Media Bias

[aufbahrung]

Netflix Gaydar knows before you do?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66472938

How did Netflix know I was gay before I did?

After BBC reporter Ellie House came out as gay, she realised that Netflix already seemed to know. How did that happen?

(continued, mysterious of AI)

[L'Emmerdeur]

Oh, that nasty woman, how dare she laugh?

'Right-Wing Media Find a Way to Drag Hillary Clinton Into Trump Drama'

A number of right-wing commentators made it clear Tuesday that they didn’t care for Hillary Clinton’s response to Donald Trump’s indictment late Monday in Georgia for trying to overturn the 2020 election—even though the former 2016 presidential candidate said she took no “satisfaction” in Trump’s fourth indictment since March.

“I don’t feel any satisfaction,” Clinton told Rachel Maddow during MSNBC’s widely viewed 9 p.m. block. “I feel great—you know, just great, profound sadness that we have a former president who has been indicted for so many charges that went right to the heart of whether or not our democracy would survive.”

“This is a terrible moment for our country, to have a former president accused of these terribly important crimes,” the former secretary of state added. “The only satisfaction may be that the system is working.”

Yet it was Clinton laughing when Maddow introduced her that irked the likes of Kayleigh McEnany, co-host of the Fox News midday show Outnumbered, as well as Fox News contributor Tomi Lahren. Lara Trump and Newsmax host Eric Bolling also couldn’t resist complaining about Clinton’s apparent glee at the beginning of her interview.

“It’s so gross to see her laughing, positively giddy,” McEnany, Trump’s former White House press secretary, said on Fox. “Watching Hillary Clinton laugh… this isn’t a laughing moment. It’s a sad moment for our country, and I think that’s something we should all agree on.”

[Cunt]

Did you or anyone you know get butthurt by Mr. Musks move to let Carl Benjamin and his kind back on the platform? You may be eligible for a sarcastic sympathy emoticon.

Nope. Why does it bother you?

Nah, I like Carl, and even those I don't are welcome to their words.

I understand how many ideas need protection from criticism. It's the only way guys like Biden survive in the political world, after that diary came out, or his son's laptop was exposed. Of course, looking at who agreed to hide it is just bad manners.

[Cunt]

AP, being the trusted and unbiased news source everyone knows it to be, wrote...
https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden ... e08c027cee
"Since gaining the House majority in January, House Republicans have aggressively investigated Biden and his son, claiming without evidence that they engaged in an influence-peddling scheme."

This is a response from War Clandestine...
https://t.me/bioclandestine/2272
"Lemme put it this way.

If Trump had 20 shell companies and bank records showing millions of dollars flowing from foreign oligarchs to Don Jr., Eric, and Barron, the media would have wall-to-wall coverage 24/7 and liberal cities would be in flames.

“No evidence” my ass " "
So is the AP showing a bias, by pretending the claims are 'without evidence'? Hunter's fumbles have revealed plenty of evidence. Unless of course you are coached to ignore all of it.

...51 former intelligence officials agree, it has all the hallmarks of...something

[rasetsu]

[pErvinalia]

[rasetsu]

[L'Emmerdeur]

[Cunt]

O'keefe Media Group (OMG media lol) just highlighted another 'journalist' rejecting evidence clumsily.
https://t.me/OKeefeMediaGroup/571

Phil Bump of WaPo declared, “I have no idea what that means” and walked off the set when shown a text message from Hunter stating, ‘I have to give 50 per cent of my income to pop.”

When “There’s-no-evidence” meets evidence, witness the corruption in the journalist’s™ soul.

Quick! Someone attack O'keefe's character!

[L'Emmerdeur]

No need. O'Keefe and his former employees have done a bang-up job of that already.

Poor Hunter Biden. He had to 'pay for everything for his entire family for 30 years' and give half of his income to his father. All while sucking up crack cocaine! That monster Joe Biden exploited him horribly.

[Cunt]

No need. O'Keefe and his former employees have done a bang-up job of that already.

Poor Hunter Biden. He had to 'pay for everything for his entire family for 30 years' and give half of his income to his father. All while sucking up crack cocaine! That monster Joe Biden exploited him horribly.

Yes, breaking the Epstein/ABC scandal was impressive and significant. Imagine if people didn't know, and still trusted ABC to be 'news', in light of that kind of story breaking! Or the hidden camera interview with the Pfizer exec.

Poor Hunter, indeed. He complained a few times about paying for so much. He got paid well though, for his oil expertise in Ukraine. And metabiota, whatever that is. Filthy rich, and cranky that he had to share with his Pop.

No unbiased corporate media outlet could make a claim like 'without evidence' in the Biden crime family story. I guess they still have to act like everyone believes them though. Paycheck and all.

[Brian Peacock]

Who funds O'Keefe?

[Cunt]

Who funds O'Keefe?

Same as any news agency, I would guess.

ABC got caught covering up Epstein and the child sex trafficking.

Did you ever wonder who funds them? Or is it just OMG who gets that treatment?

[Brian Peacock]

Who funds O'Keefe?

Same as any news agency, I would guess.

ABC got caught covering up Epstein and the child sex trafficking.

Did you ever wonder who funds them? Or is it just OMG who gets that treatment?

Yeah to the first. Not sure what you're getting at for the second.

[Cunt]

Same thing - who funds the 'corporate media'?

OMG has been doing good work, providing hideable cameras to anyone who wants to expose some crimes, malfeasances and idiots boasting about criminal behavior. Often the best part of the story is how these hidden camera expose's are treated in a media loaded with bias.

Much more entertaining than watching most other corporate media presentations.