Republicans: continued

[Tero]

Quite the change. I sense a personal hatred, as she was once a birther in the Obama era:

Republican Liz Cheney has suggested that Donald Trump could be criminally investigated for his role in provoking the siege on the US Capitol last month. Speaking on Fox News yesterday, the third most senior Republican in the House of Representatives referenced the “massive criminal investigation” under way in the US, saying it would look at “everyone who was involved” and that “people will want to know what the president was doing”.
Her comments come as the Senate prepares to begin Trump’s historic second impeachment trial, with arguments set to commence on Tuesday.

[Cunt]

I watch when the lefty's talk with him in interviews, or in person.

But I don't see a lot of 'reaction videos' of anyone. Perhaps the emotional reactions would sway me on some minor point, but I doubt it.

What appeals is his willingness to discuss difficult subjects. Ones so tough, no-one here discusses them either. I suspect all the righties here are just disinterested in certain issues.

Or maybe there aren't any remaining, so to get a rightie perspective, I HAVE to rely on discussions elsewhere.

As to what I've learned, I've learned that I'm not good enough to discuss these issues here. You guys must be good enough, but it doesn't come up.

Like the Lotus Eaters (not Republican, but nevermind) talking about some recent interviews, on a UK 'Womans Hour', where the question was asked 'are there any female imam's'. It was evaded, but the interviewer pursued it a few times.

What the LE pointed out, was the VERY obvious fact that Islam and Progressives have VERY different values about some things, and will be at odds. They went back and forth a bit, but again, I don't feel comfortable talking about that subject here, so maybe better people will be interested.

Until then, I'll enjoy their discussion on issues I don't see here.

[Sean Hayden]

Sounds good. I hope you'll keep in mind that we may just have different interests. There's a lot to talk about and we're unlikely, just because of the varied interests, to land on many of the topics guys in the popular media from either side are pushing. Obviously we're going to see more from the left, but ask someone here that pays attention to those media figures and they can confirm we don't hit anything like a majority of what they're worrying about either.

Christ, it's a lot to expect of some old man in the Netherregions to know who's president, nevermind what Maddow or Shapiro are talking about...

[Cunt]

The origin story which drew Ratz together was religious nonsense being examined by unfettered criticism. I miss that, and think the fetters are the change.

Now it's all about chasing off Republicans.



Crowder showing some of the concerning election irregularities, in case you haven't seen them.

[Tero]

This nutcase runs the GOP in AZ

I think they gave up recounting the Biden votes but she is now out to punish election officials forcdeclaring Biden the winner.

[Sean Hayden]

[Tero]

Now an old video of her groping a Donald Trump cutout has resurfaced perfectly showcasing how long her behavior has been an issue.
https://www.queerty.com/earth-marjorie- ... o-20210205
https://mobile.twitter.com/RzstProgramm ... o-20210205

[rainbow]

Many of us are from Republican households and states. It's unlikely that Cunt's more familiar with Republican thinking due to his exposure to modern media, than I am from a lifetime of learning.

But I think his efforts to understand Republicans is worthwhile. It may help to demonstrate better what he's learned if more of the objectivity of such an approach shone through in his posts.

Isn't Cnut from the People's Republic of Canada?

How would he know what Freedum is?

[pErvinalia]

And how come we no longer here about that Canadian hate speech law? Cunt couldn't shut up about it a year or two ago.

[Brian Peacock]

That's because the law says he's not allowed to talk about it.

[Hermit]

That's because the law says he's not allowed to talk about it.

And he's not allowed to talk about it in this forum either.

[JimC]

That's because the law says he's not allowed to talk about it.

And he's not allowed to talk about it in this forum either.

But he is allowed to vaguely waffle on about it, and ask us weird questions with a tenuous connection to reality...

[Cunt]

That's because the law says he's not allowed to talk about it.

And he's not allowed to talk about it in this forum either.

But he is allowed to vaguely waffle on about it, and ask us weird questions with a tenuous connection to reality...

Oh thanks! I was wondering how to navigate here, while believing different things that others.

I can see which issues you guys get triggered over. After awhile, I'll figure out how to keep enjoying this space. I hope before I go the way of Forty-Two, laklak and every other diverse voice.

[Joe]

[JimC]

Joe, can you play Melancholy Baby?