents and have influence over what happens in England is an unfair system. Wales and Scotland have no prescription charges yet we do in England still there are other issues as well. The whole system is fucked up
Welsh or Scottish MP's should not vote on issues that have been devolved to their respective parliaments but Westminster decides many things for Scotland and Wales . A lot of people still think it unfair that England keeps voting the Tories in down there ...... thank you for Thatcher BTW
On 1st April 2010, the cost of an NHS prescription was reduced to £3.00 per item. The reduced Scottish prescription charge will apply only to Scottish prescriptions dispensed in Scotland.
-
RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
-
Contact:
Post
by RuleBritannia » Fri May 07, 2010 7:22 pm
In fact it's the policy of the SNP to not vote on issues that don't effect Scotland.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
-
Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
-
Contact:
Post
by Pappa » Fri May 07, 2010 7:31 pm
RuleBritannia wrote:In fact it's the policy of the SNP to not vote on issues that don't effect Scotland.
I agree with their policy, but I did also wonder earlier about the idea of actually disallowing them... a Cornish MP would expect to vote on an issue effecting only Northumbria, so why shouldn't a Scottish MP too?[/devil's advocate]
-
RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
-
Contact:
Post
by RuleBritannia » Fri May 07, 2010 7:53 pm
Pappa wrote:RuleBritannia wrote:In fact it's the policy of the SNP to not vote on issues that don't effect Scotland.
I agree with their policy, but I did also wonder earlier about the idea of actually disallowing them... a Cornish MP would expect to vote on an issue effecting only Northumbria, so why shouldn't a Scottish MP too?[/devil's advocate]
The West Lothian Question's been messed for a long time, but none of the "main parties" seem to care much.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
-
RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
-
Contact:
Post
by RuleBritannia » Fri May 07, 2010 8:15 pm
Another bizarre hurdle of the English votes on English laws situation, is that if the Prime Minister (as is with Gordon Brown) or cabinet ministers are not an English constituents, then they can't can't vote on English laws, even though they actually live in England and are effected by those laws.
There's also the matter of the fact that Wales and England actually have a combined legal system. And there doesn't seem to be much support for either full Welsh autonomy (like Scotland), or an English parliament.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
-
Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
-
Contact:
Post
by Rum » Fri May 07, 2010 8:26 pm
May I suggest that a mod merges this thread with the 'The now the election is over the fun starts thread'. I thought they would diverge but they ain't.
-
Horwood Beer-Master
- "...a complete Kentish hog"
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
- Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
-
Contact:
Post
by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri May 07, 2010 9:17 pm
I say we just cut the Celtic fringe loose if they try to leech off us, see how they like that.

-
Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
-
Contact:
Post
by Pappa » Fri May 07, 2010 9:18 pm
Horwood Beer-Master wrote:I say we just cut the Celtic fringe loose if they try to leech off us, see how they like that.

Fine by me.
Do Scotland get to keep their oil and Wales their water?

-
Azathoth
- blind idiot god

- Posts: 9418
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:31 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Azathoth » Fri May 07, 2010 9:20 pm
Good luck without north sea oil and gas and welsh water
Outside the ordered universe is that amorphous blight of nethermost confusion which blasphemes and bubbles at the center of all infinity—the boundless daemon sultan Azathoth, whose name no lips dare speak aloud, and who gnaws hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
Code: Select all
// Replaces with spaces the braces in cases where braces in places cause stasis
$str = str_replace(array("\{","\}")," ",$str);
-
Horwood Beer-Master
- "...a complete Kentish hog"
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
- Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
-
Contact:
Post
by Horwood Beer-Master » Fri May 07, 2010 9:23 pm
Pappa wrote:Horwood Beer-Master wrote:I say we just cut the Celtic fringe loose if they try to leech off us, see how they like that.

Fine by me.
Do Scotland get to keep their oil and Wales their water?

Scotland has no oil left, and no Welsh water ever makes it as far over as Kent, so sure, fine.
If the Midlands dries-up I'll just bail-out of this craphole and sod-off back to civilisation (which has it's own water shortage problems, but not ones Wales is likely to help with).
-
Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril

- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
-
Contact:
Post
by Elessarina » Fri May 07, 2010 10:02 pm
BIGOT: Brown Is Gone On Thursday
It's all Sue's fault!

-
Deep Sea Isopod
- Bathynomus giganteus
- Posts: 7806
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
- Location: Gods blind spot.
-
Contact:
Post
by Deep Sea Isopod » Sat May 08, 2010 10:22 am
Pappa wrote:Horwood Beer-Master wrote:I say we just cut the Celtic fringe loose if they try to leech off us, see how they like that.

Fine by me.
Do Scotland get to keep their oil and Wales their water?

And Cornwall can keep it's pasties.
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous

-
JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74213
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Contact:
Post
by JimC » Sat May 08, 2010 10:25 am
At last, Great Britain will get to experience the joys of Italian-style politics!

Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
-
CJ
- Posts: 8436
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
- Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Post
by CJ » Sat May 08, 2010 12:05 pm
If we had been running a Proportional Representation model this would have been the outcome (making the huge assumption that the electorate behaved the same if offered a PR system). The top 3 parties, in any combination, would form a huge percentage of the seats and lock out any other combination. Interestingly UKIP and the BNP would be the 4th and 5th respectively taking 32 seats between them. I think that says a lot about some groundswell opinions in the UK.

-
ficklefiend
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
-
Contact:
Post
by ficklefiend » Sat May 08, 2010 12:12 pm
CJ wrote:If we had been running a Proportional Representation model this would have been the outcome (making the huge assumption that the electorate behaved the same if offered a PR system). The top 3 parties, in any combination, would form a huge percentage of the seats and lock out any other combination. Interestingly UKIP and the BNP would be the 4th and 5th respectively taking 32 seats between them. I think that says a lot about some groundswell opinions in the UK.
Ugh, that's about enough to put me off. Although, surely changing the system would change the ways the parties operate too - the BNP seem to have spread themselves right across the country this election. I didn't even know they would be standing in my constituency. If it was just most votes=most seats, then would every party would do the same and spread themselves absolutely as wide as possible?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests