AmeriKKKa

[Cunt]

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

[Hermit]

What makes me suspicious about those bleating on and on about racism, is that they only see certain colours as victims.

All those who can be shown to be statistically significantly worse off than others.

It's almost like they are judging victimhood based on race, or other immutable characteristics.

That is not even remotely the case. Would you like me to link to the reasons why I regard the blacks in the US as a victimised "race"? Again? They are the reasons they ("those bleating on and on about racism") keep going on about black Americans being victims. If you think otherwise, feel free to provide evidence for your assertion that "It's almost like they are judging victimhood based on race, or other immutable characteristics."

Speaking of victimhood, discrimination and immutable characteristics, what is your own take on the problem? Are black people in the US poorer than their non-black counterparts because they are victims of endemic racism, or because they are more prone to make shit choices?

[pErvinalia]

Hey Cunt, why is the property damage associated with the BLM movement unacceptable if the property damage that happened along side the black civil rights movement of the '60s was acceptable?

Are black people in the US poorer than their white counterparts because they are victims of systemic racism, or do you think they are poorer because they are prone to, as you say, making "shit choices"?

[Brian Peacock]

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that we've consistently done just that, from countering stories that people seeking asylum are 'crimmigrants' or that economic migrants are violent criminals, to opposing narratives that George Floyd was a violent unemployed gangbanger who presented a serious threat to the lives of the police officers who arrested him, to disputing the claims that the civil rights protests last year were nothing but an excuse for a violent mob to ransack and destroy businesses for fun and personal gain. Speaking of which...

If the property damage of the 60s civil rights protests was acceptable why is the property damage of last year's civil rights protests not?

Did you know that more people came out onto the streets, and for longer, in response to the public execution of George Floyd on 25 May 2020 than did after the assassination of Dr King on 4 April 1968?

[Cunt]

Again, people being discriminated against because of immutable characteristics that racists use to identify them is what racism is. You say you don't deny racism, but you appear to believe it's some sort of fictional horror story told by bleeding heart, pearl-clutching leftists.

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that we've consistently done just that

I haven't seen you do 'just that'.

Media have used a bunch of police shootings to push their story about police being racist...so some of them were bullshit (meaning they turned out to be justified police actions).

Can you tell me about one of THOSE?

I of course recognize that you can safely say what you did about certain cases, but some of the media lies were lies. You either can tell me about one, or you help me make my point that you simply cannot.

Go ahead, tell me what you notice that runs counter to the narrative.

[Brian Peacock]

Again, people being discriminated against because of immutable characteristics that racists use to identify them is what racism is. You say you don't deny racism, but you appear to believe it's some sort of fictional horror story told by bleeding heart, pearl-clutching leftists.

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that we've consistently done just that

I haven't seen you do 'just that'.

Media have used a bunch of police shootings to push their story about police being racist...so some of them were bullshit (meaning they turned out to be justified police actions).

Can you tell me about one of THOSE?

I of course recognize that you can safely say what you did about certain cases, but some of the media lies were lies. You either can tell me about one, or you help me make my point that you simply cannot.

Go ahead, tell me what you notice that runs counter to the narrative.

What lies are are you referring to specifically?

[L'Emmerdeur]

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

'Media partners of government' is an interesting turn of phrase, which seems like poisoning the well to me. The implication here is that the media is untrustworthy because they collude with the government. That media in cooperation with 'government' has an interest in highlighting false examples racism. Not in an effort to combat racism of course, but to sow division in the citizenry, amiright?

We can put aside the fact that Trump told us the press were the Enemies of the People, and sicced his Department of Justice on members of the press. You apparently don't mean 'government' so much as 'Democrat government .'

Seeing as you've repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to adopt and promote conspiratorial thinking, and seeing as you provide no evidence to support your assertion that the horrible Enemies of the People are colluding with the Democratic Party to create a false narrative of racism in the US, your attempt to poison the well is a failure.

Why not just go ahead and point to Jussie Smollett? We all know you want to. I suppose it's because that bullshit racism story came out in the press during the Trump administration, which goes against the 'in cahoots with the government' narrative you're trying to promote here.

One Jussie Smollett doesn't negate the thousands of instances of genuine racism in the US which get reported in the press, no matter how persistently you bring him up. The press gave his story attention because he's a public figure who told a lurid tale. If you want to claim that the coverage of his story was motivated by a wish on the part of the press to promote false stories of racism, you'll have to support that claim with evidence. As it is, your post is so much hot air.

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

Of course not. As you've implied more than once, I'm far too cowardly to do that.

Racism, both in specific instances and in a systemic form, is a genuine issue in the United States regardless of what's in the press. Your desire to focus on the press rather than the racism doesn't change that.

[Cunt]

Again, people being discriminated against because of immutable characteristics that racists use to identify them is what racism is. You say you don't deny racism, but you appear to believe it's some sort of fictional horror story told by bleeding heart, pearl-clutching leftists.

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that we've consistently done just that

I haven't seen you do 'just that'.

Media have used a bunch of police shootings to push their story about police being racist...so some of them were bullshit (meaning they turned out to be justified police actions).

Can you tell me about one of THOSE?

I of course recognize that you can safely say what you did about certain cases, but some of the media lies were lies. You either can tell me about one, or you help me make my point that you simply cannot.

Go ahead, tell me what you notice that runs counter to the narrative.

What lies are are you referring to specifically?

Examples of the media bleating about an unjustified shooting of a black citizen, which later turns out to be fully justified.

There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any.

[Hermit]

Examples of the media bleating about an unjustified shooting of a black citizen, which later turns out to be fully justified.

Therefore...?

[Brian Peacock]

Again, people being discriminated against because of immutable characteristics that racists use to identify them is what racism is. You say you don't deny racism, but you appear to believe it's some sort of fictional horror story told by bleeding heart, pearl-clutching leftists.

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that we've consistently done just that

I haven't seen you do 'just that'.

Media have used a bunch of police shootings to push their story about police being racist...so some of them were bullshit (meaning they turned out to be justified police actions).

Can you tell me about one of THOSE?

I of course recognize that you can safely say what you did about certain cases, but some of the media lies were lies. You either can tell me about one, or you help me make my point that you simply cannot.

Go ahead, tell me what you notice that runs counter to the narrative.

What lies are are you referring to specifically?

Examples of the media bleating about an unjustified shooting of a black citizen, which later turns out to be fully justified.

There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any.

I'm wondering if you know any. If you think certain examples highlight some kind of cozy duplicity between the media and the Democrats intended to talk up racism where it doesn't exist then I'd love to see them. While your at it, in the interest of balance, perhaps you can find some examples of the media downplaying police shootings of black citizens, which later turn out to be unjustified. There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any, and then you can tell us what the fuck this has got to do with anything?

[Seabass]

Again, people being discriminated against because of immutable characteristics that racists use to identify them is what racism is. You say you don't deny racism, but you appear to believe it's some sort of fictional horror story told by bleeding heart, pearl-clutching leftists.

You seem to pretend it can't be both.

Do the media partners of government ever push bullshit racism stories?

Would you dare even write which of them were bullshit?

If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed that we've consistently done just that

I haven't seen you do 'just that'.

Media have used a bunch of police shootings to push their story about police being racist...so some of them were bullshit (meaning they turned out to be justified police actions).

Can you tell me about one of THOSE?

I of course recognize that you can safely say what you did about certain cases, but some of the media lies were lies. You either can tell me about one, or you help me make my point that you simply cannot.

Go ahead, tell me what you notice that runs counter to the narrative.

What lies are are you referring to specifically?

Examples of the media bleating about an unjustified shooting of a black citizen, which later turns out to be fully justified.

There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any.

Are black people treated worse by the justice system than whites because the US is systemically racist or because black people have more of a tendency to make "shit choices"?

[Cunt]

There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any.

I'm wondering if you know any.

Yes, that was my question. Are you saying that you aren't going to provide one?

I wish I had a quote in my signature, appropriate to this occasion.

[Seabass]

There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any.

I'm wondering if you know any.

Yes, that was my question. Are you saying that you aren't going to provide one?

I wish I had a quote in my signature, appropriate to this occasion.

Speaking of cowards, I have three questions for you:

1. Are black people poorer than white people in the US because they are victims of systemic racism or because black people have more of a tendency to make "shit choices"?

2 Are black people disproportionately killed and locked up by the justice system because of systemic racism or because they tend to make more "shit choices"?

3. Why was the property damage that happened around the 1960s civil rights movement acceptable, while the property damage that happens near BLM protests isn't?

[Brian Peacock]

There are several, not at all difficult to find. I'm simply wondering if you know of any.

I'm wondering if you know any.

Yes, that was my question. Are you saying that you aren't going to provide one?

No. I'm asking you to show relevance. Surely you can say what such examples would mean for the point you're making, whatever it is?

I wish I had a quote in my signature, appropriate to this occasion.

Meh.

[Cunt]

Thanks.