Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:15 pm
By the time you get called there'll have been enough people before you to know if the new and exciting vaccine gives you hairy palms and an uncontrollable urge to howl at the moon, or whatever.
I know there are already adverse effects. Pretty photogenic ones, in some cases. It's interesting how media portrays that stuff.
I already know that the difference in incidences of adverse effects, between the three vaccines, is a problem for someone else to work out. Someone good at that research.
The reason they offered for 'favouring' one, was simple, reasonable and clear. The media (and governments so far) seem to be 'favouring' the others, which doesn't exactly mean it makes scientific sense (except maybe economics)
Me, I would (for the moment) favour the plain-jane one, while hoping that a lot of brave pioneers do the testing on that 'mRNA' method, since it promises to be an upgrade.
Nineberry might want to check out the latest 'Dark Horse' podcast, and find out how they described it. They aren't likely wrong, but my understanding might be.
Shit, Piss, Cock, Cunt, Motherfucker, Cocksucker and Tits.
-various artists
Joe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:22 pm
he doesn't communicate
Free speech anywhere, is a threat to tyrants everywhere.