Women on top

[devogue]

God I miss my drama.

Good old fashioned drama with a certain je ne sais quoi...

Wild, passionate, sparkly, John McEnroe type drama instead of this unreadable, soulless, fucking Eastern European Ivan Lendl ping pong shite.

[Cunt]

John McEnroe would be sanctioned fur personal attacks.

I mean I can't even call you a fuckwattle here, no matter how carefully un-gendered the term is.

[tattuchu]

I have a bad back, so a woman on top is A-OK with me

[Cunt]

I have a bad back, so a woman on top is A-OK with me

I find that a bit dangerous with back pain, but maybe it's because I'm tall...

[Seabass]

I have a bad back, so a woman on top is A-OK with me

Yeah, but women are soft, weak, and slow, so you'd be better off having a big, strong, powerful, muscular, athletic man on top of you.

[Forty Two]

John McEnroe would be sanctioned fur personal attacks.

I mean I can't even call you a fuckwattle here, no matter how carefully un-gendered the term is.

You can’t. Some others can. The rules are flexible that way.

[Forty Two]

God I miss my drama.

Good old fashioned drama with a certain je ne sais quoi...

Wild, passionate, sparkly, John McEnroe type drama instead of this unreadable, soulless, fucking Eastern European Ivan Lendl ping pong shite.

You have GOT to be kidding me!


:-D

[pErvinalia]

And he's almost certainly proffering a straw man, genius, as he appears to think we argue from a position of strict feminist doctrine and SJWism, which he gleefully argues against by contually pointing out that we haven't provided enough examples that meet that alleged view of feminist doctrine.

It looks to me as if Cunt thinks people have hand-waved and pshawed the matter, stating or implying that there are myriad examples easily identifiable,

I don't remember people claiming there are myriad examples easily identifiable. Can you link to those posts saying that?

I don't view it as a competition. I don't need to prove anything to you or anyone else as I'm self assured enough to not care or even feel threatened by you. If you've got self esteem problems, then that's for you to work out. You can leave me out of it.

If you were so self-assured, you'd not have reacted to Cunt's thread like you did. This whole idea of personally attacking people because they post shitty topics, or topics that you think are motivated by bigotry, belies this assertion by you that you're self-assured not to feel threatened. If you truly were self-assured, you could have entertained the post without accepting it, and either moved on without comment, or if you decided to participate you could have directly addressed his assertions and premises, and discussed them. That's what someone who is self-assured would do. But your option is almost invariably to attack, namecall, insult, derail, and create off-topic arguments over side-issues in your attempt to police the forum of undesirables.

This makes no sense. Quelle surprise. How does aggressively countering what I and others view as likely bigotry have the first thing to do with self-assurance? Misogyny is no threat to me, as I'm a male, in case you hadn't noticed. This is about my philosophy that I've elucidated to you plenty of times in the past. Basically a form of "the standard you walk past is the standard you accept". Of course, you won't believe this for a second, but that's for you to deal with. I'm perfectly self-assured in my philosophy towards hate.

[pErvinalia]

Why would he post that we are upset because feminist doctrine blah blah, when we don't subscribe to the feminist doctrine he describes? This makes as much sense as his claim that he needs on-average examples as opposed to individual exceptions to find female role models to adopt.

Why do you think the topic he raise is shitty?

Why do you answer a question with an unrelated question?

It's not unrelated, IMO. If you answer it, I'll explain how it's related.

Ok, just hang on, I've got some more hoops to jump through..

[Joe]

And he's almost certainly proffering a straw man, genius, as he appears to think we argue from a position of strict feminist doctrine and SJWism, which he gleefully argues against by contually pointing out that we haven't provided enough examples that meet that alleged view of feminist doctrine.

You know, you like to claim that I don't understand these fallacies, but the reality is that you don't understand what I'm saying, and I'm required to clarify something that shouldn't need clarifying if you just dropped the stupid bias and juvenile competition with me in an attempt to show that you possess a greater intellect. You'll probably accuse me of the same, but unlike you who is always harping on about my alleged belief that I have a superior intellect to you, I don't view it as a competition. I don't need to prove anything to you or anyone else as I'm self assured enough to not care or even feel threatened by you. If you've got self esteem problems, then that's for you to work out. You can leave me out of it.

But you don't 'argue', you kind of toss rotten fruit as you run by, giggling about your superiority.

If you wanted to discuss some difference of opinion we had, you would first need to pick one, and stand behind it.

If Rum could elaborate on why this is 'nasty' and 'very male', I would be glad, but he might just be doing a pErvinalia - tossing rotten tomatoes and not trying to explore a difference of opinion.

And Forty Two, you shouldn't use your male privilege to bully pErvinalia to answer a question...treat him like a child, until he acts like an adult.

I'll let Rum speak for himself, but IMO this thread could use a large dose of female perspective. We'd probably have a lot more to think about.

[pErvinalia]

God I miss my drama.

Good old fashioned drama with a certain je ne sais quoi...

Wild, passionate, sparkly, John McEnroe type drama instead of this unreadable, soulless, fucking Eastern European Ivan Lendl ping pong shite.

I've been suspended for not "playing nice" too many times now. All I'm allowed to do is Ivan Lendl.

[pErvinalia]

John McEnroe would be sanctioned fur personal attacks.

I mean I can't even call you a fuckwattle here, no matter how carefully un-gendered the term is.

You can’t. Some others can. The rules are flexible that way.

True. Earlier I posted a bunch of nasty personal attacks from you that weren't sanctioned.

[pErvinalia]

@Joe... I think Rachel summed it up perfectly with her one and only post. I doubt the reaction would be much different from other women.

[Joe]

@Joe... I think Rachel summed it up perfectly with her one and only post. I doubt the reaction would be much different from other women.

Agreed. I think I mentioned that at one point early on, but some guys need repetition to part them from a mesmerizing idee fixe. That's why a small dose of female perspective got lost in the mix for a few of us. Tunnel vision is a male characteristic.

[pErvinalia]

Sadly the forum is now male dominated. It wasn't always that way, but I think most of them got sick of the anti-female nonsense from the likes of Cunt, Meeky, Seth, DaveDodo and 42. It's a credit to Rachel that's she's stuck around.

Although, thankfully Seth and DaveDodo seemed to have fucked off, and Cunt and Meeky only turn up for a trollfest once every 6(?) months or so.