Scientific Proof Of God
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40587
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Then again, we have little inkling about what perversion of the mind leads the believers to not see why it ought to, what do I say? must! be dismissed.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
But Nostradamus deals with the universal, the inevitable, the forces of historical change, the totality of time and space...
What do you deal with?
- rainbow
- Posts: 13618
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Failed to predict Brexit, and doesn't know the difference between Portugal and Spain.superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:55 amBut Nostradamus deals with the universal, the inevitable, the forces of historical change, the totality of time and space...
Not ver' reliable this Nostradamus fellow, what?
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- rasetsu
- Ne'er-do-well
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
- About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Dead people don't deal with anything. And he didn't deal very well with those things while alive, as we've seen.superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:55 amBut Nostradamus deals with the universal, the inevitable, the forces of historical change, the totality of time and space...
What do you deal with?
Trying and failing is admirable, but hardly an impressive feat. Hell, I can do that.
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
It's kinda humorous that you think you can talk on these matters. You fail to see what is obvious to everyone else.rasetsu wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 12:57 pmDead people don't deal with anything. And he didn't deal very well with those things while alive, as we've seen.superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:55 amBut Nostradamus deals with the universal, the inevitable, the forces of historical change, the totality of time and space...
What do you deal with?
Trying and failing is admirable, but hardly an impressive feat. Hell, I can do that.
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 38758
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Who's 'everyone' btw?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- rainbow
- Posts: 13618
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
- Location: Africa
- Contact:
- rasetsu
- Ne'er-do-well
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:04 pm
- About me: Move along. Nothing to see here.
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
It's not obvious to everyone else that Nostradamus succeeded. You just mark yourself as a teller of falsehoods.superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 5:24 pmIt's kinda humorous that you think you can talk on these matters. You fail to see what is obvious to everyone else.rasetsu wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 12:57 pmDead people don't deal with anything. And he didn't deal very well with those things while alive, as we've seen.superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:55 amBut Nostradamus deals with the universal, the inevitable, the forces of historical change, the totality of time and space...
What do you deal with?
Trying and failing is admirable, but hardly an impressive feat. Hell, I can do that.
Why should I listen to someone who through ignorance or malice spreads bullshit?
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40587
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
anyway, just telling people to look at nostre dame is argument of authority, not a scientific proof
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
It's an argument from religious truth, which is absolute.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40587
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Well, that may be as you see it, but seeing how the guy did have to be ultra cautious of trouble with the Church until his royal patronage was firm enough to shield him some, I strongly doubt any truth in there is divine or religious in nature.
Also, it's still an argumentum ab auctoritate, which is not at all what you promised in this thread when you created it.
So kindly fuck off, go preach to your choir, and come back only when you're willing and able to deliver on a scientific proof, or at least argue truthfuly, honestly, rationally, and in good faith, all qualities you seem to have a great scarcity of.
Also, it's still an argumentum ab auctoritate, which is not at all what you promised in this thread when you created it.
So kindly fuck off, go preach to your choir, and come back only when you're willing and able to deliver on a scientific proof, or at least argue truthfuly, honestly, rationally, and in good faith, all qualities you seem to have a great scarcity of.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73481
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
superuniverse wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:37 pm
It's an argument from religious truth, which is absolute crap.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40587
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Jim, am I going to get in trouble for my previous post, or is it in line?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 73481
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Nothing wrong with that post, Svarty...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 40587
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests