Evidence for Allah - contains images which may disturb

[Bella Fortuna]

Thinking Aloud, please dont do it here mate. women are watching. bare them in mind.

Since I am one, and you are many, please bare with me. I am busy person.

Mandy:
"God is Absolute. He is Supreme Engery that has always existed. No beginning. No End. Eternal. Independent of everything. Absolute. Incomprable. If you accept first law of Thermodynamics, then you ought to have no problem that God is forever too."

First Law states " The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings."

I think you mean the second law Mandy ?

thank you mate. i did mean the second law. i learned in class that total amount of energy un the whole universe stays the same. no one can destory any of it and no one can make any more of it. it is set at exactly the amount Allah has set. no adding and no deleting of enegry can happen now. that means energy is forever from beginning to the end. forever is scientific law. it comes from physics. so if you agree with physics you agree with Allah.

see that is nice logical evidence i gave you there. it is based on science. but i know some of you are so stubborn, i mean soooo stubborn, you are gonna still reject it.

like i said, i got 5 proofs of God i am gonna give you in this thread. up to now i gave you two proof. well, a bit more actually if you add this one. so its two and a half proofs for God. this thermodynamics law is half an evidence. its not among my 5 evidences. they are gonna be posted in full one by one.

Its like the law of energy. It has always been around. It can neither be created nor destroyed.

I think that law fits God like a glove.

God is Absolute. He is Supreme Engery that has always existed.
No beginning. No End. Eternal. Independent of everything. Absolute. Incomprable.

If you accept first law of Thermodynamics, then you ought to have no problem that God is forever too.

[CJ]

CJ... this is a personal attack:

Collective evidence of the mental state of Mandleson based on the four characteristics previously identified as potentially leading to susceptibility to religious memes.

Ignorance 8/10

• Mandy has demonstrated his ignorance with his poor English, his lack of understanding of Evolution and the operation of the Scientific Method.

Stupidity 9/10

• Mandy has demonstrated his stupidity by failing to take on board logical arguments that have been carefully presented. In addition he continues to make unsupportable assertions.

Gullibility 10/10

• Mandy continues to swallow the dogma of institutionalised superstition (religion) without the slightest critical thought or comment. He has swallowed the Allah myth hook, line and sinker.

Greed, unknown

• Mandy has demonstrated no qualities that would lead me to think that he is greedy.

Mandy, go and seek psychiatric help, you need it.

and so is this:

That's awfully generous. I think it fell from 2 to zero a long time ago.

I am a naturally generous person! I wouldn't want to upset our ignorant, stupid, gullible and delusional little troll.

You knew in advance that they were personal attacks and against the rules. Please stop it.

How can one personally attack a troll or a poe? A troll is asking for it, they have effectively outlawed themselves by being a troll in the first place, and a poe has a disguise on so how can it be a personal attack? So are the staff of the opinion that Mandy is a Troll or Poe? If so you (on behalf of the staff) could not legitimately ask me not to make personal attacks? If the staff do think Mandy is a Troll or Poe why has nothing been done about it?

[Pappa]

I've answered these questions before CJ. I'd you read the rules over you'll find answers to your questions.

[CJ]

I've answered these questions before CJ. I'd you read the rules over you'll find answers to your questions.

No you haven't answered these questions. So I'll ask you directly. Do you think Mandy is a Troll? Do you think Mandy is Poe? It won't hurt you to reiterate your position here.

[Trolldor]

Speculation means nothing. Until it is substantiated the same rules apply.

[Pappa]

Speculation means nothing. Until it is substantiated the same rules apply.

What he said.

[CJ]

Speculation means nothing. Until it is substantiated the same rules apply.

I'm asking Pappa for his opinion, he has one I'm sure.

[Rum]

[Trolldor]

And his opinion is irrelevant, quite frankly.

You know, mandy - if a troll at all - was a fail troll. What's amused me is that this community is so volatile that it trolled itself.

[CJ]

Speculation means nothing. Until it is substantiated the same rules apply.

What he said.

Pappa I asked you a couple of simple questions. Do you think Mandy is a troll? Do you think Mandy is Poe? Simple questions only require simple answers, a Yes or No in each case would be fine. Please answer my questions.

[Pappa]

Speculation means nothing. Until it is substantiated the same rules apply.

I'm asking Pappa for his opinion, he has one I'm sure.

My opinion doesn't greatly matter Chris. I have one, it's mostly "I don't know".

Whatever answer I gave wouldn't change the fact that all members are protected by the rules. You seem to have great dificulty understanding that you are not exempt from them when you get worked up about something.

To answer your earlier question. I think you are just playing word games with the concept of "person". Mandy is a "member" and covered by the rules as they stand.

[CJ]

And his opinion is irrelevant, quite frankly.

You know, mandy - if a troll at all - was a fail troll. What's amused me is that this community is so volatile that it trolled itself.

No but his actions are questionable as my original post was not a personal attack as in the opinion of the majority of people here Mandy is a Troll and may be a poe. XC has said so himself and not been sanctioned for it by the staff, which shows they must agree with XC. So why have the staff failed to act to protect the membership from Troll activity? It's not like nobody has pointed out Mandy is behaving like a Troll is it? Whole threads have been started abut it haven't they?

[Trolldor]

And yet, mandy is not behaving like a troll at all. I mean, the way you're behaving over it now gives credence to the idea, though I suspect that's more of a self-imposed issue

[CJ]

Speculation means nothing. Until it is substantiated the same rules apply.

I'm asking Pappa for his opinion, he has one I'm sure.

My opinion doesn't greatly matter Chris. I have one, it's mostly "I don't know".

Fair enough.

Whatever answer I gave wouldn't change the fact that all members are protected by the rules. You seem to have great dificulty understanding that you are not exempt from them when you get worked up about something.

I have no difficulty understanding the rules Pappa and I do not feel any exemption from them.

To answer your earlier question. I think you are just playing word games with the concept of "person". Mandy is a "member" and covered by the rules as they stand.

Person or member and synonymous in this case and I'm not that worried about which is which.

[CJ]

And yet, mandy is not behaving like a troll at all. I mean, the way you're behaving over it now gives credence to the idea, though I suspect that's more of a self-imposed issue

I'll just leave this here as a reminder of just how stupid your behaviour can be at times.