Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
- JimC
- The sentimental bloke
- Posts: 74159
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
- About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
Again, it's not black or white. There is a spectrum of democratically elected representative government, with some being a bit closer to the ideal of exactly equal voting power for each individual. Party politics and potential gerrymandering are also issues. But all countries that allow free voting systems are reasonably described as democracies, even if the fine details can be criticised...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!
And my gin!
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
Meh. So many problems with democratic governments. Gerrymandering, different sized constituencies and the first past the post rule are not the only ones. In my opinion there are at least three others that are even worse. The influence of the media is one of them. They influence voters hand in glove with big business. Another one is the issue of who nominates the candidates (see Youtube clip below). The third (also dealt with in that clip) is whose policy wishes are implemented on and whose are ignored.
In the end, though, Scot Dutchy is completely out of order when he asserts that there are "many systems of government but only one is democratic". The Dutch iteration may well be among the best, but it is not the only democracy in the world. Arguably, the Swiss may have a more democratic one, what with their frequent referendums giving the people a direct say. Then again, Switzerland was the last first world nation to give women the vote (shut up, Laklak & co).
In the end, though, Scot Dutchy is completely out of order when he asserts that there are "many systems of government but only one is democratic". The Dutch iteration may well be among the best, but it is not the only democracy in the world. Arguably, the Swiss may have a more democratic one, what with their frequent referendums giving the people a direct say. Then again, Switzerland was the last first world nation to give women the vote (shut up, Laklak & co).
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
While agreeing up to a point Jim. They are not democracies but systems of government that create the illusion of democracies.JimC wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:33 amAgain, it's not black or white. There is a spectrum of democratically elected representative government, with some being a bit closer to the ideal of exactly equal voting power for each individual. Party politics and potential gerrymandering are also issues. But all countries that allow free voting systems are reasonably described as democracies, even if the fine details can be criticised...
Election are not just a question of going along and choosing a candidate. It is the whole process from registration to government forming which is where many fail. Registration is in many countries a huge hurdle even in first world ones. The financing of the elections is another very dodgy area. Then the actual system of voting; paper and pencil or a voting machine.
These are all mine fields that have to be solved at the top level to be even recognised as democracies.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
Unfortunately for your argument they all actually are recognised as democracies. You are just digging a hole for yourself.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41043
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
well, I'm going to finish by agreeing that democracy, for all that it was a grand ideal 2 centuries ago, has become a travesty, wool pulled over the eyes of the masses to hide the fact that the same self renewing and cooptating elites have gone on ruling us and the actual by word is ruling by the elites for the elites with the people's misinformed consent.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Your net is no longer neutral buddy!
That is one way of seeing it.
Who is recognising what Rum? America recognises itself as a democracy? Of course it does. The illusion has to be continued. Like the UK. What are the requirements to register in the UK?
The Sixth General Review of constituency boundaries: public consultations
Nice reading.
Who is recognising what Rum? America recognises itself as a democracy? Of course it does. The illusion has to be continued. Like the UK. What are the requirements to register in the UK?
The Sixth General Review of constituency boundaries: public consultations
Nice reading.
So independent is the commission.2.1 Public hearings The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill originally only made provision for written representations to replace the previous system of representations and local inquiries. During the Second Reading debate on the Bill, Mark Harper, Minister for Political and Constitutional Reform, responded to criticism of the abolition of local inquiries by citing academic opinion on the matter:
They have described oral inquiries as ‘very largely an exercise in allowing the political parties to seek influence over the Commission’s recommendations – in which their sole goal is to promote their own electoral interests.’ They also say that ‘it would be a major error to assume that the consultation process largely involves the general public having its say on the recommendation.’ 4
During the extended Lords Committee stage of the Bill the Government announced that it would make concessions on certain points and would bring in number of amendments at Report Stage. One of these related to the demand for a public hearing stage in the consultation process
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests