Why is it that . . .
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Why is it that . . .
. . . only the dinosaurs with beaks survived the mass extinction?
Re: Why is it that . . .
They could peck the fuck out of asteroids?Gawdzilla wrote:. . . only the dinosaurs with beaks survived the mass extinction?

- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Why is it that . . .
Best answer so far.Devogue wrote:They could peck the fuck out of asteroids?Gawdzilla wrote:. . . only the dinosaurs with beaks survived the mass extinction?
Re: Why is it that . . .
Not correct. Triceratops had beaks and thy were fucked.
The ones that would later become birds did not have beaks at time of mass extinction.
The ones that would later become birds did not have beaks at time of mass extinction.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Why is it that . . .
I didn't say all beaked dinosaurs survived.Animavore wrote:Not correct. Triceratops had beaks and thy were fucked.
Which ones, please? I'm trying to sort this out.The ones that would later become birds did not have beaks at time of mass extinction.
Re: Why is it that . . .
Meh. It means getting up out of bed and grabbing a book off the bookshelf. I''l be back in 2 minutes.Gawdzilla wrote:I didn't say all beaked dinosaurs survived.Animavore wrote:Not correct. Triceratops had beaks and thy were fucked.Which ones, please? I'm trying to sort this out.The ones that would later become birds did not have beaks at time of mass extinction.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
Re: Why is it that . . .




Give me the wine , I don't need the bread
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Why is it that . . .
Excellent starting point!

Re: Why is it that . . .
The book I have just describes the fossil record and gives no insight into why they survived. This book is more about the tree of life and shows the intermediaries between ancient and modern types. Quite detailed it is too but it doesn't stray out of palaeontology. It stays on topic throughout.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Why is it that . . .
Feck's article gives an opinion on the dinos, but I'm still looking to see if the "rule" applies across the board for the K-T event. If relative brain size is the key for the dinos would it apply to other types of animals? If not, does it really apply to dinos?Animavore wrote:The book I have just describes the fossil record and gives no insight into why they survived. This book is more about the tree of life and shows the intermediaries between ancient and modern types. Quite detailed it is too but it doesn't stray out of palaeontology. It stays on topic throughout.
Sorry.
Re: Why is it that . . .
It could be size and warm bloodedness either. I did once read speculation that mammals because they were small and could sustain themselves on grubs and insects and such through the darkness following the aftermath and cold.Gawdzilla wrote:Feck's article gives an opinion on the dinos, but I'm still looking to see if the "rule" applies across the board for the K-T event. If relative brain size is the key for the dinos would it apply to other types of animals? If not, does it really apply to dinos?Animavore wrote:The book I have just describes the fossil record and gives no insight into why they survived. This book is more about the tree of life and shows the intermediaries between ancient and modern types. Quite detailed it is too but it doesn't stray out of palaeontology. It stays on topic throughout.
Sorry.
The dinosaurs that became birds already had feathers which could have insulated them and I know some of them were quite small like chickens. They may even have had warm blood already at this stage. Fossils can never tell us things like that.
Ok the part about the avian dinosaurs is totally me speculating but if they can do it so can I.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Why is it that . . .
Alligators and turtles survived. Coelocanth (sp?) survived. Warm-blood would have helped, but it's not the only type to survive. (Just rambling here, thinking out loud.)Animavore wrote:It could be size and warm bloodedness either. I did once read speculation that mammals because they were small and could sustain themselves on grubs and insects and such through the darkness following the aftermath and cold.Gawdzilla wrote:Feck's article gives an opinion on the dinos, but I'm still looking to see if the "rule" applies across the board for the K-T event. If relative brain size is the key for the dinos would it apply to other types of animals? If not, does it really apply to dinos?Animavore wrote:The book I have just describes the fossil record and gives no insight into why they survived. This book is more about the tree of life and shows the intermediaries between ancient and modern types. Quite detailed it is too but it doesn't stray out of palaeontology. It stays on topic throughout.
Sorry.
The dinosaurs that became birds already had feathers which could have insulated them and I know some of them were quite small like chickens. They may even have had warm blood already at this stage. Fossils can never tell us things like that.
Ok the part about the avian dinosaurs is totally me speculating but if they can do it so can I.
Re: Why is it that . . .
Turtles live in the sea it may have been warmer there. Not sure about alligators unless they moved into deltas.Gawdzilla wrote:Alligators and turtles survived. Coelocanth (sp?) survived. Warm-blood would have helped, but it's not the only type to survive. (Just rambling here, thinking out loud.)Animavore wrote:It could be size and warm bloodedness either. I did once read speculation that mammals because they were small and could sustain themselves on grubs and insects and such through the darkness following the aftermath and cold.Gawdzilla wrote:Feck's article gives an opinion on the dinos, but I'm still looking to see if the "rule" applies across the board for the K-T event. If relative brain size is the key for the dinos would it apply to other types of animals? If not, does it really apply to dinos?Animavore wrote:The book I have just describes the fossil record and gives no insight into why they survived. This book is more about the tree of life and shows the intermediaries between ancient and modern types. Quite detailed it is too but it doesn't stray out of palaeontology. It stays on topic throughout.
Sorry.
The dinosaurs that became birds already had feathers which could have insulated them and I know some of them were quite small like chickens. They may even have had warm blood already at this stage. Fossils can never tell us things like that.
Ok the part about the avian dinosaurs is totally me speculating but if they can do it so can I.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Why is it that . . .
Sea life would have an advantage in the K-T event, I think. The big gators only need to feed once a year, so they could have taken the odd survivor and maintained on that while the mess was sorting itself out.Animavore wrote:Turtles live in the sea it may have been warmer there. Not sure about alligators unless they moved into deltas.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests