All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Forty Two]

The Mueller special counsel investigation is rumored to be over. Looks like some closure is expected next week.

MSNBC and CNN were already outraged that a report might not be made public, and they had democrat politicians on talking about how they won't let the Trump administration get away with blocking a report --- a report which nobody has said would be blocked, nobody has tried to block, and nobody is even sure will be issued at all, much less next week. But, they sure whipped up a lot of outrage - once again - over something that hasn't happened yet.

The skinny is that the close of the "investigation" is leaked now to prep people for an "anticlimax" -- i.e. - Trump didndoonuffin.

And, by the way, the bookies have Trump a heavy favorite for reelection in 2020 -- https://www.mediaite.com/entertainment/ ... -favorite/

[Cunt]

Sanders is running, and I've found reasons to like him, but damn has he got a big hill to climb.

Owns multiple homes, and is worth millions, while preaching something else...too white...too old...too easily dismissed as 'socialist'.

It does look like Trump again, and why wouldn't the US pick him? He has done so much for the media and our understanding of them.

The best one recently was when the media scrambled to read his efforts to support international gay rights as somehow hateful lol

They keep showing how 'Smollett' they are, and sooner or later, people will accept that liars keep lying.

[Forty Two]

Sanders is running, and I've found reasons to like him, but damn has he got a big hill to climb.

Owns multiple homes, and is worth millions, while preaching something else...too white...too old...too easily dismissed as 'socialist'.

It does look like Trump again, and why wouldn't the US pick him? He has done so much for the media and our understanding of them.

The best one recently was when the media scrambled to read his efforts to support international gay rights as somehow hateful lol

They keep showing how 'Smollett' they are, and sooner or later, people will accept that liars keep lying.

He's not dismissed as a socialist. He IS a socialist. He owns it. That's one thing I respect about him. He doesn't dick around about it. He admits it, and is proud of it. He thinks he's right.

Smollett just got arrested -- felony charges. Poor guy. I feel bad for him. But, what he did was terrible -- he is part of that movement bent on presenting American society as racist, homophobic etc. The fact that he had to fake it, though, really is a testament to how few actual incidents of any real import there are. I mean, racism exists, of course - I've never denied that. But, why would he have to fake an incident, if that's really "America in 2019"? If that's America in 2019, then the news would be rife with similar incidents.

[Cunt]

Yeah, he had to not only pay someone to do the fake attack, he had to outsource the job to foreigners.

I don't want to feel bad for him. He was, either deliberately or accidentally, a dupe for political ass-hats who like to encourage racism. It seems to delight so many people to accuse everyone of racism.

I prefer what Morgan Freeman said about how to end it. Stop talking about it.

[pErvinalia]

I wish the climate change proponents would offer a clear, short-term falsifiable claim to support their view of things.

CO2 levels in the atmosphere have been increasing since the industrial age. 20 of the past 22 have been the hottest on record.

There's two claims for you to falsify. Go you good thing.

[Cunt]

Good job missing the point. You had better just accept the new taxes, restrictions and global efforts.

[pErvinalia]

How did I miss the point? You asked for a falsifiable claim. I gave you two.

[Cunt]

No, I wanted a point which could falsify the claims of climate change approvers.

See, you would have to make a prediction, then be ready for the results to disprove (or prove) your theory.

[Tero]

It's libertarian talk: if it can be connected to a tax, then it's fake science.

[pErvinalia]

No, I wanted a point which could falsify the claims of climate change approvers.

See, you would have to make a prediction, then be ready for the results to disprove (or prove) your theory.

I'm sorry, but I'm not following what you want.

[Seabass]

The fact that he had to fake it, though, really is a testament to how few actual incidents of any real import there are.

Not at all. But your view that one staged hate crime is a testament to the infrequency of actual hate crimes is a testament to the fact that you are a certifiable whackjob who believes in an alternate reality.

[Cunt]

Falsifiable claim which supports, or refutes the claims made by climate change.

The most useful one would be 'with the new taxes, rainbows will appear every thursday noon'. Then, if the rainbows don't appear, the new taxes weren't effective.

Of course, it is tougher to make a clear claim, and any examination of the claims brings a chorus of 'climate change denier', but nevermind. I doubt you or I know enough to understand the claims, or how to assess them. We should just shut up and accept our taxes, like the peaceful Frenchmen.

one staged hate crime

Only the wilfully blind, or the genuinely stupid, could think it was one.

http://www.fakehatecrimes.org/

[Tero]

”Jussie Smollett is a 36 year old entertainer who made a terrible mistake.

You're a 72 year old scam artist who perpetuates racist hoaxes and slurs INTENTIONALLY.

What the fuck is YOUR excuse?”
https://mobile.twitter.com/realdonaldtr ... 8512941057

[Cunt]

So you think paying someone to fake a hate crime, is not a racist act, and a hate crime?

Wonder if your judgement here has anything to do with skin colour...

[pErvinalia]

Faking a hate crime is a hate crime? That's a new one.