Your rhetorical question amuses me. Adherents of various strands of religions have killed each other for thousands of years over the issue of which one owns The Truth©™. Care to identify what the truth is, which religions have owned it for thousands of years and how you can test for the justifiability of such claimed truth?superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:38 amWhy would religions exist for thousands of years if people did not find truth in them or want them? No one forces people into religion, except the inquisition and my crew. Lol
Scientific Proof Of God
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39933
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Why should religions exist for the next thousand years if people do not find truth in them or want them?superuniverse wrote:Why would religions exist for thousands of years if people did not find truth in them or want them? No one forces people into religion, except the inquisition and my crew. Lol
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41035
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Hermit wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:45 amYour rhetorical question amuses me. Adherents of various strands of religions have killed each other for thousands of years over the issue of which one owns The Truth©™. Care to identify what the truth is, which religions have owned it for thousands of years and how you can test for the justifiability of such claimed truth?superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:38 amWhy would religions exist for thousands of years if people did not find truth in them or want them? No one forces people into religion, except the inquisition and my crew. Lol

Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41035
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Because they want them as they find some kind of comfort against existential despair, which is why they believe they hold truth, since it's far easier to believe in woo than to face some harsh realities.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:25 amWhy should religions exist for the next thousand years if people do not find truth in them or want them?superuniverse wrote:Why would religions exist for thousands of years if people did not find truth in them or want them? No one forces people into religion, except the inquisition and my crew. Lol
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
People were for years forced to attend a place of worship. They had no choice pray to a god or die. There are still plenty of communities like that all over the world even in so-called first world countries. In the middle-ages you would be burnt at the stake for heresy. Great free-will.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41035
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Hey, nobody ever said there were no consequences to choosing to use your free will in ways the powers that be don't approve of.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Not necessarily. But because you are born and made liar the only language you understand is that of Power not of Truth> You understand and fear the power of the Police and the Military, and you obey immediately when threatened by them.Hermit wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:23 amNostradamus has? Depeche Mode? Herbert Marcuse?superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:05 amExactly, to the most important questions science has no answer.Hermit wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:03 amShow us where I claimed that human rights are scientifically provable.superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:37 amHermit the Clown,
Show us how Human Rights are SCIENTIFICALLY PROVABLE...
LOL![]()
![]()
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Pascal's wager was not in my mind, but yes, the similarity is obvious.Svartalf wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:59 amHermit wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:45 amYour rhetorical question amuses me. Adherents of various strands of religions have killed each other for thousands of years over the issue of which one owns The Truth©™. Care to identify what the truth is, which religions have owned it for thousands of years and how you can test for the justifiability of such claimed truth?superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:38 amWhy would religions exist for thousands of years if people did not find truth in them or want them? No one forces people into religion, except the inquisition and my crew. LolIndeed, Actually, the point you raise is one of the strongest objections to Pascal's wager... believe to avoid hell, but what flavor to believe in?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:47 pmNot necessarily. But because you are born and made liar the only language you understand is that of Power not of Truth> You understand and fear the power of the Police and the Military, and you obey immediately when threatened by them.Hermit wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:23 amNostradamus has? Depeche Mode? Herbert Marcuse?superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:05 amExactly, to the most important questions science has no answer.Hermit wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:03 amShow us where I claimed that human rights are scientifically provable.superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:37 amHermit the Clown,
Show us how Human Rights are SCIENTIFICALLY PROVABLE...
LOL![]()
![]()

Why do you persist in showing off that you passed the course summa cum laude?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
You wanna see what real Power looks like? Do you want us to squeeze your balls?
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39933
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I pay hairy sailor to do that for me. A far more honest exchange, and we both get a little of what we want out of the arrangement.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- rainbow
- Posts: 13757
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet. - Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God

Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:37 pmI pay hairy sailor to do that for me. A far more honest exchange, and we both get a little of what we want out of the arrangement.

I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Oh. Another non sequitur. You really can't help yourself, can you?superuniverse wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:20 pmYou wanna see what real Power looks like? Do you want us to squeeze your balls?
Reminder: This thread is titled "Scientific Proof Of God". You have spent 1622 posts over a period of more than four years failing to supply one.
Helpful hint: Our current thread dedicated to non sequiturs is over here.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yep, and only a few posters crazy enough to even talk on something like this...
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39933
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
You don't have to be crazy to post here, but it helps!
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest