American Politics from 2019 on

[Cunt]

Comer appears to be reluctant to hold any more impeachment hearings, preferring closed-door testimony and working in the shadows. Where's Cunt to complain about the lack of transparency?

It's plenty transparent. From Biden Sr claiming he had nothing to do with his son's business dealings, to the FBI raiding a journalist to confirm the authenticity of his daughters diary, everyone who wants to know, already knows.

Hell, Biden Sr. said he wanted a prosecutor fired or he would withold funding to Ukraine. Didn't someone get impeached over that shady business? Oh right, the guy following up and asking about it.

The clown show is just a clown show. But with less entertaining clowns.

[rasetsu]

Comer appears to be reluctant to hold any more impeachment hearings, preferring closed-door testimony and working in the shadows. Where's Cunt to complain about the lack of transparency?

It's plenty transparent. From Biden Sr claiming he had nothing to do with his son's business dealings, to the FBI raiding a journalist to confirm the authenticity of his daughters diary, everyone who wants to know, already knows.

Hell, Biden Sr. said he wanted a prosecutor fired or he would withold funding to Ukraine. Didn't someone get impeached over that shady business? Oh right, the guy following up and asking about it.

The clown show is just a clown show. But with less entertaining clowns.

Then why not have open hearings?

[Cunt]

Same reason they didn't release the J6 tapes

Or the Maxwell client list

Or Schiff's 'smoking gun' evidence of Trump Russia collusion

[rasetsu]

Same reason they didn't release the J6 tapes

Or the Maxwell client list

Or Schiff's 'smoking gun' evidence of Trump Russia collusion

So your argument is that Comer is trying to protect Biden, while trying to impeach him?

And they did release the J6 tapes, to Tucker Carlson. It's still in Republican control to do so.

[Tero]

Comer appears to be reluctant to hold any more impeachment hearings, preferring closed-door testimony and working in the shadows. Where's Cunt to complain about the lack of transparency?

It's plenty transparent. From Biden Sr claiming he had nothing to do with his son's business dealings, to the FBI raiding a journalist to confirm the authenticity of his daughters diary, everyone who wants to know, already knows.

Hell, Biden Sr. said he wanted a prosecutor fired or he would withold funding to Ukraine. Didn't someone get impeached over that shady business? Oh right, the guy following up and asking about it.

The clown show is just a clown show. But with less entertaining clowns.

Why do you repeat the Ukraine bullshit? Nobody here belives it. Half the Trump voters don't. They are just mad at the deep state getting to Trump.

[Cunt]

Same reason they didn't release the J6 tapes

Or the Maxwell client list

Or Schiff's 'smoking gun' evidence of Trump Russia collusion

So your argument is that Comer is trying to protect Biden, while trying to impeach him?

No idea, but you won't be allowed to see any of it.

You are expected to believe the narrative they give you though.

Can you think of one media smear against Trump that you have not fallen for? If you can't say, it might be because all those in all media are honest. Or it could be something else.

And Tero, which part do you think is 'bullshit'?

The facts? Or that the government hides all the evidence it can, from you voters?

[rasetsu]

Same reason they didn't release the J6 tapes

Or the Maxwell client list

Or Schiff's 'smoking gun' evidence of Trump Russia collusion

So your argument is that Comer is trying to protect Biden, while trying to impeach him?

No idea, but you won't be allowed to see any of it.

You have no idea what your argument is? I don't doubt that, because it looks incoherent.

Cui bono, Cunt. Cui bono?

[Brian Peacock]

Comer appears to be reluctant to hold any more impeachment hearings, preferring closed-door testimony and working in the shadows. Where's Cunt to complain about the lack of transparency?

I'm sure a non sequitur in the form of a very important and pressing question will arrive in short order.

edit: Oh, I see it did.

[rasetsu]

Can you think of one media smear against Trump that you have not fallen for?

I'll need a list of said media smears so that I can check. Please provide one.

[Cunt]

Same reason they didn't release the J6 tapes

Or the Maxwell client list

Or Schiff's 'smoking gun' evidence of Trump Russia collusion

So your argument is that Comer is trying to protect Biden, while trying to impeach him?

No idea, but you won't be allowed to see any of it.

You have no idea what your argument is? I don't doubt that, because it looks incoherent.

Cui bono, Cunt. Cui bono?

What argument?

That the government is hiding stuff from those who they rule over?

Can you think of one media smear against Trump that you have not fallen for?

I'll need a list of said media smears so that I can check. Please provide one.

The question was 'can you think of one?'

Thanks for answering clearly.

[rasetsu]

Can you think of one media smear against Trump that you have not fallen for?

I'll need a list of said media smears so that I can check. Please provide one.

The question was 'can you think of one?'

Thanks for answering clearly.

Oh, then fine. That Trump labeled immigrants animals. I didn't fall for that one. Can you think of one conspiracy theory about the media that you haven't fallen for?

Your argument that Comer has a reason to hide the truth about the Biden impeachment is what I was questioning. It seems that you are suggesting Comer has more to gain by hiding the truth about Biden than revealing it. I find it doubtful you believe that. Nor is it plausible as Comer can't seem to shutup or resist any opportunity to go on Fox News touting the last micro-event of his committee. In short, you're not making a sane argument.

[Cunt]

Can you think of one media smear against Trump that you have not fallen for?

I'll need a list of said media smears so that I can check. Please provide one.

The question was 'can you think of one?'

Thanks for answering clearly.

Oh, then fine. That Trump labeled immigrants animals. I didn't fall for that one. Can you think of one conspiracy theory about the media that you didn't fall for?

Yes. They said that they were censoring certain news. That wasn't true, it was their owners. I had given too much credit to the independance of journalists.

Your argument that Comer has a reason to hide the truth about the Biden impeachment is what I was questioning. It seems that you are suggesting Comer has more to gain by hiding the truth about Biden than revealing it. I find it doubtful you believe that. Nor is it plausible as Comer can't seem to shutup or resist any opportunity to go on Fox News touting the last micro-event of his committee. In short, you're not making a sane argument.

I'm not saying I know their motivations at all. But consider this - they can't prevent you from learning the truth. They CAN manage when you'll learn the truth.

Redactions, gag orders and 'sub-rosa' meetings aren't any secret.

Whatever their motivations, they are hiding what they can.

But you can see lots of the evidence already out. From Bubilinski's early confirmation that it WAS Hunters laptop, to the fact that Joe said he didn't have anything to do with Hunters business, only to be outed later.

It's all there in the Marco Polo site, for anyone to read. Of course many will insist on waiting until the 'secret work behind closed doors' rulers tell them what they should think of it.

Rather than looking for themselves, I mean.

[rasetsu]

Can you think of one media smear against Trump that you have not fallen for?

I'll need a list of said media smears so that I can check. Please provide one.

The question was 'can you think of one?'

Thanks for answering clearly.

Oh, then fine. That Trump labeled immigrants animals. I didn't fall for that one. Can you think of one conspiracy theory about the media that you didn't fall for?

Yes. They said that they were censoring certain news. That wasn't true, it was their owners. I had given too much credit to the independance of journalists.

The owners can't censor anything if the journalists themselves aren't complicit. So you've abandoned a valid conspiracy if the owners are indeed ordering the censoring.

[rasetsu]

Your argument that Comer has a reason to hide the truth about the Biden impeachment is what I was questioning. It seems that you are suggesting Comer has more to gain by hiding the truth about Biden than revealing it. I find it doubtful you believe that. Nor is it plausible as Comer can't seem to shutup or resist any opportunity to go on Fox News touting the last micro-event of his committee. In short, you're not making a sane argument.

I'm not saying I know their motivations at all. But consider this - they can't prevent you from learning the truth. They CAN manage when you'll learn the truth.

Redactions, gag orders and 'sub-rosa' meetings aren't any secret.

Whatever their motivations, they are hiding what they can.

Why? Why are they hiding what they can?

[Cunt]

The owners can't censor anything if the journalists themselves aren't complicit. So you've abandoned a valid conspiracy if the owners are indeed ordering the censoring.

Why are you talking about 'abandoned a valid conspiracy'

You sound incoherent.

The censoring is agreed-upon by everyone, such as in the pre-election censoring of the Biden laptop story.

Journalists DID leave over it. Greenwald left the Intercept, specifically over the Intercepts handling of the story.

Of course, the gullible still believe the story pushed by intelligence officials, even if it was clear dishonesty as published.