First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Elessarina
Bearer of Anduril
Bearer of Anduril
Posts: 9517
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
Location: Rivendell
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Elessarina » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:54 pm

Mazille wrote:
Elessarina wrote:
Mazille wrote:
(Also, it looks like he actually read some posts here.)

What are you basing that on?
He quoted some statements about Josh that were made here word for word.
Do you have links?

User avatar
natselrox
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:32 am
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by natselrox » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:55 pm

Where do they think the money to run their Rational Foundation comes from? :Erasb:

Mazille
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:53 pm

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Mazille » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:56 pm

Elessarina wrote:
Mazille wrote:
Elessarina wrote:
Mazille wrote:
(Also, it looks like he actually read some posts here.)

What are you basing that on?
He quoted some statements about Josh that were made here word for word.
Do you have links?
Give me a few minutes... (Since the search facility hear is actually working, I should be able to find them. :biggrin: )

Pensioner
Grumpy old fart.
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Pensioner » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:56 pm

Elessarina wrote:
Mazille wrote:
(Also, it looks like he actually read some posts here.)

What are you basing that on?[/quote]

Your kidding me, who do you think read the posts.
“I wish no harm to any human being, but I, as one man, am going to exercise my freedom of speech. No human being on the face of the earth, no government is going to take from me my right to speak, my right to protest against wrong, my right to do everything that is for the benefit of mankind. I am not here, then, as the accused; I am here as the accuser of capitalism dripping with blood from head to foot.”

John Maclean (Scottish socialist) speech from the Dock 1918.

User avatar
hotshoe
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:06 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by hotshoe » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:57 pm

"slack jawed turd in the mouth mug"

http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... ug#p352318

User avatar
Feck
.
.
Posts: 28391
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Feck » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:58 pm

I'm not anonymous RD you have my name. I've posted Google street view of my house with links so if you look you know my address my mobile number is

07956 855234 And I stand by my comment that Timmy Fucked the mods and the admin of the forum without even kissing them first !
:hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog: :hoverdog:
Give me the wine , I don't need the bread

User avatar
fredbear
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:08 am
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by fredbear » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:58 pm

well i never thought i'd feel like a petulant teenager before a bullying games teacher again.

you are quite right bella he is deflecting the real issues by making himself the victim. yes those are abusive, knee jerk and in some cases ignorant insults and they don't help. but to use them to kick and berate a whole community legitimately concerned by the unreasonable behaviour of 3 people is cheap.

skintbuthappy has posted an article written last year by rd in "the edge" which predicts this rd's post.

Mazille
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:53 pm

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Mazille » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:00 pm

Pensioner wrote:
Elessarina wrote:
Mazille wrote:
(Also, it looks like he actually read some posts here.)

What are you basing that on?
Your kidding me, who do you think read the posts.
I don't know who and I am not kidding.

LakLak posted this
laklak wrote:
ED209 wrote: Now let's get back to calling this Josh a suppurating rectum :mob: ....
Ok. Josh is a suppurating rectum. A suppurating rat's rectum. A suppurating rat's rectum inside a dead skunk that's been shoved up a week-old dead rhino's twat.

I feel better now.

here: http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... um#p349715

And now look again what Richard quoted:
Richard Dawkins wrote:Imagine that you, as a greatly liked and respected person, found yourself overnight subjected to personal vilification on an unprecedented scale, from anonymous commenters on a website. Suppose you found yourself described as an “utter twat” a “suppurating rectum. A suppurating rat’s rectum. A suppurating rat’s rectum inside a dead skunk that’s been shoved up a week-old dead rhino’s twat.”

User avatar
Elessarina
Bearer of Anduril
Bearer of Anduril
Posts: 9517
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:12 pm
About me: The Fastest Ratz.. apparently
Location: Rivendell
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Elessarina » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:00 pm

I found the rat's rectum one in the Twat thread.. :s

Hmm well I suppose someone here perhaps told Josh or RD.. or maybe they did visit..

Either way I am not quite sure myself what all the crazy outrage is about.. :duck:

User avatar
Strontium Dog
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:28 am
About me: Navy Seals are not seals
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by Strontium Dog » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:01 pm

And this guy is supposed to be the most rational person on the planet?

If so, humanity is well and truly FUCKED.
100% verifiable facts or your money back. Anti-fascist. Enemy of woo - theistic or otherwise. Cloth is not an antiviral. Imagination and fantasy is no substitute for tangible reality. Wishing doesn't make it real.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Barry Goldwater

User avatar
paceetrate
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:33 am
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by paceetrate » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:01 pm

I'm wondering if Josh pointed him to the most ridiculous posts and brushed the legitimate ones under the rug...

User avatar
95Theses
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by 95Theses » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm

paceetrate wrote:I'm wondering if Josh pointed him to the most ridiculous posts and brushed the legitimate ones under the rug...
No I imagine what josh did was run round here collecting the worst he could find, then presented them to RD as the combined comments of the entire previous user base.
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell.

User avatar
hotshoe
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:06 pm
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by hotshoe » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:03 pm

So RD's whole pile of hostile quotes comes from here, from Rationalia.

Well, they couldn't very well have come from RDnet, because the critical posts there were killed.

User avatar
paceetrate
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:33 am
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by paceetrate » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:04 pm

95Theses wrote:
paceetrate wrote:I'm wondering if Josh pointed him to the most ridiculous posts and brushed the legitimate ones under the rug...
No I imagine what josh did was run round here collecting the worst he could find, then presented them to RD as the combined comments of the entire previous user base.
That's basically what I meant.

User avatar
cowiz
Shirley
Posts: 16482
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:56 pm
About me: Head up a camels arse
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: First reaction by Richard Dawkins.

Post by cowiz » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:04 pm

May I just point out that Josh is a turd eating bucket of pissing vomit?

I hope that gets a mention.
It's a piece of piss to be cowiz, but it's not cowiz to be a piece of piss. Or something like that.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests