American Politics from 2019 on

[Joe]

The email is literally from the nom de plume Marco Polo.

Well, Marco Polo was nice enough to confirm the article was correct to rate the claim true.

[Cunt]

The email is literally from the nom de plume Marco Polo.

Well, Marco Polo was nice enough to confirm the article was correct to rate the claim true.

Funny, I'm looking at the email to alex at snopes. It ends...

Sincerely,

Garrett Ziegler
Founder
marcopolo501c3.org

[pErvinalia]

Look at the name of the email account. It's Marco Polo.

[Tero]

Not sure what the issue is you are having here.

The entire "book" is at the website Marco Polo referred to in his blog. https://bidenreport.com/#p=133 (some 600 pdf pages)

It shows money moving around. Since Hunter and Archer had an investment company...er...moneyu would be invested for clients.

there are some girly pictures scattered here and there to make it look like it all came from the laptop.

[L'Emmerdeur]

All highly relevant, certainly. Maybe the FBI will be kind enough to announce an investigation into President Biden just a few days before the presidential election.

[Joe]

The email is literally from the nom de plume Marco Polo.

Well, Marco Polo was nice enough to confirm the article was correct to rate the claim true.

Funny, I'm looking at the email to alex at snopes. It ends...

Sincerely,

Garrett Ziegler
Founder
marcopolo501c3.org

What does it begin with? Funny how you omitted that, but then liars hate factcheckers and haters are gonna hate.

[Cunt]

Yes, there it is.

They are doing a bang-up job covering up the laptop with 'fact-checks' like this.

Why should they care about getting his name right, or the facts, when they can get away with this shit and still be considered a 'fact-check'?

[Tero]

Biden avoids situation where he would be accused of hair sniffing.

Avigail Idan, a dual Israeli-American citizen, was confirmed to have been released Sunday. Edan was taken hostage on Oct. 7 after Hamas terrorists murdered her parents in front of her.

"Thank God she's home," President Biden told reporters. "I wish I was there to hold her."

[Joe]

Yes, there it is.

They are doing a bang-up job covering up the laptop with 'fact-checks' like this.

Why should they care about getting his name right, or the facts, when they can get away with this shit and still be considered a 'fact-check'?

Yeah, nothing says cover-up like free advertising.



This Marco knob should be thanking Snopes for letting people know they can get the "lowdown" on Hunter Biden for $50, and where they can get it.

[Tero]

I'm still confused. You can read it for free. And James Comer has profiled the Biden Crime Family crimes on the house website. With the same numbers. No girly photos.

Joe Biden lent his brother 200 000 and it came back. But his brother got it from China. Or Burisma. Hard to tell. There is a picture of Burisma crooks in the book with Putin. That must explain that 200 000.

They still can't explain how Joe helped Hunter help China steal cobolt from Africa. And they did not exactly steal it. They bought it.

[Cunt]

You may not have noticed the corrections requested by Mr. Z, instead letting snopes fact-check something else.

[Joe]

You may not have noticed the corrections requested by Mr. Z, instead letting snopes fact-check something else.

Did you notice I posted little Marco's email? I fact-checked it too.

He's only right about one thing, he didn't have an interview with National Review. Snopes got that wrong, but linked to the National Review article which accurately attributed his remarks to a Fox New interview. That's the mark of a good fact check, they give you their source so you can fact-check them. It's smart to do that.

That's it. The rest was wordplay that didn't hold up to examination.

So, did you fact check Marco, or just blindly take his word for it?

[Cunt]

His word that his name was his name? I didn't have any trouble following it.

I even understood that the organization named had its own name.

Your misunderstanding here (and snopes') is why I am so dismissive of snopes and other 'fact-checkers'. They fall for too much (or maybe are deliberately 'misunderstanding')

[Joe]

His word that his name was his name? I didn't have any trouble following it.

I even understood that the organization named had its own name.

Your misunderstanding here (and snopes') is why I am so dismissive of snopes and other 'fact-checkers'. They fall for too much (or maybe are deliberately 'misunderstanding')

No, not that his name was his name. You clearly didn't understand Zeigler's objection. I'm gonna walk you through it one time, and then I'm done.

Snopes said, "Garrett Ziegler — who also goes by "Marco Polo" and Ziegler said, "I have never went by the nom de plume Marco Polo."

In case you don't know, the dictionary defines nom de plume as "an assumed name used by a writer instead of their real name; a pen name."

Now note the name at the top of the email. It's not Garrett Zeigler, it's Marco Polo. He wrote an email under the name Marco Polo. That's a nom de plume by definition. That it's also his company's name is clever, but irrelevant to this discussion. That his signed it with his real name is also irrelevant.



If you want to take his word, that's fine by me, but don't look for a response to that. I'll be too busy laughing at the two of you and your total self-own.

[Cunt]

I don't doubt how convinced you are.

If you are right, you should probably continue to trust Snopes.

I'll consider that they still seem to have you confused between the human, and the 501c3. Tricky stuff, names. Nearly as complicated as adjectives or pronouns.