Scientific Proof Of God

[rasetsu]

Sam Finkelstein. But in his defense, he was drunk at the time.

[superuniverse]

[superuniverse]

[superuniverse]

[

[rainbow]

Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence. Who said that?

Dunno.

What is your evidence?

[rainbow]

Sam Finkelstein. But in his defense, he was drunk at the time.

Curceanu's underground lab is housed within the Gran Sasso National Laboratory, 1.4 km under the Gran Sasso Italian mountains. The lab stands on one side of the 10-km long highway tunnel which crosses the Gran Sasso massif, connecting L'Aquila and Teramo. "The location was chosen because it is basically free from cosmic-ray radiation sources above the ground, that could interfere with the experiment," says Curceanu. The experiment uses an extremely sensitive cylindrical detector, not much bigger than a mug, made from highly pure germanium. It is surrounded by shielding, made of layers of ultra-pure lead and copper, to shelter it from any background radiation coming from the rocks. After running the experiment for two months the team did not measure spontaneous radiation signals, constraining the feasibility of gravity-related collapse. In 2020, the team reported in Nature Physics that their negative result had helped them rule out the simplest version of the Diósi-Penrose model.

https://phys.org/news/2022-06-collapsin ... sness.html

[NineBerry]

[

Oh, a bird

[Strontium Dog]

Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence. Who said that?

Dunno.

What is your evidence?

Pretty sure you can't ask for evidence these days, it makes you a reprehensible bigot, or something

[Brian Peacock]

[superuniverse]

Now who do you believe: King Charles III or Nostradamus?

[rasetsu]

You seem to misunderstand my criteria for belief.

[JimC]

I wonder if the fate of Charles the first ever crosses his mind?

[superuniverse]

I wonder if the fate of Charles the first ever crosses his mind?

Well, anyone has the right to believe whatever they want without being attacked for it. Even the atheist may have valid reasons for their beliefs. Issues, however, arise when atheism enters the battle in the public marketplace of ideas.

I'm sure the fate of Charles I serves as an ominous warning and omen to Charley 3.


The UK is supposed to be a democracy. The existence of a King is a complete betrayal of what democracy stands for, unless, of course, the monarch uses his power to enforce democracy and, when this is accomplished, renounces his own power. I remember many years ago when I did attend a few classes at university a student said that democracy and capitalism are a contradiction. Nothing more truer has ever been said, yet this contradiction has somehow been able to preserve itself for centuries.

[Brian Peacock]

No argument here. Though I suspect the lesson the Royals take from the fate of Charles I is the one the dictates that every effort should be made to ensure that the general public not only accept the principle of a hereditary head of state but somehow feel that the monarchy is a source of national pride and institution vital to the well-being of society.

[Svartalf]

I wonder if the fate of Charles the first ever crosses his mind?

I assume you mean the english one, and what does that shortening have to do with anything?