All Things Trump: Is it over yet?

[Seabass]

Glad you posted that - it shows what a scumbag McCabe was. McCabe's own words support what I've been saying for the last 2 years.

Glad you enjoyed it, you crazy crackhead.

[Cunt]

Glad you enjoyed it, you crazy crackhead.

A Democrat supporter with such quality really helps the Republicans in their 2020 race. I'm surprised Tero and Scot Dutchy don't think you work for the Russians.

[Forty Two]

McCabe was fired for a lack of candor. In other words, for lying. At the time of his firing it was speculated he lied about leaking sensitive information during the 2016 presidential election about the FBI’s ongoing Clinton Foundation investigation to The Wall Street Journal.

McCabe denied any wrongdoing and after he was fired wrote an op-ed claiming his innocence, playing the victim and even justifying the leak by claiming Comey knew about it. His wife, Clinton ally Jill McCabe, took to the pages of The Washington Post to defend her Virginia Senate campaign. She also claimed her husband never used his official position at the FBI to bolster her candidacy, but the facts show he used his official FBI email to encourage friendly FBI colleagues to show their support.

Things didn’t stop there. McCabe hired a K Street lobbying firm to set up a legal fund, where he raised $500,000 from sympathetic leftists who viewed his firing as unjust, even cruel, since it happened just two days before retirement.

But the truth is, McCabe’s lying was worse than previously imagined and cited for his firing. Speculation about his lack of candor was overwhelmingly confirmed by a long awaited OIG report late last week, which showed McCabe’s behavior was not only dishonest, but that he lied multiple times under oath to OIG investigators and FBI agents. OIG investigators concluded his repeated lying was calculated and beneficial to him, not the bureau or the agents who work inside of it.

“As detailed in this report, the OIG found that then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lacked candor, including under oath, on multiple occasions in connection with describing his role in connection with a disclosure to the [Journal], and that conduct violated FBI Offense Codes 2.5 and 2.6,” the report states. “The OIG also concluded that McCabe’s disclosure of the existence of an ongoing investigation in the manner described in this report violated the FBI’s and the Department’s media policy and constituted misconduct.”

“McCabe sought to legitimize his actions by falsely claiming that he had told Comey that he authorized the disclosure and that Comey was fine with his decision,” the report continues.

McCabe was caught lying four times, three of them under oath. OIG issued the full report to the FBI “for such action that it deems to be appropriate.” In other words, referred McCabe for disciplinary action to be determined by the FBI and Department of Justice.

This is the ultimate question. Will McCabe face prosecution for lying multiple times under oath to federal authorities? Or will he keep his taxpayer-funded pension after being fired and live happily in retirement as a martyr for the resistance?

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-ju ... -for-lying

[Seabass]

Definitely the behavior of an innocent person:

Trump Has Publicly Attacked the Russia Investigation More Than 1,100 Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... ation.html

President Trump has publicly criticized dozens of people and groups related to federal inquiries into contacts between his campaign and Russia, according to a New York Times analysis of nearly every public statement or Twitter post that he has made while in office.

The attacks, which number nearly 1,200, are part of a strategy to beat back the investigations. They have also opened him to possible obstruction of justice charges. They include statements made on Twitter, in official speeches, at rallies and during news media interviews and other press events.

While it is highly unusual for anyone — let alone the president of the United States — to comment on continuing criminal investigations, Mr. Trump has done so at least once on 330 days, or more than 43 percent of his time in office as of Feb. 14.

[pErvinalia]

Trump announces plan to push for decriminalization of homosexuality on a global scale.

Response from the Left: It's because he's racist.

He’s a racist crook. Head of gang of crooks.
0A1E7249-9198-4A7B-ADA8-A122C92F68A1.jpeg

No, no, it's just a beat up and conspiracy by the Dems and the mainstream media.

[Seabass]

[Cunt]

Isn't that the guy who got shit-canned for lying at work, for his own benefit? Shouldn't that title read 'Ex-FBI Director'?

Can't see the videos in my region, and because I know your position so well already.

[Tero]

We have all kinds of presidents. Some are even US presidents, like President Bush. One is supposed to be Mr President. I don’t know what the female replacing Trump will be called. Director McCabe probably still has some status, even though Trump tried to strip him down to his underwear.

[Tero]

What would be the point of the panel?
First meeting:
-everybody who thinks climate change is fake raise their hand
-OK, unanimous! Let’s go home.

[Tero]

[L'Emmerdeur]

With a US president who believes that climate science is a hoax, it makes sense to appoint a climate science denying loon to set government policy.

'Trump’s pick to chair new climate panel once said CO2 has been maligned like “Jews under Hitler”'

The Pentagon and several federal agencies have repeatedly warned over the years that climate change is a threat to national security. Yet the White House is reportedly convening a panel to question it anew.

The Washington Post, citing a National Security Council (NSC) discussion paper it obtained, reports that White House staff are preparing an executive order for President Donald Trump’s signature that would establish a Presidential Committee on Climate Security to be chaired by a notorious climate change denier.

That man, NSC senior director William Happer, argued on CNBC in 2014 that “the demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler.”

...

Happer’s views have gotten no less extreme since then. When he was under consideration for the role of Trump’s science adviser in early 2017, Happer sent an email to a Jezebel reader asserting that the “demonization of CO2” “really differs little from the Nazi persecution of the Jews, the Soviet extermination of class enemies or ISIL slaughter of infidels.”

Media Matters has previously detailed how Happer, a retired Princeton professor who is not trained as a climate scientist, has tried — unsuccessfully — to conceal the fact that oil interests have directly funded his “research.” And as a recent paper in Nature Climate Change noted, the fossil fuel industry has long been involved in campaigns in US politics “aiming to refute, confuse and obstruct acceptance of the reality of climate change,” using scientists just like Happer to spread misinformation.

It's a good thing that the US has withdrawn from the immoral war on carbon dioxide promoted by the Paris agreement. A good thing, I tell you!

[Cunt]

I wish the climate change proponents would offer a clear, short-term falsifiable claim to support their view of things. Everything is so vague...like it would be tough to tell if France has made the world better off...they certainly have made their country worse off, so how do we know what impact their sacrifice has made to climate change...?

It is, of course, haram to question or criticize climate change claims, so there probably won't be falsifiable short term claims offered...

[Forty Two]

Definitely the behavior of an innocent person:

Trump Has Publicly Attacked the Russia Investigation More Than 1,100 Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... ation.html

President Trump has publicly criticized dozens of people and groups related to federal inquiries into contacts between his campaign and Russia, according to a New York Times analysis of nearly every public statement or Twitter post that he has made while in office.

The attacks, which number nearly 1,200, are part of a strategy to beat back the investigations. They have also opened him to possible obstruction of justice charges. They include statements made on Twitter, in official speeches, at rallies and during news media interviews and other press events.

While it is highly unusual for anyone — let alone the president of the United States — to comment on continuing criminal investigations, Mr. Trump has done so at least once on 330 days, or more than 43 percent of his time in office as of Feb. 14.

It's highly unusual for "anyone" to comment on continuing criminal investigations? Really? Come off it, New York Times -- how many "high ranking officials" has the New York Times interviewed and referred to in their articles about continuing criminal investigations?

What they're saying, really, is that Trump is supposed to keep his mouth shut, and let the press tell us what to believe. Because, you know, they've been so accurate in all their breaking news stories over the last two years. That's like when Chris Cuomo on CNN had the fucking cahones to say that it is "illegal" for citizens to read what wikileaks publishes, but it's not illegal for CNN reporters to do so, and that it's their job to tell us what they think we need to know about it. Fucking creeps.

Of course it's the behavior of an innocent person. An innocent person says "this investigation [as to me] is bullshit." He knows it's a hunt for his head. The idea that this is some non-partisan commission investigating "Russian meddling wherever it leads" is total horseshit. If it wasn't horseshit, you'd have investigations into Jill Stein's campaign and Bernie Sanders campaign, too, and Hillary Clinton's campaign with all their possible "collusion" with British nationals ("with links to the British government") and Russians providing information on Trump.

[Seabass]

[Cunt]

I guess this proves McCabe is a shit guy, too.

Man, what a swampful of creatures Washington is lol