Time travel? Show us...
Scientific Proof Of God
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
- rasetsu
- Ne'er-do-well
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
- About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I don't have to, darling. As long as it's a possibility, you can't rule it out. That's burden of proof, and it's yours.
And I will parenthetically add that your inability to understand this simple fact basically eliminates your credibility regarding anything else. If you cannot get something so basic correct, there's no reason to believe you are correct on anything else. Your obvious lack of competence tells us that we can just ignore your feeble rantings.
And I will parenthetically add that your inability to understand this simple fact basically eliminates your credibility regarding anything else. If you cannot get something so basic correct, there's no reason to believe you are correct on anything else. Your obvious lack of competence tells us that we can just ignore your feeble rantings.
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
You have no idea what you are talking about, moron lolrasetsu wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 2:43 amI don't have to, darling. As long as it's a possibility, you can't rule it out. That's burden of proof, and it's yours.
And I will parenthetically add that your inability to understand this simple fact basically eliminates your credibility regarding anything else. If you cannot get something so basic correct, there's no reason to believe you are correct on anything else. Your obvious lack of competence tells us that we can just ignore your feeble rantings.
How is the burden of proof mine when you make the assertion? You are right that I know nothing about madness compared to you, big boy...
And your broken mind makes you pretty useless except to the bonerless geezers around here who are trying their best to get an erection from their former days.
- rasetsu
- Ne'er-do-well
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
- About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I asserted that you haven't ruled out time travel. Given that you haven't, my burden was easily met.superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 3:51 amYou have no idea what you are talking about, moron lolrasetsu wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 2:43 amI don't have to, darling. As long as it's a possibility, you can't rule it out. That's burden of proof, and it's yours.
And I will parenthetically add that your inability to understand this simple fact basically eliminates your credibility regarding anything else. If you cannot get something so basic correct, there's no reason to believe you are correct on anything else. Your obvious lack of competence tells us that we can just ignore your feeble rantings.
How is the burden of proof mine when you make the assertion? You are right that I know nothing about madness compared to you, big boy...
And your broken mind makes you pretty useless except to the bonerless geezers around here who are trying their best to get an erection from their former days.
Your move, genius. Got that proof of the impossibility of time travel ready?

- rasetsu
- Ne'er-do-well
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
- About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Time travel to the past is theoretically possible in certain general relativity spacetime geometries that permit traveling faster than the speed of light, such as cosmic strings, traversable wormholes, and Alcubierre drives. The theory of general relativity does suggest a scientific basis for the possibility of backward time travel in certain unusual scenarios, although arguments from semiclassical gravity suggest that when quantum effects are incorporated into general relativity, these loopholes may be closed. These semiclassical arguments led Stephen Hawking to formulate the chronology protection conjecture, suggesting that the fundamental laws of nature prevent time travel, but physicists cannot come to a definite judgment on the issue without a theory of quantum gravity to join quantum mechanics and general relativity into a completely unified theory.
Wikipedia || Time travel
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74016
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
superuniverse, you have been repeatedly warned about your personal attacks on other members, but have continued to offend. You are suspended for 3 months.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40901
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Given his state, it's normal he can't realize that...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- rainbow
- Posts: 13733
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet. - Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
At this rate, I'll never find out if Superverse's God is the kind, loving, forgiving one
...or the hatefulful, vengeful cruel one.
This is quite the dilemma.

I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39705
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Just sayin'William Shakespeare wrote:O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I!
Is it not monstrous that this player here,
But in a fiction, in a dream of passion,
Could force his soul so to his own conceit
That from her working all his visage wann’d,
Tears in his eyes, distraction in’s aspect,
A broken voice, and his whole function suiting
With forms to his conceit? and all for nothing!
For Hecuba!
What’s Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba,
That he should weep for her? What would he do,
Had he the motive and the cue for passion
That I have? He would drown the stage with tears
And cleave the general ear with horrid speech,
Make mad the guilty and appal the free,
Confound the ignorant, and amaze indeed
The very faculties of eyes and ears. Yet I,
A dull and muddy-mettled rascal, peak,
Like John-a-dreams, unpregnant of my cause,
And can say nothing; no, not for a king,
Upon whose property and most dear life
A damn’d defeat was made. Am I a coward?
Who calls me villain? breaks my pate across?
Plucks off my beard, and blows it in my face?
Tweaks me by the nose? gives me the lie i’ the throat,
As deep as to the lungs? who does me this?
Ha!
‘Swounds, I should take it: for it cannot be
But I am pigeon-liver’d and lack gall
To make oppression bitter, or ere this
I should have fatted all the region kites
With this slave’s offal: bloody, bawdy villain!
Remorseless, treacherous, lecherous, kindless villain!
O, vengeance!
Why, what an ass am I! This is most brave,
That I, the son of a dear father murder’d,
Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell,
Must, like a whore, unpack my heart with words,
And fall a-cursing, like a very drab,
A scullion!
Fie upon’t! foh! About, my brain! I have heard
That guilty creatures sitting at a play
Have by the very cunning of the scene
Been struck so to the soul that presently
They have proclaim’d their malefactions;
For murder, though it have no tongue, will speak
With most miraculous organ. I’ll have these players
Play something like the murder of my father
Before mine uncle: I’ll observe his looks;
I’ll tent him to the quick: if he but blench,
I know my course. The spirit that I have seen
May be the devil: and the devil hath power
To assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps
Out of my weakness and my melancholy,
As he is very potent with such spirits,
Abuses me to damn me: I’ll have grounds
More relative than this: the play ‘s the thing
Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the king.
-- Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2

Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Sean Hayden
- Microagressor
- Posts: 18798
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:55 pm
- About me: recovering humanist
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
"With less regulation on the margins we expect the financial sector to do well under the incoming administration” —money manager
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
- rainbow
- Posts: 13733
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet. - Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I predicted you'd be back...
Does that make me a Prophet?

Does that make me a Prophet?
Supper's ReadyWith the guards of Magog, swarming around
The Pied Piper takes his children underground
Dragons coming out of the sea
Shimmering silver head of wisdom looking at me
He brings down the fire from the skies
You can tell he's doing well by the look in human eyes
Better not compromise, it won't be easy
666 is no longer alone
He's getting out the marrow in your backbone
And the seven trumpets blowing sweet rock and roll
Gonna blow right down inside your soul
Pythagoras with the looking glass reflects the full moon
In blood, he's writing the lyrics of a brand-new tune

I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I feel the memento mori theme deals with the importance of living the virtuous life now because one day you will be judged for it. Atheists see in it the meaning that death is the
final termination, so live life to the fullest now. The atheist take is right about the need for living life to the fullest, but death is not the end.
final termination, so live life to the fullest now. The atheist take is right about the need for living life to the fullest, but death is not the end.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests