

I think that article is a troll for a distributor.Pluto2 wrote:![]()
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."
That's what I said.AshtonBlack wrote:"Religious" was more controvercial. Call me an old cynic, but this will get a distributor, after it's built up a bit of hype. (and therefore profit.)
This Merka, they kill you for not being a good Christian here.Brian Peacock wrote:A good old fashioned religious uproar might spark wider discussion about Darwin and Darwinism - the lies about which can only be supported by ignorance...
This Merka?Gawdzilla wrote:This Merka, they kill you for not being a good Christian here.Brian Peacock wrote:A good old fashioned religious uproar might spark wider discussion about Darwin and Darwinism - the lies about which can only be supported by ignorance...
I'm uh Merkin, you dang fuel!Brian Peacock wrote:This Merka?Gawdzilla wrote:This Merka, they kill you for not being a good Christian here.Brian Peacock wrote:A good old fashioned religious uproar might spark wider discussion about Darwin and Darwinism - the lies about which can only be supported by ignorance...
I think they mean it's Darwin's Creation, which is the only creation worth talking about.aznxscorpion517 wrote:I find the title a horrible choice. Seems like they wanted to friendly it up for the religious but I'm fairly sure it's just futile.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests