heyzeus wrote:They wouldn't call it genital mutilation because they've been socially conditioned to accept it. I agree that it need to be understood that circumcision is genital mutilation. It's not some harmless medical procedure.
A lot of the men are in very, very deep denial about it. Many of them don't believe that male genital mutilation even leaves a scar. I have actually shown several of my exes the scar
on their own penises. They had no idea that it was a scar until they were told. Most of them seemed to be under the impression that penises just look that way, and had no idea that by removing too much tissue it might actually be their circumcision that makes their penis curve in one direction or the other when they were erect.
It's no different than the women in Africa who have had their labia cut off, and who will do the same to their daughters. They say they weren't mutilated.
Foreskin is a
good thing. Intact guys are, in my extensive personal observation, way more interesting in bed.
'Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man -- living in the sky -- who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do.. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever 'til the end of time! ..But He loves you.' - George Carlin