Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film.
-
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film.
Idea shamelessly stolen from Pappa's thread.
Most science fiction is completely forgiveable on the basis that "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". And usually most people are perfectly happy to go along with the whole 'suspension of disbelief' thing, no matter what happens. However, there are some instances of Hollywood science that are so stupid they're almost worrying.
The worst case I've seen recently was in G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. - The nanotechnology and the power suits were not a problem at all, but what I couldn't forgive - was the sinking ice.
Anyone else have any examples of really bad Hollywood science?
Most science fiction is completely forgiveable on the basis that "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". And usually most people are perfectly happy to go along with the whole 'suspension of disbelief' thing, no matter what happens. However, there are some instances of Hollywood science that are so stupid they're almost worrying.
The worst case I've seen recently was in G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. - The nanotechnology and the power suits were not a problem at all, but what I couldn't forgive - was the sinking ice.
Anyone else have any examples of really bad Hollywood science?
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
The Disney movie "Black Hole". The good guys go through a black hole, with the help of an angel, and come out safe on the other side. The bad guy goes through the black hole, and winds up in Hell. (Or Indiana, it's not really clear.)
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Dare I say humanoid aliens in almost any film?
Nah. I'll go by something that goes against something we do know.
In the film Apocalypto there's an eclipse and a full moon in the same day/night.

Nah. I'll go by something that goes against something we do know.
In the film Apocalypto there's an eclipse and a full moon in the same day/night.

Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Oh and everyone sliding along to ground to port side when the ship banked in space in Wall-E really annoyed me.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Any and ALL films where people survive in a vacuum by wrapping up warm and holding their breath.




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Apollo 13! They actually tried to make us think we went to the moon! 



Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
I thought breathing out was what you had to do?Feck wrote:Any and ALL films where people survive in a vacuum by wrapping up warm and holding their breath.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Random Mutant
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:34 pm
- Location: Auckland, NZ
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Arthur Dent and Ford Prefect did it and survived, so I don't see what the problem is...?Feck wrote:Any and ALL films where people survive in a vacuum by wrapping up warm and holding their breath.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
-Adam Savage, Mythbuster
-Adam Savage, Mythbuster
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Oh yeah. I hate lasers which fire like bullets. WTF? It should look no different to turning a torch on and off.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
-
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
As far as I understand it, you would violently leek fluids and gases from every available orifice (they certainly never have that in the films) and would be in a lot of pain, but would survive for a little while.Animavore wrote:I thought breathing out was what you had to do?Feck wrote:Any and ALL films where people survive in a vacuum by wrapping up warm and holding their breath.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
-
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
Reminds me of Star Wars when a ship is in free fall towards a planet and tips up, and everyone falls down in the ship, rather than appearing to float.Animavore wrote:Oh and everyone sliding along to ground to port side when the ship banked in space in Wall-E really annoyed me.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
I've heard both, but seen little to support either. (Actual live tests, that is.)Psychoserenity wrote:As far as I understand it, you would violently leek fluids and gases from every available orifice (they certainly never have that in the films) and would be in a lot of pain, but would survive for a little while.Animavore wrote:I thought breathing out was what you had to do?Feck wrote:Any and ALL films where people survive in a vacuum by wrapping up warm and holding their breath.
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
In Back to the Future when the kids start fading out of the photograph one by one. Wouldn't the photograph just disappear altogether?
- colubridae
- Custom Rank: Rank
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
- About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
- Location: Birmingham art gallery
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
The same in aliens, when the marine dropship 'falls' out of the orbiting space-warship.Psychoserenity wrote:Reminds me of Star Wars when a ship is in free fall towards a planet and tips up, and everyone falls down in the ship, rather than appearing to float.Animavore wrote:Oh and everyone sliding along to ground to port side when the ship banked in space in Wall-E really annoyed me.
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Most spectacular piece of scientific revisionism in film
No, because the place where it was taken still existed. They were just getting dealt out of the hand.Arse wrote:In Back to the Future when the kids start fading out of the photograph one by one. Wouldn't the photograph just disappear altogether?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests