If one truly had confidence in one's sources one wouldn't be so shy about linking to them. Seems rather cowardly actually.Joe wrote:Or you could quit trolling us with personal attacks, and link to it.
Of course, that might be too difficult.

If one truly had confidence in one's sources one wouldn't be so shy about linking to them. Seems rather cowardly actually.Joe wrote:Or you could quit trolling us with personal attacks, and link to it.
Of course, that might be too difficult.
Or at least not playing nice.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 5:09 amIf one truly had confidence in one's sources one wouldn't be so shy about linking to them. Seems rather cowardly actually.Joe wrote:Or you could quit trolling us with personal attacks, and link to it.
Of course, that might be too difficult.![]()
I told you why I didn't bother with the link. You can show I was right, by failing to check his side of the story, and just accepting all the media smears about him.
You had your chance to make your case for PV's veracity and couldn't. Trying to put that on me is bad logic.Cunt wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:35 pmI told you why I didn't bother with the link. You can show I was right, by failing to check his side of the story, and just accepting all the media smears about him.
Or, you could read that link, and see if you were given a false story about any of it.
Either way, I'm happy to see CNN humiliated again and again by him. I mean, they have no shame about their propaganda, or their deliberate lying to their rubes, but I get a bit of satisfaction.
It's really easy to believe any of the smears about him. A lot more challenging to accept some facts from a source that you clearly dislike (if you dislike him or PV, for some reason)
Crypto-Fascist CNN is only slightly better than the Neo-Nazi Fox News.Cunt wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:56 pmYou call it trolling all you want, I don't mind. (If you read carefully, you can see me giving permission in the post you quoted)
I call it showing CNN as the shit-smearers they are. If you were trying to make some point of disagreement clear to me, you missed it.
You weren't thrown into prison for criticising a cabinet minister of a Fascist State.
Someone should probably come along and call him 'far-right' or something...attack his character in any case, so they don't have to deal with the points he made.KEY DETAILS:
If requiring ID is "racist," then airlines, liquor stores, movie theaters, and gun shops are racist.
DEFINITION OF RACISM: "A belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race." SOURCE: Merriam-Webster
THE 15TH AMENDMENT:"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." SOURCE: Constitution Center
Majorities of whites (74%), blacks (73%), and other minorities (82%) say voters should be required to show photo identification before being allowed to vote. SOURCE: Rasmussen
87% of black people have some form of confirmed photo ID. SOURCE: ProjectVote (pg. 3)
90% of Latin Americans have a form of confirmed photo ID. SOURCE: ProjectVote (pg. 3)
Percentage of Americans who have ID vs. percentage who vote. SOURCE: CNN
87% of black people have ID, only 13% voted in the 2020 Election.
90% of Latin Americans have ID, only 13% voted in the 2020 Elections.
95% of white people have ID, only 67% voted in 2020 Elections.
97% of registered voters in Georgia have a valid ID. SOURCE: AJC
Voter ID laws have been shown to actually INCREASE turnout in states that recommend them, such as Georgia and Indiana. SOURCES: Heritage, Heritage
Specifically in Georgia from 2004 to 2008, turnout increased
140% among Hispanic/Latino voters
42% among Black voters
Compared to 8% of Whites
Come on man. You're either gaslighting or calling rainbow a liar. Which one were you aiming for?Cunt wrote:How would you know?
I mean, you might have been jailed for anything, but since you see fascism everywhere...
Oooh namecalling. That's classy!
Whereas you are so brave, behind your keyboard.
Ah, Mindromp is great for open discussion. You posted there on the 6th of April. It's the only post added to the forum in the past three weeks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests