I gave up on Heroes when I realised it was just a way of selling ads and merchandise to farmed consumers... just like Lost.Link wrote:Continuity in Heroes
I can suspend disbelief with regards to the superpowers but there are so many continuity issues in that program caused by inattentive writing of time travel story arcs that it just gets silly. I don't even know why I'm still watching it
Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film.
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
- Link
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:19 pm
- About me: I'm here to save the princess Zelda
- Location: Shakespeareville
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Alas i can't seem to quit now I'm this invested, I've watched all of Lost and have only 5 or 6 episodes left and I'm glad I stuck with it. But Heroes is like that book you wish you'd never started; you struggled to the half way point before putting it down but it always nags at the back of your mind that one day you'll have to finish it.Pappa wrote:I gave up on Heroes when I realised it was just a way of selling ads and merchandise to farmed consumers... just like Lost.Link wrote:Continuity in Heroes
I can suspend disbelief with regards to the superpowers but there are so many continuity issues in that program caused by inattentive writing of time travel story arcs that it just gets silly. I don't even know why I'm still watching it

Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
No. Not "of course". That's the point. For them to be walking around on the ship they need artificial gravity. If the gravity is artificial it doesn't matter what way around the ship is in space or if it banks or flips, you still stay on the floor.born-again-atheist wrote:Artifical gravity, of course.Psychoserenity wrote:Reminds me of Star Wars when a ship is in free fall towards a planet and tips up, and everyone falls down in the ship, rather than appearing to float.Animavore wrote:Oh and everyone sliding along to ground to port side when the ship banked in space in Wall-E really annoyed me.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
So it would have been more fun to watch them walk around "like a fly on the wall" than to fall like a house of cards?Animavore wrote:No. Not "of course". That's the point. For them to be walking around on the ship they need artificial gravity. If the gravity is artificial it doesn't matter what way around the ship is in space or if it banks or flips, you still stay on the floor.born-again-atheist wrote:Artifical gravity, of course.Psychoserenity wrote:Reminds me of Star Wars when a ship is in free fall towards a planet and tips up, and everyone falls down in the ship, rather than appearing to float.Animavore wrote:Oh and everyone sliding along to ground to port side when the ship banked in space in Wall-E really annoyed me.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
How about "Independence Day"? A computer virus written for terrestrial computers "just happens" to work on alien computer systems. And the aliens don't run A/V software, of course.
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
No. What I'm saying is that if the ship turned right upside down you would still be standing on the floor. Even if the ship doing fucking cartwheels through space you remain on the floor, sure it might be disorientating to look out the window but if you look the other way it is as if nothing is happening.Gawdzilla wrote:So it would have been more fun to watch them walk around "like a fly on the wall" than to fall like a house of cards?Animavore wrote:No. Not "of course". That's the point. For them to be walking around on the ship they need artificial gravity. If the gravity is artificial it doesn't matter what way around the ship is in space or if it banks or flips, you still stay on the floor.born-again-atheist wrote:Artifical gravity, of course.Psychoserenity wrote:Reminds me of Star Wars when a ship is in free fall towards a planet and tips up, and everyone falls down in the ship, rather than appearing to float.Animavore wrote:Oh and everyone sliding along to ground to port side when the ship banked in space in Wall-E really annoyed me.
And this thread is called scientific revisionism, it's nothing to do with which is more fun, loud explosions are more fun than silence in a vacuum which is why they have them.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
If I had addressed the issue I would have been staying on topic. That would have gotten me an ASBO.Animavore wrote:No. What I'm saying is that if the ship turned right upside down you would still be standing on the floor. Even if the ship doing fucking cartwheels through space you remain on the floor, sure it might be disorientating to look out the window but if you look the other way it is as if nothing is happening.
And this thread is called scientific revisionism, it's nothing to do with which is more fun, loud explosions are more fun than silence in a vacuum which is why they have them.

- colubridae
- Custom Rank: Rank
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
- About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
- Location: Birmingham art gallery
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
I think you need to ask farsight.Gawdzilla wrote:If I had addressed the issue I would have been staying on topic. That would have gotten me an ASBO.Animavore wrote:No. What I'm saying is that if the ship turned right upside down you would still be standing on the floor. Even if the ship doing fucking cartwheels through space you remain on the floor, sure it might be disorientating to look out the window but if you look the other way it is as if nothing is happening.
And this thread is called scientific revisionism, it's nothing to do with which is more fun, loud explosions are more fun than silence in a vacuum which is why they have them.



I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders
- owtth
- The Enchanter
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:21 pm
- About me: Well y'know
- Location: Barcelona
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
You're confusing artificial gravity with inertial dampers [/nerd]Animavore wrote: No. What I'm saying is that if the ship turned right upside down you would still be standing on the floor. Even if the ship doing fucking cartwheels through space you remain on the floor, sure it might be disorientating to look out the window but if you look the other way it is as if nothing is happening.
And this thread is called scientific revisionism, it's nothing to do with which is more fun, loud explosions are more fun than silence in a vacuum which is why they have them.
At least I'm housebroken.
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
In 28 Days Later - the "zombies" are supposedly infected with a virus that makes them super aggressive and angry. And yet they never attack each other, only non-infected people.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Brainssssssssss!Arse wrote:In 28 Days Later - the "zombies" are supposedly infected with a virus that makes them super aggressive and angry. And yet they never attack each other, only non-infected people.
- colubridae
- Custom Rank: Rank
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
- About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
- Location: Birmingham art gallery
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Phrases on stun...owtth wrote:You're confusing artificial gravity with inertial dampers [/nerd]Animavore wrote: No. What I'm saying is that if the ship turned right upside down you would still be standing on the floor. Even if the ship doing fucking cartwheels through space you remain on the floor, sure it might be disorientating to look out the window but if you look the other way it is as if nothing is happening.
And this thread is called scientific revisionism, it's nothing to do with which is more fun, loud explosions are more fun than silence in a vacuum which is why they have them.

I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders
- Pappa
- Non-Practicing Anarchist
- Posts: 56488
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
- About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
- Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
That could be a function of the virus... to help spread it more effectively.Arse wrote:In 28 Days Later - the "zombies" are supposedly infected with a virus that makes them super aggressive and angry. And yet they never attack each other, only non-infected people.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.
When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
In "Resident Evil III" the zombies can live off anything/nothing forever. How's that work again?
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Hmmm....okay. How about T2 then? Nothing dead is supposed to travel through time, so how did the T-1000, which is made of liquid metal, get through?Pappa wrote:That could be a function of the virus... to help spread it more effectively.Arse wrote:In 28 Days Later - the "zombies" are supposedly infected with a virus that makes them super aggressive and angry. And yet they never attack each other, only non-infected people.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest