All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Cunt]

Citation required

t 2020

[pErvinalia]

It's awesome how different suspicion is this year, compared to the 2016 election. You all have gained such strong trust in the corporations and other authorities who are in charge. They MUST have earned it with their aggressive censorship and marketing of cheap products.

Conspiracy theory. Where's your proof that Trump won?

[Cunt]

It's awesome how different suspicion is this year, compared to the 2016 election. You all have gained such strong trust in the corporations and other authorities who are in charge. They MUST have earned it with their aggressive censorship and marketing of cheap products.

Conspiracy theory. Where's your proof that Trump won?

I'm not suggesting Trump won, only that people suspicious of election results in 2016 are VERY ready to dismiss any suggestion of irregularity or fraud this go-round.

[JimC]

It's awesome how different suspicion is this year, compared to the 2016 election. You all have gained such strong trust in the corporations and other authorities who are in charge. They MUST have earned it with their aggressive censorship and marketing of cheap products.

Attempted sarcasm fail...

[Cunt]

Attempted sarcasm fail...

The quoted message has been approved by the alphabet people.

[NineBerry]

I'm not suggesting Trump won, only that people suspicious of election results in 2016 are VERY ready to dismiss any suggestion of irregularity or fraud this go-round.

The only person suspicious of election results in 2016 was Trump. He couldn't accept that less people had voted for him than for Clinton.

Clinton conceeded within hours.

Democrats were sour that again because of the voting system a candidate won who didn't have the popular vote. But that's not suspicion of the results, that discontent with the rules.

Also, the thing about possible Russian influence in the election doesn't include a suspicion that the results of the election were manipulated, only that popular opinion was manipulated using propaganda paid for by the Russian state.

[Cunt]

Also, the thing about possible Russian influence in the election doesn't include a suspicion that the results of the election were manipulated, only that popular opinion was manipulated using propaganda paid for by the Russian state.

The peepee tape never materialized, which cuts the legs off their whole complaint.

The few ads bought by foreigners was NOTHING compared to the 'in-kind' donation Twitter et al made to the Democratic Party this time.

I get it though. Aside from the videos, sworn afadavits, expert testimony and whistleblowers, there was NO evidence of irregularity.

[NineBerry]

There's a three-headed monkey behind you

[Cunt]

There's a three-headed monkey behind you

I remember that, rather than addressing the arguments made my Gad Saad, you went and edited his wikipedia entry, to try to...I don't know...make a point about your lack of knowledge of the subject.

It sticks in my mind when thinking about you so much, that I really doubt that monkey is there.


Damn shame, too. I would like to show it to my dog.

[Tero]

Predicting Jan tweet:
"Sleepy Joe and Crooked Kamala had a disastrous fake inauguration, no one showed up, unlike mine that had the largest crowd EVER. As soon as supreme court overturns the results we will have the greatest MAGA inauguration in history!"
(Not mine)

[Cunt]

i found it a bit unusual for Trump and Barr to be so pleasant to each other as they parted company.

He usually doesn't seem to mind trash-talking people he fired...

[pErvinalia]

It's awesome how different suspicion is this year, compared to the 2016 election. You all have gained such strong trust in the corporations and other authorities who are in charge. They MUST have earned it with their aggressive censorship and marketing of cheap products.

Conspiracy theory. Where's your proof that Trump won?

I'm not suggesting Trump won, only that people suspicious of election results in 2016 are VERY ready to dismiss any suggestion of irregularity or fraud this go-round.

Probably because Trump is a venal autocratic compulsive liar. What's more likely - there was fraud, or Trump is a sore loser?

[Hermit]

It's awesome how different suspicion is this year, compared to the 2016 election. You all have gained such strong trust in the corporations and other authorities who are in charge. They MUST have earned it with their aggressive censorship and marketing of cheap products.

Conspiracy theory. Where's your proof that Trump won?

I'm not suggesting Trump won, only that people suspicious of election results in 2016 are VERY ready to dismiss any suggestion of irregularity or fraud this go-round.

I can't recall anyone in this forum or anywhere else claiming voter fraud of the kind Trumpists are asserting.

[Cunt]

It's awesome how different suspicion is this year, compared to the 2016 election. You all have gained such strong trust in the corporations and other authorities who are in charge. They MUST have earned it with their aggressive censorship and marketing of cheap products.

Conspiracy theory. Where's your proof that Trump won?

I'm not suggesting Trump won, only that people suspicious of election results in 2016 are VERY ready to dismiss any suggestion of irregularity or fraud this go-round.

Probably because Trump is a venal autocratic compulsive liar. What's more likely - there was fraud, or Trump is a sore loser?

Geez, can't both be true?

[pErvinalia]

Sure. But what's the likelihood? Take Trump's sour grapes out of the equation and you've not got much left.