American Politics from 2019 on

[Joe]

Yeahbut, that judge fined Trump's lawyers $7500 apiece for using arguments that were rejected twice before. I guess he felt like he was being trolled.

[Cunt]

No matter how many of these attacks are shown to be bullshit, THIS one's going to get him!

I'll get you next time...

[Sean Hayden]

Trump's legal troubles predate his presidency by several decades.

[Cunt]

Trump's legal troubles predate his presidency by several decades.

Way back, one of the first attacks was to say there was a pee-pee tape with Trump and Russian whores.

Still waiting, by the way...so that story was bullshit.

Funny thing though - I don't know anyone who stopped trusting those sources about Trump. The next thing is accepted, and the next...never once admitting the previous false smear, even after it is fully exposed.

[Sean Hayden]

What he does with Russian prostitutes is none of my business.

[Tero]

Trump's legal troubles predate his presidency by several decades.

Way back, one of the first attacks was to say there was a pee-pee tape with Trump and Russian whores.

Still waiting, by the way...so that story was bullshit.

Funny thing though - I don't know anyone who stopped trusting those sources about Trump. The next thing is accepted, and the next...never once admitting the previous false smear, even after it is fully exposed.

Nice strawman argument. If there was no pee pee tape, everything else is false.

[pErvinalia]

He's a bot. Most of his posts are non-sequiturs. Just regurgitating right wing talking points.

[Brian Peacock]

...
Funny thing though - I don't know anyone who stopped trusting those sources about Trump. The next thing is accepted, and the next...never once admitting the previous false smear, even after it is fully exposed.

[Cunt]

...
Funny thing though - I don't know anyone who stopped trusting those sources about Trump. The next thing is accepted, and the next...never once admitting the previous false smear, even after it is fully exposed.

Is that the one where he tried to grab the wheel of the 'Beast', and then a cop shot Ashley Babbit?

Ya, that was a good one. Trump's cops could shoot a woman in the capitol, ON CAMERA, and no-one would pin it on him. It's not 5th avenue, but it shows how much people care about cops killing rioters.

[Brian Peacock]

...
Funny thing though - I don't know anyone who stopped trusting those sources about Trump. The next thing is accepted, and the next...never once admitting the previous false smear, even after it is fully exposed.

Is that the one where he tried to grab the wheel of the 'Beast', and then a cop shot Ashley Babbit?

Ya, that was a good one. Trump's cops could shoot a woman in the capitol, ON CAMERA, and no-one would pin it on him. It's not 5th avenue, but it shows how much people care about cops killing rioters.

Or one might say that the officers were trying to protect the nation's democratically elected representatives.

[Cunt]

...
Funny thing though - I don't know anyone who stopped trusting those sources about Trump. The next thing is accepted, and the next...never once admitting the previous false smear, even after it is fully exposed.

Is that the one where he tried to grab the wheel of the 'Beast', and then a cop shot Ashley Babbit?

Ya, that was a good one. Trump's cops could shoot a woman in the capitol, ON CAMERA, and no-one would pin it on him. It's not 5th avenue, but it shows how much people care about cops killing rioters.

Or one might say that the officers were trying to protect the nation's democratically elected representatives.

your photo didn't work, but that cop sure did!

When Trumps cops kill rioters, it's protecting democratically elected representatives. Got it.

[Cunt]

Funny, it worked when I quoted it. Must be my browser having issues.

[Brian Peacock]

Who are "Trumps cops"? These guys?

[Cunt]

Who are "Trumps cops"? These guys?

Trump was president. The police officer who shot Ashley Babbit was a Trump cop.

He shot a woman in the capitol building, and no-one even blamed Trump. He really CAN get away with anything!

[Brian Peacock]

Nah.