In that case, if there is any actionable content, one would expect a court case in due course, where rumours and political points scoring have no place...

In that case, if there is any actionable content, one would expect a court case in due course, where rumours and political points scoring have no place...
How exactly do you convince 50 current and former intel officials to flush their reputations down the toilet in public?
Just ask?
Both you and Gaetz are wanting a little more from the FBI, and their investigation of the laptop.
It's almost like the FBI is trying to build a case that will stand up in court, and don't want to give a clever defense attorney something to use against them in the trial. As Merrick Garland, the FBI Director's boss, said, "It's our longstanding norm to not comment on ongoing investigations. The best way to undermine an investigation is to say things out of court about how they're going."Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 4:27 amBoth you and Gaetz are wanting a little more from the FBI, and their investigation of the laptop.
They are taking their sweet time about looking into it. It's almost like they don't want to...something.
The strangest thing is that so many news orgs, plus facebook and twitter, all lockstepped along until now. There isn't really new evidence, or I don't think so. Just new talk about it.
That seems an apt description, but it makes me cautious about dismissing him because of it.
I'm glad to be a total bastard, and still can't., enjoy the presumption of innocence. Hunter Biden too.
Only a total bastard would deny that.![]()
Staying on topic, Maxwell is a good example of why the FBI isn't saying anything about Hunter's laptop, Gaetz's sex trafficking, or Trump and Eastman's obstruction allegations. She got a fair trial and was convicted by a jury, but got to appeal for a new trial because a juror didn't disclose he'd been sexually abused on his juror questionnaire. She lost, but one mistake put an entire prosecution and trial at risk of being tossed out.Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:02 pmThat seems an apt description, but it makes me cautious about dismissing him because of it.
Even ass monkey's deserve just treatment.
I'm glad to be a total bastard, and still can't., enjoy the presumption of innocence. Hunter Biden too.
Only a total bastard would deny that.![]()
I've been thinking about the Maxwell case. She doesn't get a new trial, was convicted of trafficking kids for sex, and the customers remain cloaked in black highlighter.
Yes, but my other point is that if Maxwell's victims were serving her other (blackmail) victims, that might explain why all this secrecy about her customers, now that her case is complete.Joe wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:36 pmStaying on topic, Maxwell is a good example of why the FBI isn't saying anything about Hunter's laptop, Gaetz's sex trafficking, or Trump and Eastman's obstruction allegations. She got a fair trial and was convicted by a jury, but got to appeal for a new trial because a juror didn't disclose he'd been sexually abused on his juror questionnaire. She lost, but one mistake put an entire prosecution and trial at risk of being tossed out.Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:02 pmThat seems an apt description, but it makes me cautious about dismissing him because of it.
Even ass monkey's deserve just treatment.
I'm glad to be a total bastard, and still can't., enjoy the presumption of innocence. Hunter Biden too.
Only a total bastard would deny that.![]()
I've been thinking about the Maxwell case. She doesn't get a new trial, was convicted of trafficking kids for sex, and the customers remain cloaked in black highlighter.
And defendants don't always lose. All the work done to get Bill Cosby convicted was for nothing because prosecutors screwed up and used a deposition Cosby made under an unwritten immunity deal ten years earlier. How do you think all the women he abused feel now?
These two cases further illustrate Garland's point.
Of course, politicians, irresponsible media bloviators, and random folk on the internet will fill the silence with speculative conspiracy theories to make money, advance their careers, or just feel special. The rest of us will wait for something to actually happen before spending much time on it.![]()
Yes,...................if.....................................................,......might.......................................................................................................................................Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 11:46 pmYes, but my other point is that if Maxwell's victims were serving her other (blackmail) victims, that might explain why all this secrecy about her customers, now that her case is complete.Joe wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:36 pmStaying on topic, Maxwell is a good example of why the FBI isn't saying anything about Hunter's laptop, Gaetz's sex trafficking, or Trump and Eastman's obstruction allegations. She got a fair trial and was convicted by a jury, but got to appeal for a new trial because a juror didn't disclose he'd been sexually abused on his juror questionnaire. She lost, but one mistake put an entire prosecution and trial at risk of being tossed out.Cunt wrote: ↑Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:02 pmThat seems an apt description, but it makes me cautious about dismissing him because of it.
Even ass monkey's deserve just treatment.
I'm glad to be a total bastard, and still can't., enjoy the presumption of innocence. Hunter Biden too.
Only a total bastard would deny that.![]()
I've been thinking about the Maxwell case. She doesn't get a new trial, was convicted of trafficking kids for sex, and the customers remain cloaked in black highlighter.
And defendants don't always lose. All the work done to get Bill Cosby convicted was for nothing because prosecutors screwed up and used a deposition Cosby made under an unwritten immunity deal ten years earlier. How do you think all the women he abused feel now?
These two cases further illustrate Garland's point.
Of course, politicians, irresponsible media bloviators, and random folk on the internet will fill the silence with speculative conspiracy theories to make money, advance their careers, or just feel special. The rest of us will wait for something to actually happen before spending much time on it.![]()
Of course, that all starts by assuming it was the roots of an elite child-trafficking honey-pot ring, and that isn't the only possible reason why the FBI doesn't seem interested in pursuing some cases.
The FBI may be mysterious, but the media bias is at least on full display. Most were willing to pretend the Biden laptop was 'Russian Disinformation'. I wonder what lies they have moved on to now...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests