Dr Who

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:16 am

Why didn't we have a Dr Who thread? Or have I missed it?

Well April 3rd brings the first outing of the 11th Doctor, the youngest ever actor to play the part.

Best to date? IMO Patrick Troughton. Scared the living daylights out of me from 6 to 9 years old!!

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by klr » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:17 am

CJ wrote:Why didn't we have a Dr Who thread? Or have I missed it?

Well April 3rd brings the first outing of the 11th Doctor, the youngest ever actor to play the part.

Best to date? IMO Patrick Troughton. Scared the living daylights out of me from 6 to 9 years old!!
There have been discussions on this elsewhere IIRC, but no full-blown thread to date. Just search for David Tennant or Tom Baker ... :read:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:24 am

klr wrote:
CJ wrote:Why didn't we have a Dr Who thread? Or have I missed it?

Well April 3rd brings the first outing of the 11th Doctor, the youngest ever actor to play the part.

Best to date? IMO Patrick Troughton. Scared the living daylights out of me from 6 to 9 years old!!
There have been discussions on this elsewhere IIRC, but no full-blown thread to date. Just search for David Tennant or Tom Baker ... :read:
Could do but this thread can be for the latest Dr !!

User avatar
War Arrow
Traitorous TAF Fifth Columnist
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:43 pm
About me: gettin' ig'nant
Location: parked car outside your house with a dozen pork pies and a crate of brown ale
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by War Arrow » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:35 pm

CJ wrote:Why didn't we have a Dr Who thread? Or have I missed it?

Well April 3rd brings the first outing of the 11th Doctor, the youngest ever actor to play the part.

Best to date? IMO Patrick Troughton. Scared the living daylights out of me from 6 to 9 years old!!
Good man! Hartnell's actually my favourite but you'd still have to go a long way to beat the Troughton. I've been a bit luke warm about the revival to be honest - the writing is embarrassing at times, and they cover it up with edits, effects, and queasily manipulative cheap tugging of heart strings - though the exceptions have been great and I like David Tennant a lot.

The new guy - I dunno... every time I see him I just get a visual of Tommy Cooper.

Image

Man walked into a bar.
Ouuufff!!!
It was an iron bar.

Spoon jar spoon spoon jar spoon jar jar spoon!
Image

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:43 pm

It'll be an interesting series for sure. While the Russell T Davies has definitely revitalised the franchise, effects are no longer cringworthy, there is something not quite right with the flavour and I think it the centring on the relationship of the Dr with his assistant who is, after all, only a plot device so the Dr doesn't end up talking to himself all the time! Now Russell T Davies is out of the picture it'll be interesting who the stories, character and direction goes. I hope story lines start to take on a more prominent roll.

I must say though that I do think the Darleks with their rotating gun are a much more effective foe that the rubber sucker mod of the 60s.

User avatar
War Arrow
Traitorous TAF Fifth Columnist
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:43 pm
About me: gettin' ig'nant
Location: parked car outside your house with a dozen pork pies and a crate of brown ale
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by War Arrow » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:01 pm

Oh yes - there's definitely a lot of improvements. I suppose my main problems are he's just too touchy-feely. The last time he got emotional over a companion was Jon Pertwee quietly sneaking away from Jo Grant's wedding with a single tear in his eye - all over in about five seconds and ten times more powerful than all the boo hooing over Billy Piper - I mean BILLY PIPER ffs!!! I think also the need to turn each one into an explosion filled action adventure suffocates some of the more subtle menace the show used to do so well. Not always, I mean The Family of Blood was great (though that was originally a pretty fat novel) but er.... I mean for example The Daemons was made in 1970 at the height of rubber monster ropiness and unconvincing chroma-key and yet the pacing and the sheer sense of sub-Hammer Horror menace still scares the crap out of me for all its faults. I think the main problem for me though is just the music. It just drowns everything. If the writing's there, you shouldn't need an orchestra telling you how to feel. At full volume. Every single second.

Mmmmmmm.... that show was my life when I was a kid which is probably why I'm now such a moaning git on this subject. :oops:
Image

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by Bella Fortuna » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:19 pm

I've heard of Dr. Who my whole life, yet am just getting into it - currently in the middle of watching the Tom Baker 'Stones of Blood' series with my son, and we are loving it. He can't wait to watch them. :woot:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Clinton Huxley
19th century monkeybitch.
Posts: 23739
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by Clinton Huxley » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:27 pm

There's nothing wrong with Dr Who that pitting the time-travelling fop against some intelligent moss or something won't rectify.
I agree that there are WAY too many explosions, ropy plots and too much blubbing. Need to get off EArth som more, too.

And more UNIT!

"Eyes front, pop that chap, somebody"
"I grow old … I grow old …
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled"

AND MERRY XMAS TO ONE AND All!

Imagehttp://25kv.co.uk/date_counter.php?date ... 20counting!!![/img-sig]

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:42 pm

Well I did like the Billy Piper romance bit but the trouble was that the nature of the programme meant it could never go anywhere except disaster really. It's a dead end plot line, however if it got a new generation on board the great. RTD is a bit of a drama 'queen' at the best of times and I quite like Cpt Jack as a character but if that ever make the Dr a woman I will remove all televisions form my house and stop paying the licence fee!

User avatar
ficklefiend
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by ficklefiend » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:52 pm

Yay! Who thread! I will make a proper post here soon, but for now - yay!
Set phasers tae malky!
www.ficklefiend.deviantart.com

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:55 pm

ficklefiend wrote:Yay! Who thread! I will make a proper post here soon, but for now - yay!
:mrgreen:

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:56 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:There's nothing wrong with Dr Who that pitting the time-travelling fop against some intelligent moss or something won't rectify.
I agree that there are WAY too many explosions, ropy plots and too much blubbing. Need to get off EArth som more, too.

And more UNIT!

"Eyes front, pop that chap, somebody"
Yes more of Earth stuff would be good. Explosions on other planets!

User avatar
Faithfree
The Potable Atheist
Posts: 16173
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:58 am
About me: All things in moderation, including moderation
Location: Planet of the grapes
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by Faithfree » Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:06 pm

The various Doctors seem, on average, to be getting younger with time. If the current trend continues, by the 15th Doctor we'll have a foetus in a trench coat. And there must be a female Doctor coming up soon; don't recall anything in the regeneration rules that forbid it (are there any regeneration rules?).
Although it may look like a forum, this site is actually a crowd-sourced science project modelling the slow but inexorable heat death of the universe.

CJ
Posts: 8436
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:03 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK

Re: Dr Who

Post by CJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:17 pm

Faithfree wrote:The various Doctors seem, on average, to be getting younger with time. If the current trend continues, by the 15th Doctor we'll have a foetus in a trench coat. And there must be a female Doctor coming up soon; don't recall anything in the regeneration rules that forbid it (are there any regeneration rules?).
My wife keeps telling me they'll be a female Dr at some point just before we see Daleks wearing pink frilly knickers :roll:

User avatar
War Arrow
Traitorous TAF Fifth Columnist
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:43 pm
About me: gettin' ig'nant
Location: parked car outside your house with a dozen pork pies and a crate of brown ale
Contact:

Re: Dr Who

Post by War Arrow » Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:59 pm

Clinton Huxley wrote:There's nothing wrong with Dr Who that pitting the time-travelling fop against some intelligent moss or something won't rectify.
I agree that there are WAY too many explosions, ropy plots and too much blubbing. Need to get off EArth som more, too.

And more UNIT!

"Eyes front, pop that chap, somebody"
"Sergeant Benton, chap with wings - five rounds rapid..."
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests