Hmmm..... you also have a dash ofFBM wrote:HughMcB wrote:Thats better... :pissed:FBM wrote:Bugger off!
How's that? hee hee...![]()
Actually, my personality is more like something between aand a
with a dash of
.



Hmmm..... you also have a dash ofFBM wrote:HughMcB wrote:Thats better... :pissed:FBM wrote:Bugger off!
How's that? hee hee...![]()
Actually, my personality is more like something between aand a
with a dash of
.
How dare you suggest such! Oh! I'm going to be faint...starr wrote:Hmmm..... you also have a dash ofif I recall.
![]()
i completely agree, and I don't think I have said much of anything that can contribute to Richard's next quote mining expedition if he chooses to embark on one.heyjude wrote:I completely understand your thoughts, but just one little thing. We are guests (invited yes) in this nice place and I think we have made quite a few people a little uncomfy. I'd hate to think we alienate people from their own forum while we vent our own frustrations (which are justified)... but we should be kind towards our gracious hosts and try to keep a little rational about this.
Besides, if we can be more clear headed than Richard has recently been, and approach this with rational well thought out posts, then we show ourselves for the intelligent wonderful people we are. Their loss
I'll raise my glass of neat gin, and toast that!HughMcB wrote:Yeah, we're all n00bs again...kiore wrote:Personally I am starting to feel that I am nolonger a refugee here, but just a nOObie ex lurker.![]()
Lets CHEESE!
Hack, can I suggest you talk to Simon Gardner about this? I think he might have some ideas...hackenslash wrote: Enough venting has been done, and we should now begin to focus on what we do next, and how we go about it.
Tony
I wanted to start a forum anyways, didn't really expect this to happen thoughHughMcB wrote:Hack, whats our best option here? Starting our own forum?
Does anyone have any ideas?
Well it’s not complex. But also may or may not be achievable. My view for some days has been that we need to start looking for some source of alternative funding (I’m thinking rich atheist benefactor) and just start the whole thing up again as soon as funds permit.Nora_Leonard wrote:Hack, can I suggest you talk to Simon Gardner about this? I think he might have some ideas...hackenslash wrote: Enough venting has been done, and we should now begin to focus on what we do next, and how we go about it.
Tony
You bet... and besides... who knows if HE actually did it in the first place. Maybe it was found and presented to him? Who knows.... If he had looked properly he would have seen more than just insults. But then... perhaps once you're in a certain frame of mind all you see is the bad stuff. I'd like to think a person of science is able to be more objective though.95Theses wrote:
i completely agree, and I don't think I have said much of anything that can contribute to Richard's next quote mining expedition if he chooses to embark on one.
Bravo95Theses wrote:I've already donated to the upkeep of the servers here inorder that I don't feel that I'm completely taking the piss, my comment was more a general one with reference to other blogs and forums I've been trying to disseminate the true facts at.
We and more importantly the mods have been done a huge disservice, first by Josh and Andrew, and now more significantly by Richard Dawkins himself on the front page of the forums that were so useful, informative and vibrant for so long.
I for one, refuse to go quietly into the night, but I will do anything and everything to ensure the least disruption possible for the members here whose house was so graciously offered in our time of need, and which we need to be careful not to take over as if we own the place.
My sentiments EXACTLY!95Theses wrote:Hack
Whilst I agree we should tone down the invective some, I do note that Richard continues to keep his own quote mine laden emotional outburst at the top of his own forums, and to that end I'm certainly not going to shut up about all this.
The irony is that his own forums taught me to realise how pathetic his argument is. Had someone come to the forums and tried to present an argument like that against RD they would have been roasted over the fires of facts and reason. It's telling that it has to be locked to prevent any members replying with the actual truth. Smells like something banaman or Ken Ham would do, not the good Professor.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests