
(continued, do ya own web search - not hard with this story...)
Thanks for the video. Confirms that you are implying guilt by association.
More forgivable than the even blander crap that preceded this crap. Need I cite examples of that shite?
He wants to get even, and hint at innocence without the need to go through a investigative trial that might uncover the truth. (whatever that might be). It's well known in the science literature that underage sex is a marker for suicidal behaviour in youth. This being multiplied if there are same sex relationships(see proper science article underneath). So the truth of the matter is important outside of press enquiries, and within press enquiries...that are likely to be more tenacious in their investigations and amplify the chances of a conviction. Not blinker a police investigation, often work in parallel with one.Strontium Dog wrote: ↑Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:40 pmIt's extraordinary, the ruling essentially bans the press from naming a person suspected of a crime - at least, if they are rich and famous anyway.
I'm not going to disagree!Hermit wrote: ↑Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:12 pmMore forgivable than the even blander crap that preceded this crap. Need I cite examples of that shite?Rum wrote: ↑Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:50 pmThis passed for 'rock n' roll' in the pre Beatles 60s in the UK. Unforgivable really.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJhq46ZpVbM/youtube]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests