Media Bias

[Joe]

Fact-checkers are reported as biased, but NOT by their democrats.

Snopes says.

[pErvinalia]

Fact-checkers can't define 'woman', or the distinction between woman and female, so their other work is probably as muddied by politics.

What fact-checkers can't define 'woman'?

[Cunt]

Can you?

Clearly, and without a lesson on the theories of John Money?

[pErvinalia]

You made a claim. Can you back it up?

[Sean Hayden]

We don't need a perfect definition Cunt. You just give the definition you know and work from there. We do this with all things that entail vagueness.

We are not observing a problem with language that we don't know how to work with.

This is purely a political problem.

[Brian Peacock]

It'll be about genitals. It's always about genitals with them folk.

[pErvinalia]

Have you seen Tucker Carlson's homoerotic ball tanning clip?

[Brian Peacock]

:shudder:

[Joe]

I don't pay much attention to Tucker Carlson, but I've seen some reaction to the ball tanning thing. I'm holding out to see if our resident fitness expert endorses it.

[Cunt]

We don't need a perfect definition Cunt. You just give the definition you know and work from there.

Adult human female.

We do this with all things that entail vagueness.

We are not observing a problem with language that we don't know how to work with.

This is purely a political problem.

Yup.

Political wankers have to soften reality, to milk votes from every possible corner.

For example, some might come in and promote the work of John Money, but before you listen to them, I suggest checking out his work.

[Sean Hayden]

Unfortunately denying vagueness is a kind of softening of reality too.

[L'Emmerdeur]

Unfortunately denying vagueness is a kind of softening of reality too.

Well said.

[Cunt]

I'll pose this question to you too, L'Emm

Which media smears do you recognize and openly condemn? I mean the popular ones, that are easy to see as smears.

Seems no-one thinks they've fallen for anything, but with trust in corporate news at an all-time low, something seems a bit off about this group.

Heck, Hermit was even here shitting on that Rittenhouse kid, who was only guilty of defending himself against an attacking pedophile, a man who crossed state lines to riot and assault him, and getting mistreated by an unfair prosecution team.

Probably doesn't even know who 'flufferboi' was (someone on the prosecution team, but we never got the full story on it)

[Hermit]

Heck, Hermit was even here shitting on that Rittenhouse kid, who was only guilty of defending himself...

Thanks for the opportunity comment on the kid again.



The court found him not guilty, but to me the verdict was a miscarriage of justice. The way Rittenhouse pranced about, brandishing his assault style rifle and taunting the protesters didn't look all that self-defensive. In fact, his behaviour was sufficiently provocative for them to feel threatened by him.

[pErvinalia]

But the guy attacking him was a pedophile!