Sri Lanka Bombings

User avatar
Seabass
Posts: 7339
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:32 pm
About me: Pluviophile
Location: Covidiocracy
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Seabass » Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:36 am

Forty Two wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2019 8:38 pm
The volume of terrorism coming from the Muslim world is unmatched in human history. There is a force that is attacking western civilization, and with it, Christianity. Look at the expulsions and diaspora of Christians from Lebanon, from Syria, from Iraq, etc. The middle east and most of the Muslim world is spreading Islam, on purpose. There is no concept of separation of mosque and state. That's haram. That's a concept that will end, if power gets in the hands of the wrong people.
Muslims ain't got shit on Christians. Bush Baby's Crusades have racked up over a half million body count since '01.

And of course there are all these radicalized Trumplings who've been sending bombs through the mail and shooting up synagogues and mosques lately.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by JimC » Thu Apr 25, 2019 6:24 am

Seabass wrote:
Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:36 am
Forty Two wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2019 8:38 pm
The volume of terrorism coming from the Muslim world is unmatched in human history. There is a force that is attacking western civilization, and with it, Christianity. Look at the expulsions and diaspora of Christians from Lebanon, from Syria, from Iraq, etc. The middle east and most of the Muslim world is spreading Islam, on purpose. There is no concept of separation of mosque and state. That's haram. That's a concept that will end, if power gets in the hands of the wrong people.
Muslims ain't got shit on Christians. Bush Baby's Crusades have racked up over a half million body count since '01.

And of course there are all these radicalized Trumplings who've been sending bombs through the mail and shooting up synagogues and mosques lately.
Seriously, you can't call US military actions under Bush as a christian crusade, even if IS propaganda would have it so. It can be criticised on its own, but it is not religiously inspired. And recent fundamentalist christian violence is very small change, both compared to current Islamic violence and historical christian violence.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60734
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by pErvinalia » Thu Apr 25, 2019 6:37 am

Yeah if anything Iraq war - The Sequel was payback for Daddie's failure in Iraq War - Genesis.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Hermit » Thu Apr 25, 2019 6:40 am

President Bush jr. saw himself as an Instrument of God's Will when he decided to wage war, and I wonder how many US Christians, including members of the armed forces, supported his decision on religious grounds.

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
NineBerry
Tame Wolf
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:35 pm
Location: nSk
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by NineBerry » Thu Apr 25, 2019 7:41 am

Behind the Iraq was was something much worse than religion: Nationalism

User avatar
Seabass
Posts: 7339
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:32 pm
About me: Pluviophile
Location: Covidiocracy
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Seabass » Thu Apr 25, 2019 7:55 am

There were multiple reasons. Revenge for 911. Revenge for Saddam's attempt on Papa Bush. Old animosities between Christendom and Islam. Oil.

Same with Muslamic terrorism. Some Iraqi kid who kills westerners after watching his family get blown up by a Hellfire missile probably isn't motivated by religion.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Forty Two » Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:16 pm

Seabass wrote:
Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:36 am
Forty Two wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2019 8:38 pm
The volume of terrorism coming from the Muslim world is unmatched in human history. There is a force that is attacking western civilization, and with it, Christianity. Look at the expulsions and diaspora of Christians from Lebanon, from Syria, from Iraq, etc. The middle east and most of the Muslim world is spreading Islam, on purpose. There is no concept of separation of mosque and state. That's haram. That's a concept that will end, if power gets in the hands of the wrong people.
Muslims ain't got shit on Christians. Bush Baby's Crusades have racked up over a half million body count since '01.
Well, if you think that the war on terrorism and the Iraq War were crusades akin to Jihad, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
Seabass wrote:
Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:36 am
And of course there are all these radicalized Trumplings who've been sending bombs through the mail and shooting up synagogues and mosques lately.
those guys are asshole terrorist, etc. But, it's not just radicalized Trumplings - leftists also are shooting, hitting, bombing and burning. However, if you want to compare that to a worldwide religious holy war going on with the stated goal of establishing a caliphate and spreading theocratic Islam throughout the entire world, then that's up to you. I differ on that.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Seabass
Posts: 7339
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:32 pm
About me: Pluviophile
Location: Covidiocracy
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Seabass » Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:27 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:16 pm
Seabass wrote:
Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:36 am
Forty Two wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2019 8:38 pm
The volume of terrorism coming from the Muslim world is unmatched in human history. There is a force that is attacking western civilization, and with it, Christianity. Look at the expulsions and diaspora of Christians from Lebanon, from Syria, from Iraq, etc. The middle east and most of the Muslim world is spreading Islam, on purpose. There is no concept of separation of mosque and state. That's haram. That's a concept that will end, if power gets in the hands of the wrong people.
Muslims ain't got shit on Christians. Bush Baby's Crusades have racked up over a half million body count since '01.
Well, if you think that the war on terrorism and the Iraq War were crusades akin to Jihad, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
Seabass wrote:
Thu Apr 25, 2019 5:36 am
And of course there are all these radicalized Trumplings who've been sending bombs through the mail and shooting up synagogues and mosques lately.
those guys are asshole terrorist, etc. But, it's not just radicalized Trumplings - leftists also are shooting, hitting, bombing and burning. However, if you want to compare that to a worldwide religious holy war going on with the stated goal of establishing a caliphate and spreading theocratic Islam throughout the entire world, then that's up to you. I differ on that.
Well, if you think Muslims are more dangerous and destructive than Christians, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
If you think Muslims kill more people than Christians do, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
If you think Muslim terrorism does more damage to the world than US imperialism, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
If you think left-wing terrorism is as bad as right-wing terrorism (which includes both Muslim terrorism and Christian/white supremacist terrorism), then... well that's just preposterous.

Image
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by JimC » Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:54 pm

Seabass wrote:

Well, if you think Muslims are more dangerous and destructive than Christians, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
If you think Muslims kill more people than Christians do, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
In the present era, that is exactly what I think, if we are being clear that we are speaking of violence and death largely motivated by religion (fully admitting much christian violence in its past). I do take your point that there are always mixed motives, but I am fairly certain that the deaths and destruction caused by western/US military actions in the last 50 years or so fairly straightforward economic/political power motives. In some participants, there might be an overlay of christian fundamentalism, but it would rarely be the main motive. In the case of jihadists, their main religious motives may also align with other political motives, but religious extremism is in the driver's seat.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Galaxian
Posts: 704
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:11 pm
About me: Too old & too far away from the Beloved...
Location: Koreye-koor
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Galaxian » Wed May 01, 2019 3:28 pm

Dr. Steve Pieczenik has a plausible link between Notre Dame arson & Sri Lanka Terrorism.
Do yourselves a favor & visit his channel here: https://www.youtube.com/user/stevepieczenik/videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1gGzvp2ZIY
:coffee:
The true seeker looks for the truth wherever it may be and readily accepts it, without shame, without hope for reward and without fear of punishment._Sam Nejad
There's no Mercy. There's no Justice. There is only Natural Selection! _Galaxian
The more important a news item, the more likely that it's a hidden agenda disinformation_Galaxian
"This world of sheeple has no hope!" Thus just 13 years left before extinction by AI_ Galaxian

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by JimC » Wed May 01, 2019 9:07 pm

"Plausible" is such a weasel word...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Forty Two » Wed May 01, 2019 9:28 pm

JimC wrote:
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:54 pm
Seabass wrote:

Well, if you think Muslims are more dangerous and destructive than Christians, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
If you think Muslims kill more people than Christians do, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
In the present era, that is exactly what I think, if we are being clear that we are speaking of violence and death largely motivated by religion (fully admitting much christian violence in its past). I do take your point that there are always mixed motives, but I am fairly certain that the deaths and destruction caused by western/US military actions in the last 50 years or so fairly straightforward economic/political power motives. In some participants, there might be an overlay of christian fundamentalism, but it would rarely be the main motive. In the case of jihadists, their main religious motives may also align with other political motives, but religious extremism is in the driver's seat.
That seems to me to be self-evident. The West, for lack of a better term, stopped going to war over religion a long time ago. The US has never been to war for religious reasons. And, the conflation of conflict between nations in the sense of war, with a civilian, non-state actor led guerilla war EXPRESSLY in the name of a particular religion, with the aim of spreading that religion and squashing other religions, is something Christians haven't done in ages, with some exceptions.

Islamist extremists have perpetrated 31,221 terror attacks and killed 146,811 people worldwide since 9/11, says the reputed German newspaper Die Welt in a report called "18 Years of Terror". That's an average five terror attacks. Every single day. For Eighteen years. And there have been over 3,000 attacks involving more than 12 victims, accounting for about 95,000 of the deaths. https://www.fdesouche.com/1199257-un-jo ... 1-victimes



And, in Seabass' chart, 23% are "Islamist Extremism?" Well, they represent less than 1% of the population of the "domestic" United States. So, 1% of the population commits 23% of the Extremist Murder. That appears to be rather "disproportionate" to their overall population.....
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by JimC » Wed May 01, 2019 9:51 pm

A very high proportion of those deaths have occurred as part of the sectarian war between Sunni and Shiite. This of course doesn't make such deaths any less heinous, but it needs to be pointed out; some people in the west assume that all Islamic terrorism is directed at western or christian targets...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Seabass
Posts: 7339
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:32 pm
About me: Pluviophile
Location: Covidiocracy
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by Seabass » Wed May 01, 2019 10:18 pm

JimC wrote:
Fri Apr 26, 2019 9:54 pm
Seabass wrote:

Well, if you think Muslims are more dangerous and destructive than Christians, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
If you think Muslims kill more people than Christians do, then that's your view of it. You're welcome to it.
In the present era, that is exactly what I think, if we are being clear that we are speaking of violence and death largely motivated by religion (fully admitting much christian violence in its past). I do take your point that there are always mixed motives, but I am fairly certain that the deaths and destruction caused by western/US military actions in the last 50 years or so fairly straightforward economic/political power motives. In some participants, there might be an overlay of christian fundamentalism, but it would rarely be the main motive. In the case of jihadists, their main religious motives may also align with other political motives, but religious extremism is in the driver's seat.
Sure, religion probably wasn't the primary motive for Bush & co, but I do think the religious and cultural divide was a significant factor. Do you think we would have invaded Iraq if Bush was an atheist, or if Iraq was majority Christian? I doubt it.

In any case we agree that there are always mixed motives, with both Cretins and Moose lambs. That was the main point I was making...
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." —Voltaire
"They want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved." —Sebastian Gorka

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sri Lanka Bombings

Post by JimC » Wed May 01, 2019 10:21 pm

Mixed motives sure, but I think that, when it comes to current violence, the muslim mix has much more religion than violence perpetrated by the west...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests