So, you don't know the "establishment line" about the movie 2000 Mules, eh?
Did you even see the movie?
So, you don't know the "establishment line" about the movie 2000 Mules, eh?
I'm being questioned by a guy who can't say even the slightest thing against the far-left gender ideology.Joe wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:39 pmSo, you don't know the "establishment line" about the movie 2000 Mules, eh?
Did you even see the movie?
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Yes, of course. Do you know about Dr. Money, who would be the 'constructor'?
How a person looks is irrelevant to the facts of biology.
Sex is biology. However, an XY person might look like a female. This is because the frmale body is the default. It is modified to make a male in the early stages of a fetus.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
I noticed you ignored the tough question.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
I'll take your attempt at deflection as a no. This and your previous evasion suggest that you neither saw the movie nor know what the criticisms of it were and took someone else's opinion on faith.Cunt wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 5:24 pmI'm being questioned by a guy who can't say even the slightest thing against the far-left gender ideology.Joe wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 4:39 pmSo, you don't know the "establishment line" about the movie 2000 Mules, eh?
Did you even see the movie?
Don't worry though, I won't jump to conclusions about what you really think. Just observe what you feel ok writing.
It's good that you refrained from any lemming jokes.L'Emmerdeur wrote: I doubt the 'leftie' from the north has even watched it. Here's an examination of its claims and its supposed evidence for him to ignore and sneer at.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
This doesn't make a lot of sense as written. Do you mean that past 'buperty' (11-ish?) that children should be permitted to choose sterilizing drug treatments or amputation of body parts?
Right - no uterus, no opinion.As I consider the pregnant woman the only person to be consulted about her and her fetus. This is not an issue for governments. Or males.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
That's a dodge. There are different services available in different regions.
They don't 'identify as' male or female. Those are immutable.They may identify as male or female before 11-13 but there is no need to decide.
Do you mean cross-sex hormones?In most cases the treatment is hormones.
So you are in favour of genital mutilation, or breast amputation?Sex change operations are not routine. And somebody has to pay gor it. If the 5000 to 15 000 people a year are happier that way, it is their business. It may take a wait to age 18 in most cases.
But this isn't about birth defects. That's just a trick some activists use to avoid directly talking about the victims of malpractice in this VERY new branch of 'medical treatment'.
Children born with defects were often operated by the wishes of the parents. There are studies on that if that is one's own situation.
This happened to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dee_Palmer
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
I don't know French politics, but feel for you.
Strong ideas don't require censorship to survive. Weak ideas cannot survive without it.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 24 guests