All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Brian Peacock]

Yeah, the deep state really needs to up its game.... or - now hear me out -- Hear. Me. Out - are they in charge already, and Trump is just there for window dressing....?

[Sean Hayden]

Well, you know I also believe we can replace the President with a quarter. I can't be the only one to have noticed.

[Sean Hayden]

There's a smell of freedum and democracy for Iran too. When does the exporting begin?

We're on our way now!

[Joe]

Yep, we're sending some more troops to Saudi Arabia. A defensive move of course.

[Sean Hayden]

--good guy

[Sean Hayden]

--bad guy

[Brian Peacock]

That oil isn't going to defend itself (with all the weapons the US and the UK have sold Saudi Arabia).

[Tero]

Wouldn't it be funny if some handful of tweets ended the Trump presidency?

[L'Emmerdeur]

The unremitting pattern of putting foxes in charge of henhouses continues.

'"Secretary of Corporate Interests" More Like It, Say Critics of Trump's Anti-Worker Labor Nominee'

Progressive groups and Democratic lawmakers expressed serious concerns Thursday about corporate attorney Eugene Scalia—President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Labor Department—as the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee met to consider his nomination.

"Instead of nominating a Secretary of Labor, President Trump has nominated a Secretary of Corporate Interests," declared Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the committee's ranking member. "If there's one consistent pattern in Mr. Scalia's long career, it's hostility to the very workers he would be charged with protecting, and the very laws he would be charged with enforcing if he were confirmed."

...

"Eugene Scalia has demonstrated that he remains committed to protecting corporations over working people and is unfit to lead as Secretary of Labor," Lee Saunders, president of AFSCME, the country's largest trade union, said in a statement after Thursday's hearing.

"In both private practice and as the Labor Department's top attorney, Scalia supported the growth of unchecked corporate power and neglected the welfare of working people," Saunders said. "After the Great Recession, Scalia led financial services industry efforts to challenge the 2010 Dodd-Frank law needed to protect working families."

"He opposed efforts to raise the minimum wage for federal workers and advocated for eliminating the fiduciary rule, which requires financial advisors to work in their customers' best interest," Saunders continued. "Scalia also sided against workers and their unions in lawsuits alleging corporations like Boeing and UPS were retaliating and discriminating against employees."

Urging senators to reject Scalia's nomination, the union leader concluded that "we need a champion for working people in the Department of Labor who will advance standards that protect overtime pay, strengthen workplace safety, and defend workers' rights over corporate interests."

[Galaxian]

well, there's little doubt that Iran provided the weaponry, even if it was the hutis who aimed and fired them, and who knows whether Iranian 'advisors' might not have helped the hutis aim at the Saudi oil fields...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8S4WHKJCs
Go to 9 minute mark to see false flag evidence


https://www.rt.com/news/469319-saudi-ir ... nsibility/
"On the videos of the exposure of the cruise missiles you can clearly see on the cruise missile casing the code MC-79050. This is JETDS code (Joint Army-Navy Nomenclature System), used by NATO for weapons. The MC 79050 is manufactured by NATO member Czech Republic military hardware producer PBS. I think the engine is this: PBS TJ100 Turbojet Engine or a newer version. How did Iran or the Houthis purchase NATO cruise missiles? If not: who had these missiles and used them for a false flag operation?"

https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/fi ... 1568875682 On the left of the photo of the casing


Infact they haven't even shown video or photographs of the supposed attack. The only thing we have is their word. They say that the accuracy of the holes at the explosion sites shows that it was a superior technology.... Such as HAND placement??? Yes, operatives go on to the tanks, vessels & such and place remotely activated limpet explosives. Then they are exploded & wow, must've been drones, eh?

The ONLY argument against the false flag scenario is that the Yemenis claimed responsibility. So there's just two options: False flag, OR Yemeni drones. The bullshit about Iran is simply disinfo shit-stirring to give an excuse for an attack.

[Brian Peacock]

Nothing is never not what it doesn't seem to appear to not be.

[Tero]

suspicious minds.jpg (26.1 KiB) Viewed 2107 times

[Brian Peacock]

It's like we're caught in a trap...

[Joe]

[Seabass]

Ex-Republican, Tom Nichols:

If This Isn’t Impeachable, Nothing Is
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... se/598570/

The president of the United States reportedly sought the help of a foreign government against an American citizen who might challenge him for his office. This is the single most important revelation in a scoop by The Wall Street Journal, and if it is true, then President Donald Trump should be impeached and removed from office immediately.

Until now, there was room for reasonable disagreement over impeachment as both a matter of politics and a matter of tactics. The Mueller report revealed despicably unpatriotic behavior by Trump and his minions, but it did not trigger a political judgment with a majority of Americans that it warranted impeachment. The Democrats, for their part, remained unwilling to risk their new majority in Congress on a move destined to fail in a Republican-controlled Senate.

Now, however, we face an entirely new situation. In a call to the new president of Ukraine, Trump reportedly attempted to pressure the leader of a sovereign state into conducting an investigation—a witch hunt, one might call it—of a U.S. citizen, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter Biden.

As the Ukrainian Interior Ministry official Anton Gerashchenko told the Daily Beast when asked about the president’s apparent requests, “Clearly, Trump is now looking for kompromat to discredit his opponent Biden, to take revenge for his friend Paul Manafort, who is serving seven years in prison.”

Clearly.

If this in itself is not impeachable, then the concept has no meaning. Trump’s grubby commandeering of the presidency’s fearsome and nearly uncheckable powers in foreign policy for his own ends is a gross abuse of power and an affront both to our constitutional order and to the integrity of our elections.

The story may even be worse than we know. If Trump tried to use military aid to Ukraine as leverage, as reporters are now investigating, then he held Ukrainian and American security hostage to his political vendettas. It means nothing to say that no such deal was reached; the important point is that Trump abused his position in the Oval Office.

In this matter, we need not rely on a newspaper account, nor even on the complaint, so far unseen, of a whistle-blower. Instead, we have a sweaty, panicked admission on national television by Trump’s bizarre homunculus, Rudy Giuliani, that he did in fact seek such an investigation on Trump’s behalf. Giuliani later again confirmed Trump’s role, tweeting that a “President telling a Pres-elect of a well known corrupt country he better investigate corruption that affects US is doing his job.”

continued: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... se/598570/