Of course. But it would be the only thing left ...Geoff wrote:Except that Lib-Lab still wouldn't have a majority.klr wrote: Then the next "obvious" option would be Labour+Lib Dem, which might by then be the only valid option.
The UK election thread
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Lab-Tory.klr wrote:Of course. But it would be the only thing left ...Geoff wrote:Except that Lib-Lab still wouldn't have a majority.klr wrote: Then the next "obvious" option would be Labour+Lib Dem, which might by then be the only valid option.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
Re: The UK election thread
Pappa wrote:Lab-Tory.klr wrote:Of course. But it would be the only thing left ...Geoff wrote:Except that Lib-Lab still wouldn't have a majority.klr wrote: Then the next "obvious" option would be Labour+Lib Dem, which might by then be the only valid option.
- klr
- (%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
- Posts: 32964
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
- About me: The money was just resting in my account.
- Location: Airstrip Two
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
I imagine there's a better chance of a formation of pigs flying over Mecca than this happening, but you never know ...beige wrote:Pappa wrote:Lab-Tory.klr wrote:Of course. But it would be the only thing left ...Geoff wrote:Except that Lib-Lab still wouldn't have a majority.klr wrote: Then the next "obvious" option would be Labour+Lib Dem, which might by then be the only valid option.Considering their convergence in policy, that might be a viable alternative.
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner
The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson
- Clinton Huxley
- 19th century monkeybitch.
- Posts: 23746
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Haha, Lab-Tory Pact - would be almost worth doing just to piss off the Lib Dems. Almost.
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
http://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"
AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!
Re: The UK election thread
Con: 10,681,417/305 - 35,021 vps
Lab: 8,601,441/258 - 33,333 vps
Lib: 6,805,66/57 - 119,397 vps
That gives:
Con: 36.1% vote for 44% seats.
Lab: 29.1% vote for 39.6% seats.
Lib: 23% vote for 8.7% seats.
That makes one convservative vote worth 3.409 liberal votes, and one labour vote worth 3.58 liberal ones.
and they wonder why young people don't bother voting.
What's the fucking point. Mindless fucking mainstream media partisanship wins out in the end anyway.
Lab: 8,601,441/258 - 33,333 vps
Lib: 6,805,66/57 - 119,397 vps
That gives:
Con: 36.1% vote for 44% seats.
Lab: 29.1% vote for 39.6% seats.
Lib: 23% vote for 8.7% seats.
That makes one convservative vote worth 3.409 liberal votes, and one labour vote worth 3.58 liberal ones.
What's the fucking point. Mindless fucking mainstream media partisanship wins out in the end anyway.
Re: The UK election thread
However, Lib has the power there for one reason - they're the majority holders. Neither Labor nor Conservatives hold a large enough majority, so any policies will need the support of the liberals.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."
- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Well the election is over, 649 out of 650 seats have been decided (the final constituency election is on May 27).
306 Conservative
258 Labour
057 Liberal Democrat
The magic number is 326. But but bare in mind that Sinn Fein don't take their seats (of shich they won five), and the Speaker, as theoretical political neutral, doesn't vote on legislation. So in reality there are only 644 seats (643 currently), meaning the magic number would be 323.
The SDLP (won 3 seats) takes the Labour whip in the Commons and so can added to the Labour tally I think. And the DUP (won 8 seats) is likely to side with the Tories.
A combined Labour, Liberal Democrat and SDLP would be 318 seats. And a combined Tory and DUP would be 314 seats.
Although in the popular vote it would be 36.7% (Con) to 52.4% (Lib/Lab).
Which pretty much leaves the ballance of power in the hands of the Plaid Cymru-SNP "alliance", with the combined total of 9 seats. Whom, I think, would not enter formal coalition with either side, but are more likely to vote with Lib/Lab on an issue-by-issue case.
So I think the parliament is pretty much as "hung" as it could possibly be.
306 Conservative
258 Labour
057 Liberal Democrat
The magic number is 326. But but bare in mind that Sinn Fein don't take their seats (of shich they won five), and the Speaker, as theoretical political neutral, doesn't vote on legislation. So in reality there are only 644 seats (643 currently), meaning the magic number would be 323.
The SDLP (won 3 seats) takes the Labour whip in the Commons and so can added to the Labour tally I think. And the DUP (won 8 seats) is likely to side with the Tories.
A combined Labour, Liberal Democrat and SDLP would be 318 seats. And a combined Tory and DUP would be 314 seats.
Although in the popular vote it would be 36.7% (Con) to 52.4% (Lib/Lab).
Which pretty much leaves the ballance of power in the hands of the Plaid Cymru-SNP "alliance", with the combined total of 9 seats. Whom, I think, would not enter formal coalition with either side, but are more likely to vote with Lib/Lab on an issue-by-issue case.
So I think the parliament is pretty much as "hung" as it could possibly be.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
- Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril

- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
And Plaid Cymru want 300 million because they think they've been short-changed... .... erm.. yeah ok..RuleBritannia wrote:Well the election is over, 649 out of 650 seats have been decided (the final constituency election is on May 27).
306 Conservative
258 Labour
057 Liberal Democrat
Which pretty much leaves the ballance of power in the hands of the Plaid Cymru-SNP "alliance", with the combined total of 9 seats. Whom, I think, would not enter formal coalition with either side, but are more likely to vote with Lib/Lab on an issue-by-issue case.
So I think the parliament is pretty much as "hung" as it could possibly be.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Plaid do have some pretty good reasons for asking for that 300 million. Firstly, they're not asking for any of the other 3 billion that's being cut, they just want the 0.3 billion. The reason they're asking for that figure is because that's the amount the independent Holtham Commission says Wales should have, the amount is also and backed up by the recent budget report.Elessarina wrote:
And Plaid Cymru want 300 million because they think they've been short-changed... .... erm.. yeah ok..
They're not trying to get more money, just the fair share.
Re: The UK election thread
Which means the government can't do anything.RuleBritannia wrote: So I think the parliament is pretty much as "hung" as it could possibly be.
Sounds good to me...

"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
- Elessarina
- Bearer of Anduril

- Posts: 9517
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
- About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
- Location: Rivendell
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Pappa wrote:Plaid do have some pretty good reasons for asking for that 300 million. Firstly, they're not asking for any of the other 3 billion that's being cut, they just want the 0.3 billion. The reason they're asking for that figure is because that's the amount the independent Holtham Commission says Wales should have, the amount is also and backed up by the recent budget report.Elessarina wrote:
And Plaid Cymru want 300 million because they think they've been short-changed... .... erm.. yeah ok..
They're not trying to get more money, just the fair share.
Sorry Pappa but if Wales wants their own parliament they should have that and manage themselves. Having Wales and Scotland involved in an English election where members actions do not affect their own constituents and have influence over what happens in England is an unfair system. Wales and Scotland have no prescription charges yet we do in England still there are other issues as well. The whole system is fucked up
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Well, as far as I know Wales doesn't want it's own parliament as yet. Maybe we will want that one day, but it doesn't seem to be all that popular at this time.Elessarina wrote:Sorry Pappa but if Wales wants their own parliament they should have that and manage themselves. Having Wales and Scotland involved in an English election where members actions do not affect their own constituents and have influence over what happens in England is an unfair system. Wales and Scotland have no prescription charges yet we do in England still there are other issues as well. The whole system is fucked up
We have free prescriptions, but the money comes out of our health budget, not some extra pot. We choose to lose out elsewhere. That's the point of the autonomy we have in Wales, a level of self-determination.
Plaid are asking for a fair deduction, not extra money. Just because it's the nationalist party that's asking for it, it doesn't mean it's wrong. Who else is going to press for a fair budget in Wales? Not any of the welsh MPs from the main Westminster parties, they'll always tow the party line.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist

- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
Plus it's not an "English election".
- RuleBritannia
- Cupid is a cunt!
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
- About me: About you
- Location: The Machine
- Contact:
Re: The UK election thread
From BBC:
If you think David Cameron is frustrated at finding himself without a majority, spare a thought for poor Great Yarmouth council candidate Bob Peck. Tied on 1,034 votes with Labour opponent Charlie Marsden, he was offered a pack of cards by the returning officer and told the candidate who drew the highest number would win. Mr Peck picked a three while his rival drew a lucky seven to claim the seat. Barmy? Maybe, but it's all within the rules.

If you think David Cameron is frustrated at finding himself without a majority, spare a thought for poor Great Yarmouth council candidate Bob Peck. Tied on 1,034 votes with Labour opponent Charlie Marsden, he was offered a pack of cards by the returning officer and told the candidate who drew the highest number would win. Mr Peck picked a three while his rival drew a lucky seven to claim the seat. Barmy? Maybe, but it's all within the rules.
RuleBritannia © MMXI
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests