Oh shit!Agrippina wrote:Serve 'em right if the new thingy doesn't take off and all 85,000 come over here.


We are only a small village!
A few hundred, fine, but otherwise...

Oh shit!Agrippina wrote:Serve 'em right if the new thingy doesn't take off and all 85,000 come over here.
Flora wrote:I've just deleted all my posts and made registered user as my default (so I'm not red) but I can't take myself out of the admin group so I've requested that. I'm just letting people know in case they think someone else deleted my posts. (The last one won't go because you can't be a lurker and an admin I guess!).
If this bull was the case, then why not just remove all of the moderators privileges and reopen the forum for 30 days. Then everyone would be given a fair shot at expressing their views and everyone would be allowed to communicate a relocation rather than the "lucky" few that happened to be on during the 2 hours of it happening. If we are welcome for us proles to move to a separate forum why make it so chuffing difficult.Josh wrote:We were not telling the regular users what they could and couldn't do, they were all welcome to move to a separate forum. This public posting of personal communication, along with several inappropriate posts made by our very own moderators, convinced the foundation to close the forum down and make it read-only.
Never mind the fact that they made every attempt to stop people finding out about alternative forums.SnowLeopard wrote:If this bull was the case, then why not just remove all of the moderators privileges and reopen the forum for 30 days. Then everyone would be given a fair shot at expressing their views and everyone would be allowed to communicate a relocation rather than the "lucky" few that happened to be on during the 2 hours of it happening. If we are welcome for us proles to move to a separate forum why make it so chuffing difficult.Josh wrote:We were not telling the regular users what they could and couldn't do, they were all welcome to move to a separate forum. This public posting of personal communication, along with several inappropriate posts made by our very own moderators, convinced the foundation to close the forum down and make it read-only.
Because without us lackies to protect them from all of you, they're fucked. That's why they shut down the forum.SnowLeopard wrote:If this bull was the case, then why not just remove all of the moderators privileges and reopen the forum for 30 days. Then everyone would be given a fair shot at expressing their views and everyone would be allowed to communicate a relocation rather than the "lucky" few that happened to be on during the 2 hours of it happening. If we are welcome for us proles to move to a separate forum why make it so chuffing difficult.Josh wrote:We were not telling the regular users what they could and couldn't do, they were all welcome to move to a separate forum. This public posting of personal communication, along with several inappropriate posts made by our very own moderators, convinced the foundation to close the forum down and make it read-only.
I noticed that too. And it was signed "RDF" as well, not "Josh-off and Androol".Ilovelucy wrote:I have noticed one thing though, no mention of Richard in the latest announcement. All the references are to the foundation.
Probably because it's the Foundation that owns the website and employs JT.Ilovelucy wrote:I have noticed one thing though, no mention of Richard in the latest announcement. All the references are to the foundation.
Rather like the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society.SnowLeopard wrote:Just ends up making it sound like the Mafia.
"Sincerely, from the corporation."
When in trouble, don't give them a personal target to aim at. The bigger and more nebulous the target, the better.z8000783 wrote:Probably because it's the Foundation that owns the website and employs JT.Ilovelucy wrote:I have noticed one thing though, no mention of Richard in the latest announcement. All the references are to the foundation.
John
Indeed, and it looks like some of his posts have been deleted too. It says he's made 436 posts... unless I'm remembering incorrectly, the last time I saw his profile it said 440 something. So looks like he's getting the short end of the stick, too.ozewiezeloose wrote:My message to RD has now been read. No reply, obviously.
RD's on-line now.
Well give the guy a chance I imagine he has more than he wants on his plate at the moment. He is very unlikely to reply individually, he is much more likely to make a general statement via a post on the forum.ozewiezeloose wrote:My message to RD has now been read. No reply, obviously.
RD's on-line now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests