To your satisfaction, perhaps.
Tell me, do you know who paid the largest criminal fine in history? Do you think such an org would lie about something big?
To your satisfaction, perhaps.
Yes, I understand you have a rabidly anti-Trump take on this, but you skipped over my questions. Let me help you.
The largest criminal fine in history was imposed on the pharmaceutical company Pfizer Inc. in 2009. Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion in criminal and civil fines to settle allegations of illegally promoting certain drugs for unapproved uses.largests criminal fine in history?
I don't have to champion either.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:03 pmSomeone can be critical of JFK Jnr and the dubious research spin and dodgy protection racket stunts some of the drug companies go in for. Your problem is you've got to champion one or the other.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/drs-ma ... t-the-fda/More saliently, note the similarity between what Dr. Makary said four days ago and what Dr. Katz said 17 years ago, specifically that anecdotes can trump randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). It goes beyond that, though. Both portray evidence-based medicine as “dogma,” with Dr. Makary calling it that explicitly. Although the quote above by Dr. Katz doesn’t express such a view, other parts of his talk back then most definitely did, such as when he referred to the evidence used as the basis of evidence-based practice as “indoctrination.” It’s a message that’s common to quacks, antivaxxers, and all manner of science deniers, portraying science that they don’t like as a religion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests