Republicans: continued

[Cunt]

We'd be interested in understanding your side. If you could find the courage to put your views out there and back them up.

Side of what?

The issue we're discussing.

I've no 'side' on it, so do go on with your discussion of the issue.

[JimC]

We'd be interested in understanding your side. If you could find the courage to put your views out there and back them up.

Side of what?

The issue we're discussing.

I've no 'side' on it, so do go on with your discussion of the issue.

From one of your earlier posts:

Crowder's show today (WE AGREE WITH THE CDC!!) talks about why he's right.

If you wanted, you could probably try to understand his side.

This was clearly a reference to the "confront the people with masks" line in an earlier post referencing the words of the Fox News host. You really need to have the guts to clearly articulate your position on an issue being discussed, rather than just saying we should all listen to some right-wing podcast. If you agree with it, summarise the thrust of it and explain why you agree, hopefully using rationally constructed arguments.

Shit or get off the pot...

[Fletch F. Fletch]

Tucker Carlson doesn't have a side rooted in reality. His latest screed, he knows is bullshit and he knows the people who believe it are not rooted in reality, or care about intellectual honesty. Obviously Carlson gave up intellectual honesty long ago.

[pErvinalia]

We'd be interested in understanding your side. If you could find the courage to put your views out there and back them up.

Side of what?

The issue we're discussing.

I've no 'side' on it, so do go on with your discussion of the issue.

So no courage, as usual. Throw a topic out there and then refuse to talk about it. And you wonder why you get accused of being a troll.

[Brian Peacock]

Cosplay politics.

[Tero]

Arizona senate doing research into elections, therefore the Democrats cannot stop them during "ongoing legislation" And, dead venezuelan dictator still believed to be manipulating US voting machines

In court Friday, Kory Langhofer, a lawyer for the Senate president, argued that Arizona’s constitution gives lawmakers immunity from civil litigation during the legislative session, which is now underway. He added that the Democratic Party does not have standing to ask a judge to dictate to the legislature how it should conduct an investigation to help it decide whether to pass new laws. And he said the audit will comply with Arizona laws governing ballot security.

The Arizona recount and audit come as Republicans across the nation push new legislation that would tighten voting rules and as polls show that a majority of GOP voters believe that Biden won the election through fraud. Trump, now ensconced at his private club in Florida, continues to insist that the election was stolen from him, though his loss was confirmed through multiple recounts, and dozens of judges rejected challenges to Biden’s win.

A live stream of the Arizona audit — showing footage from nine continuously operated cameras offering different views of the arena — is being provided by One America News, a right-leaning news outlet that has featured claims that the November election was fraudulent.

The document asserted that Dominion Voting Systems, which provides tabulating machines in Maricopa and elsewhere, had connections to Venezuela and that the company’s equipment is vulnerable to hacking by foreign powers. Dominion has said such claims are false and has sued a number of Trump allies who made similar assertions.

The document asserted that Dominion Voting Systems, which provides tabulating machines in Maricopa and elsewhere, had connections to Venezuela and that the company’s equipment is vulnerable to hacking by foreign powers. Dominion has said such claims are false and has sued a number of Trump allies who made similar assertions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html

[Cunt]

We'd be interested in understanding your side. If you could find the courage to put your views out there and back them up.

Side of what?

The issue we're discussing.

I've no 'side' on it, so do go on with your discussion of the issue.

From one of your earlier posts:

Crowder's show today (WE AGREE WITH THE CDC!!) talks about why he's right.

If you wanted, you could probably try to understand his side.

This was clearly a reference to the "confront the people with masks" line in an earlier post referencing the words of the Fox News host. You really need to have the guts to clearly articulate your position on an issue being discussed, rather than just saying we should all listen to some right-wing podcast. If you agree with it, summarise the thrust of it and explain why you agree, hopefully using rationally constructed arguments.

Shit or get off the pot...

It was a reference to that, and to the name Crowder gave his show. If you wanted to know why he thought he was right, why would you ask me?

I know, you are dying to have me argue a point you choose, but really, I don't like you that way.

I like you in other ways. Maybe you should find someone willing to have this discussion with you, instead of trying to force consent on someone who doesn't want to.

We'd be interested in understanding your side. If you could find the courage to put your views out there and back them up.

Side of what?

The issue we're discussing.

I've no 'side' on it, so do go on with your discussion of the issue.

So no courage, as usual. Throw a topic out there and then refuse to talk about it. And you wonder why you get accused of being a troll.

Someone else tossed it out, so check their courage.

I simply pointed out that Crowder had mention of the issue in his show.

Still looking for your discussion of it. I'm sure it is courageous and not at all troll-like. Can you direct me to the post though? All I can find of yours is trollish and timidly unclear...

I've made my position clear after hearing it, too. I agree with whichever Hodge twin said what he said. Of course, you might have missed that, because it didn't agree with your wishes.

[Sean Hayden]

I don't get the whole trolling in the news thing while sharing like we're friends elsewhere on the board.

[Tero]

It's just character. Some dogs bite, some don't. "He didn't mean it. He's very friendly."

[Cunt]

Funny segment the other day, where Crowder clips Joy Behar mis-gendering Caitlyn Jenner, who I think is about to run on a Republican ticket again Newsom.

What a world we live in! I imagine Ms. Behar will be properly cancelled for misgendering, or banned from twitter or whatnot. This might get complicated for the algorythms...

[Sean Hayden]

It's just character. Some dogs bite, some don't. "He didn't mean it. He's very friendly."

Where "character" is synonymous with a raging personality disorder?

[Joe]

I suppose his user name was a clue.

[Sean Hayden]

I guess he could've been an ironic cunt.

[Joe]

That's probably the most positive adjective I can think of that goes with cunt. I'm sure that's a personal failing on my part.

[Tero]

At least we don't have Anus.