Sex on the new forum

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:37 am

Breasts are very, very good. :nono:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
sifaka
Posts: 487
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:15 am
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by sifaka » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:37 am

Bella Fortuna wrote:Hey hey hey, you guys... this is about sex on the forum, not violence on the forum. I expect some sex forthwith. :coffee:
It's so hard to tell where one stops and the other begins, between Virphen and me... :?

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:44 am

Bella Fortuna wrote:Breasts are very, very good. :nono:
I like breasts, and thighs.


(We are talking about chicken, aren't we?)
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
sifaka
Posts: 487
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:15 am
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by sifaka » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:47 am

Gawdzilla wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:Breasts are very, very good. :nono:
I like breasts, and thighs.


(We are talking about chicken, aren't we?)
You can talk about chicken, we'll keep talking about chicks :biggrin:

User avatar
Millie
Double-D Atheist
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:39 am
Location: Shacked up with a Double Bass Atheist in NJ, USA
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Millie » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:49 am

Gawdzilla wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:Breasts are very, very good. :nono:
I like breasts, and thighs.


(We are talking about chicken, aren't we?)
As long as we're not talkin' turkey. We've seen what Bella does with turkey. :o

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:51 am

Millie wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:Breasts are very, very good. :nono:
I like breasts, and thighs.


(We are talking about chicken, aren't we?)
As long as we're not talkin' turkey. We've seen what Bella does with turkey. :o
Hey, get a couple of thighs together and you've got yourself a very nice snack. :naughty:
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Millie
Double-D Atheist
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:39 am
Location: Shacked up with a Double Bass Atheist in NJ, USA
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Millie » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:52 am

Gawdzilla wrote: Hey, get a couple of thighs together and you've got yourself a very nice snack. :naughty:
I always thought keeping the thighs apart was much more... yummy.
:naughty:

User avatar
virphen
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:37 am
About me: "that fairy-fingering ass-raping space lizard"

One year own my home planet = 3 on earth.
Location: Orbit.

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by virphen » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:53 am

Is your avatar supposed to be proof Jesus' mother had implants, zilla?

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Hermit » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:59 am

sifaka wrote:Getting back on topic :D

There's a thread on RS called "Why are breasts bad?", they already got a "Mode note" :hehe:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/socio ... t1919.html
RichardPrins wrote:*** MOD NOTE ***
Some post were binned because they were in breach of the user agreement or off-topic.

Please stay on topic (see the OP), and keep in mind what the User Agreement says about Sex and Nudity.
As I said earlier elsewhere, the only difference between the RDF and the RSF is that at the RDF Mark II there is no knighthood at stake. :levi:
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:03 am

virphen wrote:Is your avatar supposed to be proof Jesus' mother had implants, zilla?
Wouldn't that be the correct terminology for the immaculate conception?
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74098
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by JimC » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:06 am

Seraph wrote:
sifaka wrote:Getting back on topic :D

There's a thread on RS called "Why are breasts bad?", they already got a "Mode note" :hehe:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/socio ... t1919.html
RichardPrins wrote:*** MOD NOTE ***
Some post were binned because they were in breach of the user agreement or off-topic.

Please stay on topic (see the OP), and keep in mind what the User Agreement says about Sex and Nudity.
As I said earlier elsewhere, the only difference between the RDF and the RSF is that at the RDF Mark II there is no knighthood at stake. :levi:
Shit, I didn't realise the Prinsmeister was on staff there! :?

Great source of science info, the old RPrins, but a prude to the core... :nono:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
virphen
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:37 am
About me: "that fairy-fingering ass-raping space lizard"

One year own my home planet = 3 on earth.
Location: Orbit.

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by virphen » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:07 am

Bella Fortuna wrote:
virphen wrote:Is your avatar supposed to be proof Jesus' mother had implants, zilla?
Wouldn't that be the correct terminology for the immaculate conception?
Maybe, if you were referring to Jesus' grandmother...

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74098
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by JimC » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:09 am

virphen wrote:
Bella Fortuna wrote:
virphen wrote:Is your avatar supposed to be proof Jesus' mother had implants, zilla?
Wouldn't that be the correct terminology for the immaculate conception?
Maybe, if you were referring to Jesus' grandmother...
On his mum's side or his dad's? :dono:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by Bella Fortuna » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:15 am

Seraph wrote:
sifaka wrote:Getting back on topic :D

There's a thread on RS called "Why are breasts bad?", they already got a "Mode note" :hehe:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/socio ... t1919.html
RichardPrins wrote:*** MOD NOTE ***
Some post were binned because they were in breach of the user agreement or off-topic.

Please stay on topic (see the OP), and keep in mind what the User Agreement says about Sex and Nudity.
As I said earlier elsewhere, the only difference between the RDF and the RSF is that at the RDF Mark II there is no knighthood at stake. :levi:
The next post after Prins' mod note talks about our culture needing to de-prude, in response to a previous post. Sorry, but the irony made me :coffeespray: :nono:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
starr
Account Suspended at Member's Request
Posts: 3060
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Sex on the new forum

Post by starr » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:21 am

JimC wrote:
Seraph wrote:
sifaka wrote:Getting back on topic :D

There's a thread on RS called "Why are breasts bad?", they already got a "Mode note" :hehe:
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/socio ... t1919.html
RichardPrins wrote:*** MOD NOTE ***
Some post were binned because they were in breach of the user agreement or off-topic.

Please stay on topic (see the OP), and keep in mind what the User Agreement says about Sex and Nudity.
As I said earlier elsewhere, the only difference between the RDF and the RSF is that at the RDF Mark II there is no knighthood at stake. :levi:
Shit, I didn't realise the Prinsmeister was on staff there! :?

Great source of science info, the old RPrins, but a prude to the core... :nono:
:roll:

I realise that a lot of the Oct 08 schism-affected individuals did not like the post-schism RDF. There were a lot of RDF members who did like the post-schism RDF (me included). Please understand that when you say RSK is just RDF Mark II, I actually take that as a compliment. :levi:
Always in the mood for a little bit of nonsense...
rationalskepticism.org

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests