American Politics from 2019 on

[Joe]

Wait - how could it pose a risk to national security?

I mean, if it isn't weapons, that is.

Secrets, sources and methods? Antidotes? A lotion that would regrow Putin's hair? Who knows? Nuland didn't say and Rubio didn't ask. You're theorizing in advance of the facts again.

And that's the problem with your argument, and the point of all the fact checkers, the UN Security Council, and the US Government. There's no evidence and all your questions don't change that. If you had any evidence, you would be giving us answers. To put it bluntly, you can JAQ, but you don't know jack.

That's no surprise, you're just a guy in rural Canada. But give this some thought: Russia is a major power with intelligence agencies good enough to steal secrets from the US, Urkaine is 17 percent ethnic Russian, and they can't get evidence of what the Ukrainian government is doing at what Nuland called their biological research facilities?

I don't know, but I know this. Russia made the claim, the burden of proof is on them and so far, bubkes!

[rasetsu]

Are you really this stupid? Because it sure sounds like it.

Are you really this stupid?

Banned again.

As a result of your recent actions, including making false accusations, you will be on a timeout for an indeterminate amount of time. During your timeout, I may or may not respond to any questions from you, at my discretion. During this time I may make comments on the substance of any of your posts, claims, or questions, again at my discretion. Do not expect replies during your timeout.

Thank you, and enjoy your timeout.

[Cunt]

Wait - how could it pose a risk to national security?

I mean, if it isn't weapons, that is.

Secrets, sources and methods? Antidotes? A lotion that would regrow Putin's hair? Who knows? Nuland didn't say and Rubio didn't ask. You're theorizing in advance of the facts again.

And that's the problem with your argument, and the point of all the fact checkers, the UN Security Council, and the US Government. There's no evidence and all your questions don't change that. If you had any evidence, you would be giving us answers. To put it bluntly, you can JAQ, but you don't know jack.

That's no surprise, you're just a guy in rural Canada. But give this some thought: Russia is a major power with intelligence agencies good enough to steal secrets from the US, Urkaine is 17 percent ethnic Russian, and they can't get evidence of what the Ukrainian government is doing at what Nuland called their biological research facilities?

I don't know, but I know this. Russia made the claim, the burden of proof is on them and so far, bubkes!https://twitter.com/KeithWoodsYT/status ... 4051992737

I know facts don't matter to you, outside of your fact-checkers, but Russia made the claim, not Creesh/BioClandestine.

Russia and China both backed the claim. You remember China, don't you? They had a US funded lab studying bats and corona viruses a few years ago, when a TOTALLY non-suspicious outbreak started TOTALLY by coincidence within a mile or two of their lab.

But ya, blame Creesh for 'spreading the conspiracy theory', rather than acknowledging the facts as they are.

That Nuland lady sounds trustworthy. You should see how she passes fact-checks!

[Joe]

Wait - how could it pose a risk to national security?

I mean, if it isn't weapons, that is.

Secrets, sources and methods? Antidotes? A lotion that would regrow Putin's hair? Who knows? Nuland didn't say and Rubio didn't ask. You're theorizing in advance of the facts again.

And that's the problem with your argument, and the point of all the fact checkers, the UN Security Council, and the US Government. There's no evidence and all your questions don't change that. If you had any evidence, you would be giving us answers. To put it bluntly, you can JAQ, but you don't know jack.

That's no surprise, you're just a guy in rural Canada. But give this some thought: Russia is a major power with intelligence agencies good enough to steal secrets from the US, Urkaine is 17 percent ethnic Russian, and they can't get evidence of what the Ukrainian government is doing at what Nuland called their biological research facilities?

I don't know, but I know this. Russia made the claim, the burden of proof is on them and so far, bubkes!https://twitter.com/KeithWoodsYT/status ... 4051992737

I know facts don't matter to you, outside of your fact-checkers, but Russia made the claim, not Creesh/BioClandestine.

Russia and China both backed the claim. You remember China, don't you? They had a US funded lab studying bats and corona viruses a few years ago, when a TOTALLY non-suspicious outbreak started TOTALLY by coincidence within a mile or two of their lab.

But ya, blame Creesh for 'spreading the conspiracy theory', rather than acknowledging the facts as they are.

That Nuland lady sounds trustworthy. You should see how she passes fact-checks!

Who is Keith Woods?

[Cunt]

No idea, but BioClandestine is still more convincing than you and your fact-checkers.

Mainly because he doesn't have to ignore politically inconvenient parts of the story, such as who is opposing investigation into the facts.

Like hiding the majority of the J6 footage, it's making it obvious who fears facts, and who can cope with them.

[Joe]

No idea, but BioClandestine is still more convincing than you and your fact-checkers.

Mainly because he doesn't have to ignore politically inconvenient parts of the story, such as who is opposing investigation into the facts.

Like hiding the majority of the J6 footage, it's making it obvious who fears facts, and who can cope with them.

You have no idea who the guy is, but you put a link to his twitter/X page in your post.

[pErvinalia]

...we know your opinion can't change. You already have yours.

He said without a hint of irony.

[Joe]

[Cunt]

No idea, but BioClandestine is still more convincing than you and your fact-checkers.

Mainly because he doesn't have to ignore politically inconvenient parts of the story, such as who is opposing investigation into the facts.

Like hiding the majority of the J6 footage, it's making it obvious who fears facts, and who can cope with them.

You have no idea who the guy is, but you put a link to his twitter/X page in your post.

I guess I was focused on the points he made, rather than his name. Looks like you can donate to him with a link right on X, you'll be glad to hear.

But it's not news that the right wing gets attacked more predictably than the left.

[Joe]

No idea, but BioClandestine is still more convincing than you and your fact-checkers.

Mainly because he doesn't have to ignore politically inconvenient parts of the story, such as who is opposing investigation into the facts.

Like hiding the majority of the J6 footage, it's making it obvious who fears facts, and who can cope with them.

You have no idea who the guy is, but you put a link to his twitter/X page in your post.

I guess I was focused on the points he made, rather than his name. Looks like you can donate to him with a link right on X, you'll be glad to hear.

But it's not news that the right wing gets attacked more predictably than the left.

It's not news that little bitches will cry.

[Svartalf]

So you've only got impugning Joe's character and intellect left now.

well, , you can't impugn inexistent stupidity and bad faith...

[Tero]

Political ads on TV
https://esapolitics.blogspot.com/2022/0 ... n-ads.html

[Cunt]

No idea, but BioClandestine is still more convincing than you and your fact-checkers.

Mainly because he doesn't have to ignore politically inconvenient parts of the story, such as who is opposing investigation into the facts.

Like hiding the majority of the J6 footage, it's making it obvious who fears facts, and who can cope with them.

You have no idea who the guy is, but you put a link to his twitter/X page in your post.

I guess I was focused on the points he made, rather than his name. Looks like you can donate to him with a link right on X, you'll be glad to hear.

But it's not news that the right wing gets attacked more predictably than the left.

It's not news that little bitches will cry.

Yes, victims sometimes cry.

And some people like to dismiss victims.

[Cunt]

While you guys mock victims of political violence, the current head of state in the US has been campaiging for Trump (at least according to a source not trusted by Joe)
https://t.me/bioclandestine/2572

We are going to have to start thanking Joe Biden and his clown show of an administration.

Why? They’ve red-pilled more people than ANYONE the last 3 years with their embarrassing gaffes, abysmal foreign policy, WW3, endless spending, 2SLGBTQIA+ insanity, Hunter scandals, document scandals, money laundering scandals, election fraud, January 6th hoax, vaccines failing, covid origins, Ukraine, Israel, weaponization of government to attack political opponents, the list goes on and on.

The Biden regime has been nothing but a 3 year campaign ad for Trump. Now when Trump returns, not only will Trump have the political justification to destroy Deep State actors, the public will support him in this venture because the Biden regime has been so blatantly disastrous, that it woke up a sizable chunk of the population.

The global awakening and massive shift in public perception could not have happened without the Biden administration showing their asses 24/7. They make my job EXTREMELY easy.

Not sure why they didn't include a photo of the hilariously disastrous non-binary nuclear waste boss, but maybe they couldn't fit him in, with so many other clowns.

[Tero]

In the news: "90-dollar turkeys!"
(Biden at fault)

I googled it: young turkey $28
Full size $35