All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Joe]

So you can't prove he doesn't have the power, but you claim he doesn't.

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, so answer your own questions.

The burden of proof was not met, which is why Mueller was not able to prosecute.

As to exonerating, if you want to say that is within his power, you will have to back up that claim. As far as I can tell, it is 'marketing wankery' and not a legal standard.

I figured you'd run away from backing up your claims. You just parroted what you heard without thinking about it.

[Cunt]

I've thought plenty. You haven't gotten that list out of people he previously exonerated...maybe there isn't a list.

Maybe he isn't hired to exonerate anyone, but is a prosecutor.

If so, and he found nothing to prosecute, it would look exactly like it does now.

And who is posting the drone videos of Little St James Island? Do you think it's really Rusty Shackelford?

Could it be that THIS will be what finally takes down Trump?

[Tero]

Your ex-oneration is becoming tedious.

[Cunt]

Not as tedious as the endless insistence that THIS time, Mueller is going to say the magic thing that makes Trump guilty!! This time, he'll SAVE the Dems.

Or, he'll come off like a handsome zero, who gets a letter from his boss first saying read the report, then answers every question 'i don't know' or 'out of my purvue ' or 'read the Mueller report, I can't remember'.

[Tero]

Mueller is not going to get us further. Up to Nancy now.

[Cunt]

Mueller is not going to get us further. Up to Nancy now.

She will have to ask the Squad for direction. Old White Men need to step back and let progressive heroes take charge.

[Joe]

I've thought plenty. You haven't gotten that list out of people he previously exonerated...maybe there isn't a list.

Maybe he isn't hired to exonerate anyone, but is a prosecutor.

If so, and he found nothing to prosecute, it would look exactly like it does now.

And who is posting the drone videos of Little St James Island? Do you think it's really Rusty Shackelford?

Could it be that THIS will be what finally takes down Trump?

There's your problem Cunt. You've thought plenty, but haven't done a thing to learn the subject you blather on about.

If you'd done your homework, and had a scintilla of a clue, you'd realize that Mueller exonerated Trump of criminal conspiracy to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election, and answered your own question.

But that's a lot to expect of you, so don't feel bad. You've still got ganja on hand, and plenty of time for trolling.

[Cunt]

I've thought plenty. You haven't gotten that list out of people he previously exonerated...maybe there isn't a list.

Maybe he isn't hired to exonerate anyone, but is a prosecutor.

If so, and he found nothing to prosecute, it would look exactly like it does now.

And who is posting the drone videos of Little St James Island? Do you think it's really Rusty Shackelford?

Could it be that THIS will be what finally takes down Trump?

There's your problem Cunt. You've thought plenty, but haven't done a thing to learn the subject you blather on about.

If you'd done your homework, and had a scintilla of a clue, you'd realize that Mueller exonerated Trump of criminal conspiracy to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election, and answered your own question.

But that's a lot to expect of you, so don't feel bad. You've still got ganja on hand, and plenty of time for trolling.

Good of you to claim I'm clueless, but he is granted authority to prosecute, but not to exonerate. He can only choose to prosecute or not, can't choose to exonerate.

But go on wishing there was more to it. He did his best, it didn't result in any...well, results. The meeting yesterday was just a bunch of Dems pretending it meant more than what was written in the report.

Mueller still hasn't exonerated you (or me) so maybe we should wait to see if he does.

[Joe]

I've thought plenty. You haven't gotten that list out of people he previously exonerated...maybe there isn't a list.

Maybe he isn't hired to exonerate anyone, but is a prosecutor.

If so, and he found nothing to prosecute, it would look exactly like it does now.

And who is posting the drone videos of Little St James Island? Do you think it's really Rusty Shackelford?

Could it be that THIS will be what finally takes down Trump?

There's your problem Cunt. You've thought plenty, but haven't done a thing to learn the subject you blather on about.

If you'd done your homework, and had a scintilla of a clue, you'd realize that Mueller exonerated Trump of criminal conspiracy to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election, and answered your own question.

But that's a lot to expect of you, so don't feel bad. You've still got ganja on hand, and plenty of time for trolling.

Good of you to claim I'm clueless, but he is granted authority to prosecute, but not to exonerate. He can only choose to prosecute or not, can't choose to exonerate.

But go on wishing there was more to it. He did his best, it didn't result in any...well, results. The meeting yesterday was just a bunch of Dems pretending it meant more than what was written in the report.

Mueller still hasn't exonerated you (or me) so maybe we should wait to see if he does.

It's easy to claim when you demonstrate it with every post. For instance,

Over the course of his nearly two-year-long probe, special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of prosecutors have now indicted 34 individuals and three Russian businesses on charges ranging from computer hacking to conspiracy and financial crimes.

Those indictments have led to seven guilty pleas and four people sentenced to prison.

is something only the clueless would call no results.

[Cunt]

So what was learned from the interview with Mueller yesterday?

I'll give you a hint - he promised to not wander off the written report.

He did reiterate that he couldn't 'exonerate' him, as if he has ever done that to anyone lol

[Tero]

Will Trump’s Racist Attacks Help Him? Ask Blue-Collar White Women.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... en/594805/
“The white working-class men look like they are approaching the 2016 margins for Trump, but not the women,” says the veteran Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg, in a judgment supported by public polling. “Clearly the women are in a different place.” Greenberg conducted the focus groups, whose findings were released today, for the American Federation of Teachers.

[Joe]

So what was learned from the interview with Mueller yesterday?

I'll give you a hint - he promised to not wander off the written report.

He did reiterate that he couldn't 'exonerate' him, as if he has ever done that to anyone lol

Perhaps you should have listened more closely. I'm only a couple of hours into the first hearing and he's been accused of exonerating Joseph Mifsud and Christopher Steele. You did watch the whole two hearings, and read the report, right?

[pErvinalia]

I saw some highlights yesterday, and I can't remember the exact wording but when asked something like "could Trump be indicted for a crime if he wasn't prez", the answer was "yes". So he's clearly not exonerated Trump.

[JimC]

To me, that was more of a hypothetical, simply confirming that some legal moves that are not possible on a sitting President are possible once he leaves office...

[Cunt]

Perhaps you should have listened more closely. I'm only a couple of hours into the first hearing and he's been accused of exonerating Joseph Mifsud and Christopher Steele. You did watch the whole two hearings, and read the report, right?

No need to watch yesterdays festivities. It was all a show for something or other.

See, he even got a letter from the boss, saying he wouldn't say anything beyond what was in the report.

So yesterday didn't change anything, doesn't matter. Lots of people are screeching about it being significant, but we'll see. It could be that the handsome, forgetful old codger really did know the material, but as a true patriot, can not reveal what he knows for national security reasons.

To me, that was more of a hypothetical, simply confirming that some legal moves that are not possible on a sitting President are possible once he leaves office...

Yeah, that's what I got too.

He said what he was going to say, got a letter reiterating the limits to his testimony, and then proceeded to spend the day not saying anything new.

At least, I think yesterday could be ignored, and nothing would change about the situation.

Could he really have just forgotten who Fusion was? Does anyone believe that?