response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks

[Conny]

a long but worth while analysis: The Truth About 9/11
by Elizabeth Woodworth
in Countercurrents.org http://countercurrents.org/woodworth250210.htm25 February, 2010

Abstract

In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account.

Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a "conspiracy theory" ignoring science and common sense.

This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies.

Eight countries – Britain , Canada , Denmark , France , the Netherlands , New Zealand , Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11.

This more open approach taken in the international media – I could also have included the Japanese media – might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks – a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re-examine the country's foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge.

[owtth]

OooooKaayyy

Could have sworn I saw at least one plane flying into a tower.

[Rum]

What a load of cods wallop. (and I wasted 10 minutes of my life reading this garbage).

[rachelbean]

Independent science?

[Clinton Huxley]

Independent science?

Independent of reality, I expect.

[Wumbologist]

OooooKaayyy

Could have sworn I saw at least one plane flying into a tower.

Of course you SAW them, everyone SAW them... but they weren't really there. Or at least, they weren't really PLANES. They were actually super-advanced holograms programmed to coincide with the first round of explosives the Reptilian Overlords used for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

[Clinton Huxley]

OooooKaayyy

Could have sworn I saw at least one plane flying into a tower.

Of course you SAW them, everyone SAW them... but they weren't really there. Or at least, they weren't really PLANES. They were actually super-advanced holograms programmed to coincide with the first round of explosives the Reptilian Overlords used for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

You fell for that? The Towers were never destroyed, they're still there.......

[Rum]

OooooKaayyy

Could have sworn I saw at least one plane flying into a tower.

Of course you SAW them, everyone SAW them... but they weren't really there. Or at least, they weren't really PLANES. They were actually super-advanced holograms programmed to coincide with the first round of explosives the Reptilian Overlords used for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

You fell for that? The Towers were never destroyed, they're still there.......

No no no! In actual fact they were never there in the FIRST place!

[Clinton Huxley]

OooooKaayyy

Could have sworn I saw at least one plane flying into a tower.

Of course you SAW them, everyone SAW them... but they weren't really there. Or at least, they weren't really PLANES. They were actually super-advanced holograms programmed to coincide with the first round of explosives the Reptilian Overlords used for the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

You fell for that? The Towers were never destroyed, they're still there.......

No no no! In actual fact they were never there in the FIRST place!

Good Lord! I bet our Reptilian Overlords aren't even Reptiles! Could they be.....Amphibian UnderLords?!?

[Heresiarch]

Independent science?

Independent of reality, I expect.

From the people who brought you Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design.

Oh, this thread also needs:

[Rum]

Why do you think the towers were 'twin' in the first place? The 'Duality' at work if you needed even more proof than the piles there already is out there!

http://www.dualitythreat.org.uk

[Martok]

The Klingons did it.

[Wumbologist]

The Klingons did it.

Nope. An exiled Cardassian did it, and made it LOOK like Al-Qaeda did it, so that the Romulans would invade Iraq.

Wait, what?

[Randydeluxe]

Just fixing up the OP here...

a long but worth while analysis: The Truth Ridiculous Things A Few People Want To Believe About 9/11
by Elizabeth Woodworth
in Countercurrents.org http://countercurrents.org/woodworth250210.htm25 February, 2010

[Virus]

There are two topics I consider too stupid to discuss;

1. Creationism
2. 9/11 conspiracies.