I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Give us a seminar, lecture or lesson on what your 'thing' is. Now with our exclusive ASK-A-NERD!!!
User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by hadespussercats » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:04 pm

I've launched a website! I mean, a book! I mean, notebooks! I mean. .. maybe I should back up a bit.

The website in question is http://www.myimaginaryfriend.typepad.com, otherwise known as Richard Dawkins IS kaiser sosay(?) Keyser Soze(!)

Here's some background information:
Back in March, 2009, i began taking notes for a letter to Richard Dawkins, the eminent evolutionary biologist and emeritus professor at Oxford.

He had really managed to piss me off. Which is strange, considering that i admire his work, and i'm an atheist. Stranger still, that i should feel so particularly irritated, considering i've never met the man.

i'd just read two of his books: The God Delusion and A Devil's Chaplain. i began to feel this strange sensation in my head-- wheels spinning and spinning. i felt like i really knew this guy. Since i'm not completely crazy, i realized i didn't. Still, there was this person in my mind, that i could picture so clearly, that hadn't been there before.

At the time, i'd been unemployed for a number of months. i was home, alone for most of the day, with no one to talk to. So i started talking to Imaginary Dawkins. Well, writing, but the writing was decidedly conversational-- various threads of thought explored, abandoned, picked up again later (or not.)

Richard Dawkins became my imaginary friend.

And then one day, i had a thought that seemed to come from nowhere-- why not pretend that Imaginary Dawkins was my personal god? i was already talking with him in much the same way i used to converse with God, back when i believed in him. And my life was unmoored-- i didn't know who i was, what i wanted. So much of my identity had come from the work i did-- without that work, i didn't know who i was. Maybe Imaginary Dawkins could help me.

I decided to try it, as an experiment.

Later, i realized that the idea of a church of Imaginary Dawkins had been proposed by Professor Dennett-- but watching how ideas get kicked around and passed down is one of the themes of this work. If you don't understand why that might be, you need to learn more about the real Richard Dawkins. There are some links on the sidebar you might find helpful towards that end.

This website is my way of publishing the results of my experiment.

The website itself is experimental. i decided i wanted to build it from the bottom up-- so the pages of the notebooks are layered like an excavation-- historical archaeology, if you will. The notebooks proceed in chronological fashion, but i allowed each step of the building process to inform the next. There are illustrations and photos that I happened to have lying around, that were re-appropriated to clarify points (or to make them)-- in the way i picture evolution re-appropriating phenotypic traits for new uses.

While I was working on the notebooks themselves, i began to build shrines to different muses. The shrines, also built out of what happened to be lying around, developed and changed as the project progressed. I documented the changes with my camera, and inserted photos on the website as they seemed subjectively appropriate-- i.e.- shrine development is not depicted in any kind of chronological order.

As for how to navigate the site--

wherever possible, I have annotated links with text-- revealed when you hover the mouse over any link, whether text or image. Links are everywhere. Some serve as footnotes or links back to earlier discussions of similar subject matter, while other links show subjective connections i've made between different ideas.

Sidebar links either explain background information, clarify story-lines within the notebooks, provide examples of my politics or sense of humor, or simply link to other websites i enjoy or find inspirational.

In a way, these links are my layman's attempt to build a model of a neural net. I'd love to keep the experiment alive by inviting my readers to post links of their own-- whether to sites that support or disprove some of my arguments, or to sources of some of the ideas i'm exploring or quoting, or to genealogical connections . ..

For those readers who appreciate an orderly approach, the dead sea scrolls are numbered bottom to top, and are the most straightforward way to take in all the material as quickly as possible.

Or, you can simply follow links as they interest you. After all, there are a lot of different ways to skin a cat.

Meow.
Image
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Trolldor » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:16 pm

...what?
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:09 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:...what?
No idea.
Image

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by hadespussercats » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:12 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:...what?
Yeah, that about sums it up.

If any of you were on the "Doubting Dawkins" thread back at the now sadly defunct RDF forum, and read me getting trounced by The Man for commenting about his (in)famous response to Neil DeGrasse Tyson, the links I posted there were to this project.

So, I guess i"ve gotten his critique already. I'm ready for more, i think.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Rum » Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:18 pm

Some nice images on there like. :tup:

User avatar
charlou
arseist
Posts: 32527
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by charlou » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:00 pm

hadespussercats wrote:I've launched a website! I mean, a book! I mean, notebooks! I mean. .. maybe I should back up a bit.

The website in question is http://www.myimaginaryfriend.typepad.com, otherwise known as Richard Dawkins IS kaiser sosay(?) Keyser Soze(!)

Here's some background information:
Back in March, 2009, i began taking notes for a letter to Richard Dawkins, the eminent evolutionary biologist and emeritus professor at Oxford.

He had really managed to piss me off. Which is strange, considering that i admire his work, and i'm an atheist. Stranger still, that i should feel so particularly irritated, considering i've never met the man.

i'd just read two of his books: The God Delusion and A Devil's Chaplain. i began to feel this strange sensation in my head-- wheels spinning and spinning. i felt like i really knew this guy. Since i'm not completely crazy, i realized i didn't. Still, there was this person in my mind, that i could picture so clearly, that hadn't been there before.

At the time, i'd been unemployed for a number of months. i was home, alone for most of the day, with no one to talk to. So i started talking to Imaginary Dawkins. Well, writing, but the writing was decidedly conversational-- various threads of thought explored, abandoned, picked up again later (or not.)

Richard Dawkins became my imaginary friend.

And then one day, i had a thought that seemed to come from nowhere-- why not pretend that Imaginary Dawkins was my personal god? i was already talking with him in much the same way i used to converse with God, back when i believed in him. And my life was unmoored-- i didn't know who i was, what i wanted. So much of my identity had come from the work i did-- without that work, i didn't know who i was. Maybe Imaginary Dawkins could help me.

I decided to try it, as an experiment.

Later, i realized that the idea of a church of Imaginary Dawkins had been proposed by Professor Dennett-- but watching how ideas get kicked around and passed down is one of the themes of this work. If you don't understand why that might be, you need to learn more about the real Richard Dawkins. There are some links on the sidebar you might find helpful towards that end.

This website is my way of publishing the results of my experiment.

The website itself is experimental. i decided i wanted to build it from the bottom up-- so the pages of the notebooks are layered like an excavation-- historical archaeology, if you will. The notebooks proceed in chronological fashion, but i allowed each step of the building process to inform the next. There are illustrations and photos that I happened to have lying around, that were re-appropriated to clarify points (or to make them)-- in the way i picture evolution re-appropriating phenotypic traits for new uses.

While I was working on the notebooks themselves, i began to build shrines to different muses. The shrines, also built out of what happened to be lying around, developed and changed as the project progressed. I documented the changes with my camera, and inserted photos on the website as they seemed subjectively appropriate-- i.e.- shrine development is not depicted in any kind of chronological order.

As for how to navigate the site--

wherever possible, I have annotated links with text-- revealed when you hover the mouse over any link, whether text or image. Links are everywhere. Some serve as footnotes or links back to earlier discussions of similar subject matter, while other links show subjective connections i've made between different ideas.

Sidebar links either explain background information, clarify story-lines within the notebooks, provide examples of my politics or sense of humor, or simply link to other websites i enjoy or find inspirational.

In a way, these links are my layman's attempt to build a model of a neural net. I'd love to keep the experiment alive by inviting my readers to post links of their own-- whether to sites that support or disprove some of my arguments, or to sources of some of the ideas i'm exploring or quoting, or to genealogical connections . ..

For those readers who appreciate an orderly approach, the dead sea scrolls are numbered bottom to top, and are the most straightforward way to take in all the material as quickly as possible.

Or, you can simply follow links as they interest you. After all, there are a lot of different ways to skin a cat.

Meow.
Image
Faaaaaaaaaaaaaark! The first time I read this I thought wtf?

... Just read it again sans prejudice and ... wow ...
In a way, these links are my layman's attempt to build a model of a neural net.
Delve ...
no fences

User avatar
Horwood Beer-Master
"...a complete Kentish hog"
Posts: 7061
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Wandering somewhere around the Darenth Valley - Kent
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Horwood Beer-Master » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:56 pm

Still no idea. :dono:
Image

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by hadespussercats » Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:26 pm

Rum wrote:Some nice images on there like. :tup:
Thank you!

And for Charlou
Faaaaaaaaaaaaaark! The first time I read this I thought wtf?

... Just read it again sans prejudice and ... wow ...

In a way, these links are my layman's attempt to build a model of a neural net.


Delve ...
I try my best. I know it's confusing-- unfortunately, so's my brain.
Last edited by hadespussercats on Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
AshtonBlack
Tech Monkey
Tech Monkey
Posts: 7773
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by AshtonBlack » Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:28 pm

I'm intrigued and I really like the layout of the blog. It's mad as hell!

Nice work. :tup:

10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:13 am

AshtonBlack wrote:I'm intrigued and I really like the layout of the blog. It's mad as hell!

Nice work. :tup:
Thanks, AshtonBlack-- I'm always looking to intrigue when i can.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Ele
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:40 am
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Ele » Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:48 am

Your blog is a unique work of art. I don't feel I need to understand it. It's full of little surprises and I like looking at it. Nicely done. That white typewriter font on a red background is an especially mind boggling touch and sets of the images really well.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Trolldor » Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:22 am

There's a lot of 'clutter', but the writing makes sense. It's definitely no Chomskybot.
First appearences make it appear a little unorganised, and then there's the whole scrolls thing...
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:29 pm

Your blog is a unique work of art. I don't feel I need to understand it. It's full of little surprises and I like looking at it. Nicely done. That white typewriter font on a red background is an especially mind boggling touch and sets of the images really well.
Thanks, ele. There's a personal reason for the red background-- it's written in there somewhere, if you feel like finding it.
There's a lot of 'clutter', but the writing makes sense. It's definitely no Chomskybot.
First appearences make it appear a little unorganised, and then there's the whole scrolls thing...
What's a Chomskybot? I'm dying to know.
as for the organization (or apparent lack thereof)-- i think that's one of the dangers of not designing whole-cloth ahead of time. I'm glad the writing makes sense, though. Thanks for reading!
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

Trolldor
Gargling with Nails
Posts: 15878
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 am
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by Trolldor » Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:32 pm

http://rubberducky.org/cgi-bin/chomsky.pl

The Chomskybot takes random phrases from Chomsky's work and compiles them together. Every single entry is coded to be gramatically correct, but nobody understands what any of them mean.
It appears that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the descriptive power of the base component does not readily tolerate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual gibberish (eg (98d)). Let us continue to suppose that the earlier discussion of deviance appears to correlate rather closely with a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. From C1, it follows that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not to be considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. It may be, then, that a descriptively adequate grammar is, apparently, determined by the strong generative capacity of the theory.
Next paragraph (Use RELOAD if the button doesn't work)
Also, planning is over-rated.
"The fact is that far more crime and child abuse has been committed by zealots in the name of God, Jesus and Mohammed than has ever been committed in the name of Satan. Many people don't like that statement but few can argue with it."

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: I'm in love with Richard Dawkins! (no, not REALLY)

Post by hadespussercats » Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:10 pm

born-again-atheist wrote:http://rubberducky.org/cgi-bin/chomsky.pl

The Chomskybot takes random phrases from Chomsky's work and compiles them together. Every single entry is coded to be gramatically correct, but nobody understands what any of them mean.
It appears that the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the descriptive power of the base component does not readily tolerate the levels of acceptability from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual gibberish (eg (98d)). Let us continue to suppose that the earlier discussion of deviance appears to correlate rather closely with a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. From C1, it follows that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not to be considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. It may be, then, that a descriptively adequate grammar is, apparently, determined by the strong generative capacity of the theory.
Next paragraph (Use RELOAD if the button doesn't work)
Also, planning is over-rated.

I'm intrigued. is the chomsky-bot recursive?

Also-- planning IS overrated-- best-laid plans oft gang agley and all that.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest