Carbon emission reduction: News and technology

[Brian Peacock]

Declarative flat out wrong gets dissed....nothing new there.

Indeed.

You missed the question mark though, didn't you?

[macdoc]

I did not...

the question mark was related to this

wait, what's the good of upcycling old solar panels

this is a statement

whose efficiency at power generation is very low, if still useful at all

Do you have trouble parsing Brian?.

[Brian Peacock]

I did not...

the question mark was related to this

wait, what's the good of upcycling old solar panels

this is a statement

whose efficiency at power generation is very low, if still useful at all

Do you have trouble parsing Brian?.

Now now. You've deliberately knocked the question mark off there. Why would you do that? Perhaps it's so you can double-down on pretending that Svarty's posts wasn't interrogative - therefore 'proving' you correct in being a bit of a grumpy pants? But that would be rather dishonest, eh? See...

wait, what's the good of upcycling old solar panels whose efficiency at power generation is very low, if still useful at all?

Very clearly a question.

What I don't get is why the question set you off so. Would you like to talk about that?

[macdoc]

you still have trouble parsing
....his question mark relates to "why would you?

his declarative statement is not related to it being in question ..it is stated as a fact.

whose efficiency at power generation is very low,

that is a statement not a question.
and that statement is wrong.

[pErvinalia]

What are you two arguing about this time?

[Svartalf]

same old same old, macdoc doesn't like me, so he yaps at me at any opportunity, and brian is trying to show he's not acting reasonably.