Media Bias

[pErvinalia]

Dinesh D'Souza is a known liar

I've asked him to let me know if you are an authoritative source. Until he does, I'll keep assuming you are so blindly anti-Trump, that you are pro Biden.

So D'Souza isn't one of those you like who declare their bias? Does this mean he pretends to be unbiased?

[Cunt]

I was kidding, I didn't really ask Dinesh.

But his opinion on Lemmy is just as sage and significant as Lemmy's opinion on him.

He made a movie - 'Infidel' that I've heard about. Don't really know his other work, other than the grave threat of chucking a few thousand dollars at the wrong candidate, the wrong way.

Not as sketchy as Zuckerberg spending half a billion, or Bloomberg spending more, but plenty sketchy enough that he might be a good filmmaker. The good ones do tend to be sketchy.

[Brian Peacock]

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/dan-c ... si-hostage

Is Crowder another sketchy source?

Or is this really what Crenshaw had to say?

Where does Crowder get his money?

[Hermit]

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/dan-c ... si-hostage

Is Crowder another sketchy source?

Or is this really what Crenshaw had to say?

Where does Crowder get his money?

Steven Crowder used to get paid by TheBlaze, owner of the "Louder with Crowder" Youtube channel for hosting it. Since December 2018 he is paid by Blaze Media, which was created when Glenn Beck and Mark Levin merged their respective companies, TheBlaze and CRTV.

[Cunt]

Where does Joe Biden get his money?

Oh, and the Epstein flight logs were declassified, I think. Trump was seen with him, you can check how many times he appears in the logs. You could also check if it was true that Trump helped investigators looking into Epstein. Or if it was true that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago for being a creep.

But I'm not convinced you care about where Joe gets his lavish lifestyle. I also doubt you even know who was investigating Epstein when he died in custody, nor where Epstein got his money.

But you investigate the HELL out of that exCanadian comic.

[Hermit]

You're just flailing now.

[Cunt]

I would guess that the media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story and connections is more evidence of your objectivity.

In other news, two UK judges have ruled that Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 violates the UN charter on human rights. Big win for free speech.

The lotus eaters covered it though, so your media will probably ignore the story.

In short, one can now use the insult 'pig in a wig', if it is offensive. I've been using it on my dog since.

[Cunt]

[Hermit]

I would guess that the media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story and connections is more evidence of your objectivity.

You need to explain how my objectivity can be linked to media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story. Did I have a hand in it? Have I ever ignored it? Something else?

[Cunt]

I would guess that the media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story and connections is more evidence of your objectivity.

You need to explain how my objectivity can be linked to media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story. Did I have a hand in it? Have I ever ignored it? Something else?

You are media. The Hermit show focuses on what it focuses on, and has a kind of objectivity.

It matches very closely with many other anti-Trump folks who have a very popular incuriosity about Epstein, where he got his money, how the various media orgs covered his stories, and again, who was investigating him. Did the investigation end with his death?

Anyway, I can see your focus firmly away from Epstein, and carefully and sharply focused on 'orange man bad'.

I honestly find media bias is more of a stand-alone complex, than a conspiracy in the traditional sense.

It's ok with me if you have such a strong bias, it just informs how much I trust your statements.

[Hermit]

I would guess that the media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story and connections is more evidence of your objectivity.

You need to explain how my objectivity can be linked to media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story. Did I have a hand in it? Have I ever ignored it? Something else?

You are media. The Hermit show focuses on what it focuses on, and has a kind of objectivity.

I am not suppressing the Epstein story. Search my posts. You'll find statements like

I have no doubt Weinstein is guilty of the sex crimes he was convicted of and that Epstein would have been found guilty of sex crimes, including rape of underage women, had he not committed suicide or been murdered. The behaviour of Andrew Windsor, a photograph and his association with Epstein leads me to believe that he also is a predatory sex criminal. Then there are Bill Clinton's 26 alleged flights on the Lolita Express and his visits to Epstein's privately owned island I never heard any denials about...

There is sufficient evidence for the existence of a paedophile (more accurately, hebephile) [network] with very rich, powerful and influential members, of which Epstein was one...

I have regarded Bill Clinton as a sexual predator ever since the Lewinski affair, over which the main stream media were like flies on shit, and more so when I heard it reported by the main stream media that he was a passenger on the Lolita Express 26 times. I don't know who the other hebephiles were, apart from him, Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein and possibly William Barr.

For the record, I regard it as very likely that ABC news tried to suppress Robach's story for fear of losing access to influential people in high places. Also, that people working in Buckingham Palace made all sorts of threats to the same effect. ABC news stood to lose a truckload of potentially profitable sources. Capitalism can be quite venal, eh? For what it's worth, I regard it as highly likely that Epstein died by being murdered rather than by committing suicide.

[Cunt]

You have very commonly known statements there, nothing at all contraversial.

Why not look into where his money came from?

Or why Eric Weinstein expressed such fear before releasing his story about his encounter with Epstein. That's a bit less known.

Or who was conducting the investigation, and did it end with his death?

The broader, smarter media is collectively ignoring it. Maybe you can understand some of these questions.

[Hermit]

You have very commonly known statements there

You wrote that the media bias in favour of suppressing the Epstein story and that I am the media. Accepting the latter nonsense for the sake of the argument, I have quoted snippets from my posts that cannot be described as "suppressing the Epstein story" by any stretch of the imagination. On the contrary, they are explicit acknowledgements of said story.

[pErvinalia]

It's almost as if Cunt has started trolling again...

[Brian Peacock]

Where does Joe Biden get his money?
...

It's an important question isn't it(?), because answering it points towards whose interests are actually being represented by these people.